Does the experience of ownership over a rubber hand change body size perception in anorexia nervosa patients?

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 26-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouk Keizer ◽  
Monique A.M. Smeets ◽  
Albert Postma ◽  
Annemarie van Elburg ◽  
H. Chris Dijkerman
1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique A.M Smeets ◽  
J.David Ingleby ◽  
Hans W Hoek ◽  
Geert E.M Panhuysen

1988 ◽  
Vol 153 (S2) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Whitehouse ◽  
Christopher P. L. Freeman ◽  
Annette Annandale

Clinicians who deal with patients with anorexia nervosa are well acquainted with their patients' inability to recognise their emaciation. The patients' insistence that they are normal weight or even overweight, against clear evidence to the contrary, led Bruch (1962) to state that the misperception reaches “delusional proportions”. Studies of body size perception in anorexia nervosa that have used the ‘body part’ method have invariably found that the patients overestimate their body size (Slade & Russell, 1973; Crisp & Kalucy, 1974; Pierloot & Houben, 1978; Garner et al, 1976; Button et al, 1977; Fries, 1977; Casper et al, 1979) but the majority have not found any significant difference in size estimation between patients and controls (Slade, 1985).


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith R. Mccalla ◽  
Katie E. Chipungu ◽  
Patrice G. Saab ◽  
Amanda J. Countryman ◽  
Erin N. Etzel ◽  
...  

Body Image ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren W. Kronenfeld ◽  
Lauren Reba-Harrelson ◽  
Ann Von Holle ◽  
Mae Lynn Reyes ◽  
Cynthia M. Bulik

1995 ◽  
Vol 80 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1379-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick M. Gardner ◽  
Leifann C. Jones ◽  
Eric D. Bokenkamp

Perception of body size was recorded for 63 university students ( M age = 25.3 yr., 41 women) who estimated their own body size using three methods. Using the method of adjustment, subjects over- or underestimated their body size. A signal-detection analysis indicated that subjects were sensitive to detecting a 4% distortion in body size and that there was no systematic bias for reporting distortion as present or absent. Scores on the adaptive probit estimation task were significantly correlated with values for point of subjective equality and the size judgements with the method of adjustment. Over-all, this experiment demonstrated adaptive probit estimation as a reliable indicator of perceived body size, sensitivity in detecting size distortion, and response bias in making body-size judgements.


Author(s):  
Su Yeon Kye ◽  
Kyu-Tae Han ◽  
Sung Hoon Jeong ◽  
Jin Young Choi

This study analyzed the effects of nutrition labeling and examined whether nutrition labeling usage influences the levels of blood markers, such as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) in body-size self-conscious individuals. The dependent variables were HDL-C and TG; the independent variables were the respondents’ awareness of nutrition labeling use, sociodemographic factors, perceived health status, stress, lifestyle, frequency of eating out, family history of hyperlipidemia, survey year, body mass index, total energy intake, and cholesterol levels. Body-size perception was assessed by matching body mass index with subjective body-shape recognition using data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013–2018). Differences were observed in HDL-C and TG levels according to nutrition labeling usage and body-image perception. The group that recognized body image correctly showed high HDL-C and low TG levels when they actively used nutrition labeling, whereas the group that recognized body image incorrectly showed no significant changes in HDL-C and TG levels even when actively using nutrition labeling. The standard nutritional information, which does not consider individual body-size perceptions, has a restrictive effect. Policies should be developed towards tailored intervention strategies considering individual body-size perception.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document