scholarly journals Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 99-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Turner ◽  
Laurens Klerkx ◽  
Kelly Rijswijk ◽  
Tracy Williams ◽  
Tim Barnard
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6897
Author(s):  
Xiangping Jia

The global community faces the challenge of feeding a growing population with declining resources, making transformation to sustainable agriculture and food systems all the more imperative and ‘innovation’ all the more crucial. In this study, agro-food system innovation (re)defines sustainability transition with a complexity construct of cross-scale interaction and an adaptive cycle of system change. By taking a panarchical view, top-down and bottom-up pathways to innovation can be reconciled and are not contradictory, enabling and constraining innovation at every level. This study breaks down the structure of the agricultural innovation system into four components based on multi-level perspectives of sustainability transition, namely: actors and communities, interaction and intermediaries, coherence and connectedness and regimes rules and landscape. Meanwhile, this research frames the functional construct of system innovation for food and agriculture with five perspectives drawing on broad inputs from different schools of thought, namely: knowledge management, user sophistication, entrepreneurial activities’ directionality and reflexive evaluation. This research advocates for an ecosystem approach to agricultural innovation that gives full play to niche-regime interactions using social-technical perspectives.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A Turner ◽  
Tracy Williams ◽  
Graeme Nicholas ◽  
Jeff Foote ◽  
Kelly Rijswijk ◽  
...  

This article describes a process for stimulating engagement among change agents to develop a shared understanding of systemic problems in the agricultural innovation system (AIS), challenge prevalent institutional logics and identify actions they might undertake to stimulate system innovation. The process included (i) multiple actors from the AIS, (ii) reflexivity regarding underlying institutional logics, (iii) an iterative process of practical experimentation to challenge current practices and (iv) actions to encourage generative collaboration. Problem structuring supported change agents’ development of a shared understanding of systemic problems and the role that interrelationships, perspectives and boundaries play in reinforcing or destabilizing current practices and institutional logics. Involving multiple actors from the AIS in challenging underlying institutional logics and encouraging collaboration appeared to stimulate project-level actions and recognition of wider AIS barriers. Collective system analyses for addressing structural changes, including the potential for system innovation, were beneficial. Simultaneously resolving innovation project actions with AIS actions remains a challenge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Julian Witjaksono

Innovation system as the added value for economic growth needs more attention not only on the national scale but also on the regional scale, particularly in agriculture. This study is the assessment of the innovation system particularly about the achievement of the agricultural innovation system in regional development. The research method was employed in 2015 by purposive sampling with the number of respondents was about 30. The respondents came from the stakeholders of farmers, university, private sector, and regional research institution. The sample area has been chosen in Konawe District, North Konawe District and East Kolaka as represent of this research. This paper aims to describe the data and information related to the evaluation worked on regional research and development institutions in supporting the innovation system. This assessment has shown that the development of the agricultural innovation system in regional autonomy faced some constraints and weaknesses, viz. Less synchronization, less coordination, lack of research funding, and less infrastructure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document