Analytic study for physical protection system (PPS) in nuclear power plants (NPPs)

2013 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 932-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Ho Woo
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Ho Woo

The dynamical assessment has been performed in the aspect of the nuclear power plants (NPPs) security. The physical protection system (PPS) is constructed by the cyber security evaluation tool (CSET) for the nuclear security assessment. The systems thinking algorithm is used for the quantifications by the Vensim software package. There is a period of 60 years which is the life time of NPPs' operation. The maximum possibility happens as 3.59 in the 30th year. The minimum value is done as 1.26 in the 55th year. The difference is about 2.85 times. The results of the case with time delay have shown that the maximum possibility of terror or sabotage incident happens as 447.42 in the 58th year and the minimum value happens as 89.77 in the 51st year. The difference is about 4.98 times. Hence, if the sabotage happens, the worst case is that the intruder can attack the target of the nuclear material in about one and a half hours. The general NPPs are modeled in the study and controlled by the systematic procedures.


Kerntechnik ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
T. Zeng ◽  
X. Yang ◽  
Y. Wan ◽  
Y. Mao ◽  
Z. Liu

Abstract The optimization measures in the physical protection system monitoring center of a nuclear power plant include the prioritization of alarm signals, optimization of sound and light alarm form, improvement of the layout of video monitor screen, security training, and strengthening of organizational management. Based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, the influence of these factors on the probability of alert assessment and guard’s respond time in the EASI method are quantitatively analyzed. Making full use of the measures for prioritization of alarm signals can effectively promote the improvement of human-computer interaction efficiency. The degree of influence of the four factors (guarder’s status, decision strategy, guarder’s training and organization management) on guard’s decision-making is roughly the same.


Author(s):  
Evgeny P. Velikhov ◽  
Vyacheslav P. Kuznetsov ◽  
Vladimir F. Demin

This paper presents the initial provisions, materials, results, current status and next tasks of the study dedicated to the issues of legal and institutional support of transportable nuclear power plants. This study is performed in the framework of the IAEA International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles INPRO. Transportable nuclear power plants (TNPPs) are either small nuclear power plants (SNPPs) with their lifecycle implemented on a single transportable platform, or SNPPs assembled of transportable factory-made modules. Advantages of SNPPs and TNPPs are: • Enhanced safety and reliability; • Design simplicity, • Shorter construction period; • Industrial serial production; • Smaller capital costs and shorter investment cycle compared with large NPP; • Possibility of autonomous operation; • Suitability for non-electric application and others. There is an objective evidence of growing interest in developing a nuclear energy system (NES) based on SNPPs including TNPPs. Underlying assumptions of the Russian study: • The User of TNPP services is interested in receiving energy only, does not claim ownership of nuclear technologies, materials and TNPP itself, and this incurs minimal liability for nuclear energy use; INPRO defines this TNPP lifecycle option as “Maximum outsourcing”; • All operations involving nuclear fuel are performed either at the TNPP manufacturer plant, or at a regional TNPP service center within the Holder’s liability zone; • TNPP sitting requires no onsite operations except assembling. Expert reviews have been performed to confirm TNPP lifecycle compliance with the nuclear legislation in fields such as: safety; non-proliferation; nuclear materials’ monitoring, accounting and control; physical protection; and civil liability for nuclear damage; transport operations. It was confirmed that: • In traditional approaches, the existing legal and institutional framework is sufficient for implementing TNPP lifecycle; to achieve the highest efficiency and safety of TNPPs it is necessary to develop TNPPs’ designs, their legal and institutional support; • The following issues are of immediate interest for further studies: combination of inherent safety features and passive safety systems in TNPPs; TNPP lifecycle economy; lifecycle concept without onsite refueling; new approaches to indemnification for nuclear damage; new approaches to physical protection; nuclear liability of TNPP User; remote nuclear materials monitoring, and control and TNPP’ operating; serial industrial fabrication; licensing and certification; public-private partnership; international personnel training system; international cooperation in TNPP fabrication and servicing; role of the IAEA in developing TNPP-based NES. • TNPP/SNPP-based nuclear energy system including all kinds of respective legal, institutional and infrastructural support should become the subject of further studies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Sergey A. Kulyukhin ◽  
Igor’ A. Rumer ◽  
Viktor M. Berkovich ◽  
Gennadii S. Taranov ◽  
Ivan V. Yagodkin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vladimir Munipov

The full story of the Chernobyl disaster is yet to be disclosed. The initial cause of the accident was a very unlikely violation of the operating procedure and conditions by the plant personnel which showed the design faults of the reactor and the control and protection system rods. The main or root cause of the accident was the inadequate design of the user-machine interaction. Many people involved with the reliability and safety of Nuclear Power Plants now believe that even if the operators had acted correctly their actions would have resulted in the explosion. The main lesson from the Chernobyl accident is that the Nuclear Age calls for a new culture and and can certainly not tolerate ignorance. Chernobyl is a severe warning of what can happen if people disregard the necessity of including ergonomics in the process of designing and operating complex technical facilities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-205
Author(s):  
V.I. Gavrilyuk ◽  
◽  
S.S. Drapej ◽  
B.V. Kaidyk ◽  
V.I. Kirischuk ◽  
...  

Two training technologies, developed and implemented by the George Kuzmich Training Center for Physical Protection, Accounting and Control of Nuclear Material of the Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the training process for advanced training in physical protection, are considered. The first is a training technology based on the use of the Training ground "Complex of engineering and technical means of a physical protection system", which enables students to acquire practical skills in operational management and technical operation of a complex engineering and technical means of a physical protection system. The second is a technology based on the use of the Interactive training complex "Nuclear Power Plant with elements of the physical protection system", which allows interactively checking the configurations of the nuclear power plant physical protection system proposed by the students for the presence of vulnerable routes to the targets of adversaries. The effectiveness of using these technologies in the training process is discussed, as well as the development and implementation of other modern training technologies by the Training Center.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document