Unsteady behavior of ventilated cavitating flows around an axisymmetric body

2021 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 109308
Author(s):  
Yafei Lv ◽  
Decai Kong ◽  
Mengjie Zhang ◽  
Taotao Liu ◽  
Biao Huang ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-li Hu ◽  
Guo-yo Wang ◽  
Biao Huang ◽  
Yu Zhao

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050020
Author(s):  
Zhangming Zhai ◽  
Tairan Chen ◽  
Haiyang Li

Modeling of unsteady cavitating flow is a critical issue in a lot of practical cases. The objective of this paper is to assess the practical applicability of three widely used mass transport cavitation models under RANS framework, including the Kubota model, Kunz model, and Singhal model, for predicting partial sheet cavitating flow around an axisymmetric body with hemispherical head and unsteady cloud cavitating flow around a Clark-Y hydrofoil. The results show that for the axisymmetric cylindrical body, all three cavitation models could generally predict the pressure distributions. The significant differences are found around the closure region of the attached cavity due to the magnitude and distribution of mass transfer rate. For the unsteady cavitating flow along the hydrofoil, the significant differences with different cavitation model are observed in time-averaged and time-dependent concerning the cavity shapes, multiphase structures and the cloud shedding dynamics. The Singhal model coupling the effect between the vorticity distribution and the cavity dynamics agrees best with the experimental measurements.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29-32 ◽  
pp. 2555-2562
Author(s):  
Xiao Hu ◽  
Ye Gao

Simulations on two-phase cavitating flows containing water and vapor, on axisymmetric body with disk cavitator have been implemented through the cavitation model in Fluent 6.2, the flow field around cavitator under different incoming conditions is studied respectively, and analyses to parameters pertinent to cavity including dimension, streamlines, vapor volume fractions and pressure distributions along the body surface are given when the incoming cavitation number ranges from 0.3 to 0.8, the results show that the vapor volume fraction and threshold phase-change pressure within the cavity under the same cavitation number gradually ascends as the Reynolds number increases ; the effects of incoming pressure on threshold phase-change pressure inside the cavity is insignificant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-79
Author(s):  
Vinay Kumar Gupta ◽  
Alok Khaware ◽  
K. V. S. S. Srikanth ◽  
Jay Sanyal

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-121
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Antonovich Bashkin ◽  
Ivan Vladimirovich Egorov ◽  
Ivan Valeryevich Ezhov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document