scholarly journals Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C Test Grids for Identifying Central Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma and Suspect Patients

Ophthalmology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Phu ◽  
Michael Kalloniatis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Field Defects

scholarly journals Central Visual Field Defects in Patients with Distinct Glaucomatous Optic Disc Phenotypes

2021 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 229-240
Author(s):  
Eren Ekici ◽  
Sasan Moghimi ◽  
Huiyuan Hou ◽  
James Proudfoot ◽  
Linda M. Zangwill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Optic Disc ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Field Defects

Agreement between Compass Fundus Perimeter New Grid and 10-2 Testing Protocols for Detecting Central Visual Field Defects

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nevin W. El-Nimri ◽  
Rafaella C. Penteado ◽  
Christopher Bowd ◽  
James A. Proudfoot ◽  
Huiyuan Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Testing Protocols ◽  
Field Defects

Quantitative analysis of central visual field defects in macular edema using three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid testing

2008 ◽  
Vol 247 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renu V. Jivrajka ◽  
Janet K. Kim ◽  
Wolfgang Fink ◽  
Alfredo A. Sadun ◽  
J. Sebag
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Amsler Grid ◽  
Field Defects

scholarly journals Agreement Between 10-2 and 24-2C Visual Field Test Protocols for Detecting Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Tutul Chakravarti ◽  
Mohamad Moghadam ◽  
James A. Proudfoot ◽  
Robert N. Weinreb ◽  
Christopher Bowd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Field Test ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Test ◽  
Field Defects

Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects

Ophthalmology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 737-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Su ◽  
Andrew Greenberg ◽  
Joseph L. Simonson ◽  
Christopher C. Teng ◽  
Jeffrey M. Liebmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Amsler Grid ◽  
Field Defects ◽  
Grid Test

Effect of peripapillary tilt direction and magnitude on central visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma with high myopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 414-422
Author(s):  
Shinichi Usui ◽  
Yasushi Ikuno ◽  
Tomoko Asai ◽  
Tsutomu Kikawa ◽  
Masahiro Akiba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
High Myopia ◽  
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Open Angle Glaucoma ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Open Angle ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Field Defects

scholarly journals Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e0186793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Roberti ◽  
Gianluca Manni ◽  
Ivano Riva ◽  
Gabor Holló ◽  
Luciano Quaranta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Field Defects ◽  
Octopus Perimetry

scholarly journals Modern Technologies in the Examination of Patients with Optic Nerve Atrophy Due to Multiple Sclerosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2S) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Ioyleva ◽  
M. S. Krivosheeva ◽  
E. Yu. Markova
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Optic Nerve ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Field Defects ◽  
Functional Disorders ◽  
Optic Nerve Atrophy ◽  
Central Visual Field ◽  
Mean Sensitivity ◽  
Field Defects ◽  
Central Fixation

Purpose: to develop an algorithm for testing patients with optic nerve atrophy due to MS using microperimetry with the different functional disorders.Patients and Methods. There were 20 patients (40 eyes) with the correct diagnosis of MS at the age of 33 ± 1.88 years in the study. The BCVA was from 0.1 to 1.0. Microperimetry was done on MP-1 (Nidek technologies, Vigonza, Italy) with the definition of mean sensitivity, stability and type of fixation. We chose the parameters of microperimetry: the research program, the size of the stimulus, the fixation mark and the test mode.Results. The best program for diagnosing central visual field defects was the program macula 12° 10 dB, for paracentral visual field defects – retina 40° 20 dB. The testing was conducted by using a standard stimulus Goldmann III, mark and survey mode is selected individually, according at the various types of functional disorders. The visual acuity was from 0.1 to 0.4 in 11 eyes with optic nerve atrophy. There were revealed absolute or relative defects of the central field of vision and the decreasing of mean sensitivity to 8.21 ± 2.3 dB, unstable central fixation — 71.18 ± 10, 3%. In 29 eyes with optic nerve atrophy and visual acuity 0.5–1.0 have been identified relative small central visual field defects and paracentral visual field defects in the inferior side with a decrease in sensitivity to 15,32 ± 0,84 dB in the area of 6° from the fixing point, stable central fixation 88,96 ± 2,9%.Conclusion. The authors developed an algorithm for testing patients with optic nerve atrophy due to MS. Using the algorithm identified the central and paracentral visual field defects with the decrease in the mean sensitivity. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document