Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of Medial-pivot and Posterior-stablized total knee arthroplasty during 8 years follow-up. Methods 109 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty were conducted and divided into two groups according to the choice of prosthesis,49 in the Medial-pivot(MP) group and 60 in the Postirior-stabilized(PS) group.There were no statistical differences in age,gender,BMI,operative side and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05).The same protocol of perioperative treatment was adopted in both groups. Comparison of clinical outcome and survival rates were acquired through minimum 8 years follow-up. Results The prosthesis survival rate andthe excellent and good rate of MP group were 93.9% and 88.9% during average 8.3 years follow-up period,versus the prosthesis survival rate and the excellent or good rate of PS group were 93.3% and 86.7% during average 8.4 years follow-up period.There were no statistical diferences in survival rate,excellent and good rate and radiolucency of weight-bearing areas between the two groups ( P >0.05). There were no statistical differences in range of motion,KSS score and WOMAC index between the two groups preoperatively (P>0.05).The range of motion at all follow-up time points and KSS score at 6 months postoperatively of PS group were superior than those of MP group ( P <0.05),while the WOMAC index at 8 years postoperatively and Kujala scores at 1year and 8 years postoperatively of PS group were better than those of MP group( P <0.05). Conclusion Either medial-pivot or post-stabilized total knee arthroplasty could obtain excellent or good mid-term clinical result. Although with less range of motion, the patients using MP prosthesis could obtain better results in bone loss, performance of the patellofemoral joint and mid-term satisfaction. However, the use of MP prosthesis required more professional and precise technology and it should be cautious when using for knees with severe valgus deformation.