scholarly journals Volumetric assessment of extrusion in medial meniscus posterior root tears through semi-automatic segmentation on 3-tesla magnetic resonance images

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-968
Author(s):  
Changwan Kim ◽  
Seong-Il Bin ◽  
Bum-Sik Lee ◽  
Won-Joon Cho ◽  
June-Goo Lee ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuya Kodama ◽  
Takayuki Furumatsu ◽  
Yusuke Kamatsuki ◽  
Takaaki Hiranaka ◽  
Tomohiro Takahata ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To verify the effectiveness of detecting medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) using weight-bearing posterior-anterior (PA) radiographs. Materials and methods Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with an MMPRT using magnetic resonance imaging (Group A), with 23 matched individuals forming the control group (Group B). The distance between medial tibial eminence and the lateral edge of the medial femoral condyle (MTE–MFC distance) and medial joint space (MJS) width were measured on weight-bearing PA radiographs, with the knee flexed at 45° (Rosenberg view). Absolute medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was measured on magnetic resonance images. Results The MTE–MFC distance was greater and the MJS width was smaller in Group A than Group B (7.7 ± 1.7 mm versus 6.0 ± 1.24 mm and 3.2 ± 0.8 mm versus 4.5 ± 0.7 mm, respectively; P < 0.05). The MTE–MFC distance and MJS width correlated with MME (r = 0.603 and 0.579, respectively; P < 0.05), and the extent of MME was greater in Group A than Group B (4.1 ± 1.1 mm versus 1.8 ± 1.5 mm, respectively; P < 0.05). Conclusions MMPRTs increase the MTE–MFC distance and decrease the MJS width, with these measurements correlating to the MME. Therefore, measurement of the MTE–MFC distance and MJS width on the Rosenberg view could be a useful preliminary method for the diagnosis of an MMPRT. Level of evidence IV


Author(s):  
Vitoantonio Bevilacqua ◽  
Antonio Brunetti ◽  
Giacomo Donato Cascarano ◽  
Andrea Guerriero ◽  
Francesco Pesce ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The automatic segmentation of kidneys in medical images is not a trivial task when the subjects undergoing the medical examination are affected by Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). Several works dealing with the segmentation of Computed Tomography images from pathological subjects were proposed, showing high invasiveness of the examination or requiring interaction by the user for performing the segmentation of the images. In this work, we propose a fully-automated approach for the segmentation of Magnetic Resonance images, both reducing the invasiveness of the acquisition device and not requiring any interaction by the users for the segmentation of the images. Methods Two different approaches are proposed based on Deep Learning architectures using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for the semantic segmentation of images, without needing to extract any hand-crafted features. In details, the first approach performs the automatic segmentation of images without any procedure for pre-processing the input. Conversely, the second approach performs a two-steps classification strategy: a first CNN automatically detects Regions Of Interest (ROIs); a subsequent classifier performs the semantic segmentation on the ROIs previously extracted. Results Results show that even though the detection of ROIs shows an overall high number of false positives, the subsequent semantic segmentation on the extracted ROIs allows achieving high performance in terms of mean Accuracy. However, the segmentation of the entire images input to the network remains the most accurate and reliable approach showing better performance than the previous approach. Conclusion The obtained results show that both the investigated approaches are reliable for the semantic segmentation of polycystic kidneys since both the strategies reach an Accuracy higher than 85%. Also, both the investigated methodologies show performances comparable and consistent with other approaches found in literature working on images from different sources, reducing both the invasiveness of the analyses and the interaction needed by the users for performing the segmentation task.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Angelié ◽  
P. J. H. de Koning ◽  
M. G. Danilouchkine ◽  
H. C. van Assen ◽  
G. Koning ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 220 (6) ◽  
pp. 3259-3272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Rhindress ◽  
Toshikazu Ikuta ◽  
Robin Wellington ◽  
Anil K. Malhotra ◽  
Philip R. Szeszko

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document