Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The Five-Factor Model and the Dark Triad

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary L. DeShong ◽  
DeMond M. Grant ◽  
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt
Semiotica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Candel

Abstract While there are interesting connections between literature and evil, there is as of yet no systematic collection of models of evil to study literature. This is problematic, since literature is among other things an evaluative discourse and the most basic evaluative category is the polarity of good versus evil. In addition, evil shows important affinities with basic narratological principles. To initiate a discussion of models of evil for the analysis of literature, this article organizes a dozen models of evil into four groups. The first consists of a core model which coincides with basic narratological elements in character analysis and narrative tension. The second group contains two pre-modern models of evil, defilement and moral-natural evil. The third group takes its cue from personality theory and proposes the five-factor model of personality and an enriched “dark triad,” and, to balance description against narration, a model which categorizes kinds of murder. The last group organizes six models around the thematic opposition between nature and society, an opposition which forms the backbone of Western philosophy and narrative. To test their validity, the models are applied to a series of literary examples/characters, above all Grendel (Beowulf), Browning’s “My Last Duchess,” and Carol Oates’ short story “Heat.”


2018 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley C. Helle ◽  
Hilary L. DeShong ◽  
Gregory J. Lengel ◽  
Neil A. Meyer ◽  
Jaiden Butler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 218-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary L. DeShong ◽  
Ashley C. Helle ◽  
Gregory J. Lengel ◽  
Neil Meyer ◽  
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

Assessment ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 107319112110680
Author(s):  
Leigha Rose ◽  
Joshua D. Miller ◽  
Donald R. Lynam

The personality constructs psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism, collectively described as the Dark Triad (DT), all reference socially aversive behavioral tendencies. Each construct is theorized to have features that differentiate it from others. Unfortunately, existing measures of the DT suffer from several problems. The present study compared newly developed measures of psychopathy (Super-Short Form of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment), narcissism (Super-Short Form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory), and Machiavellianism (Super-Short Form of the Five-Factor Machiavellianism Inventory [FFMI-SSF] based on the Five-Factor Model of personality)—collectively referred to as the Five-Factor Model Antagonistic Triad Measure—to existing DT inventories using a sample of undergraduate students ( N = 516). As predicted, FFMI-SSF showed better divergence from measures of psychopathy and better convergence with the expert Five-Factor Model (FFM) Machiavellianism profile than did existing Machiavellianism measures. Results also demonstrated that the factors within each FFM assessment manifested differentiated correlational profiles, underscoring the utility of the multifaceted assessment of these three constructs. In addition, the use of the FFM as the basis for the new DT measures provides a pathway for the integration of DT research into the larger field of basic and clinical personality science.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brinkley M. Sharpe ◽  
Katherine Collison ◽  
Donald Lynam ◽  
Josh Miller

Machiavellianism is a personality construct characterized by cynicism, callousness, and skillful manipulation of others to achieve personal gains. We review the Machiavellianism literature with a particular focus on its measurement alongside narcissism and psychopathy in the so-called “Dark Triad” (DT). We discuss criticisms of Machiavellianism on the grounds of insufficient construct validity as well as its virtual indistinguishability from psychopathy when assessed by commonly used instruments. As a response to these criticisms, we offer the super-short form of the Five Factor Machiavellianism Inventory (FFMI-SSF) as an alternative. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the FFMI-SSF in relation to psychopathy and basic personality traits (i.e., the Five Factor Model) and to compare it to widely used measures of the DT and psychopathy in a large undergraduate sample (n = 1,004).


2020 ◽  
pp. 003232172091156
Author(s):  
Philip Chen ◽  
Scott Pruysers ◽  
Julie Blais

Personality traits are one piece in the larger puzzle of political participation, but most studies focus on the Five-Factor Model of personality. We argue that the normative implications of the influence of personality on politics are increased when the personality traits being studied correlate with negative social behaviors. We investigate the role of the Dark Triad on political participation as mediated through political beliefs such as interest and knowledge. We find that Psychopathy and Narcissism are positively associated with political interest, but Narcissism is also negatively associated with political knowledge. In addition, both Psychopathy and Narcissism exert a direct, positive influence on participation. Our results imply that individuals exhibiting higher levels of Narcissism are not only less knowledgeable but also more interested in politics and more likely to participate when given the opportunity.


Psychology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Douglas ◽  
Miles Bore ◽  
Don Munro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document