Utilizing Five Factor Model facets to conceptualize counterproductive, unethical, and organizational citizenship workplace behaviors

2018 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley C. Helle ◽  
Hilary L. DeShong ◽  
Gregory J. Lengel ◽  
Neil A. Meyer ◽  
Jaiden Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Workplace Behaviors

Development of a Measure of Calculative Mindset (CM): Establishing a Nomological Net and Predictive Utility of the CM Measure

2021 ◽  
pp. 003329412110102
Author(s):  
Joongseo Kim ◽  
I. M. Jawahar ◽  
Brigitte Steinheider ◽  
Thomas Stone ◽  
Brandon Ferrell
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Work Behavior ◽  
Hierarchical Regression ◽  
Organizational Contexts ◽  
Personality Research

A calculative mindset (CM) describes the tendency to analyze and convert qualitative social values into numeric or monetary metrics and is a predisposition that shapes behaviors and actions of the employee. CM has been manipulated in experimental studies, but it has not been investigated in field research due to the absence of a scale to measure CM. In study 1, we followed Hinkin’s scale development protocol to conceptualize, develop, and validate a measure of CM to facilirate research in organizational contexts. In Study 2, we examined the relationship between CM and measures of performance, counterproductive work behavior (CWB), organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB), and in role-performance (IRP). Results from hierarchical regression analyses indicate that CM is related to these performance outcomes and explains incremental variance over established measures of the Five-Factor Model of personality. Implications for personality research, selection of human resources, and facilitation of an ethical workplace are discussed.

The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 1140-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Chiaburu ◽  
In-Sue Oh ◽  
Christopher M. Berry ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Richard G. Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Organizational Citizenship Behaviors ◽  
Citizenship Behaviors

Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Current Research and Future Directions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Chiaburu ◽  
In-Sue Oh ◽  
Sophia V. Marinova
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Organizational Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Criterion Space

For over a quarter of a century, organizational scholars have sought to understand the ways in which employees contribute to organizational success through their organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Concurrently, personality traits have provided an important lens for illuminating what motivates such discretionary efforts. Our first purpose is to provide a state-of-the art, theoretically grounded review of the literature linking five-factor model (FFM) of personality traits to OCB. Second, we strive to clarify both our criterion construct (OCB) and our predictor space in order to facilitate the integration of past research and pave the way for future research. For our criterion space, we focus on three prominent types of OCB: directed toward individuals (OCB-I), toward the organization (OCB-O), and toward change (OCB-CH). For our predictor space, we examine FFM personality traits and FFM-based dark-side personality traits. Third, we offer new fruitful directions for future research. We conclude with three key themes for future research.

scholarly journals An Examination Of Organizational Citizenship Behavior In An Academic Setting From The Perspective Of The Five Factor Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Willard G. Broucek
Keyword(s):  
Student Satisfaction ◽  
Organizational Citizenship ◽  
Organizational Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Citizenship Behavior ◽  
Academic Setting ◽  
Latent Construct

This paper examines the dispositional causes of student organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) in an academic setting by utilizing facets scales of the NEO-PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992) in addition to the five broad dimensions of the five factor model of personality. Different facet scales were significantly related to organizational citizenship and to student satisfaction. The strongest predictor of OCB was found to be warmth, a facet of extraversion. This finding supported the contention of Lepine, et al. (2002) that OCB can best be conceptualized as a latent construct measuring cooperativeness.

Social Desirability in Personality Inventories

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bäckström ◽  
Fredrik Björklund
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Peer Ratings ◽  
Personality Inventories ◽  
Model Study ◽  
The Difference ◽  
New Variables

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.

Construction and Validation of a Short Adjectives Checklist to Measure Big Five (SACBIF)

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Perugini ◽  
Luigi Leone
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Selection Procedure ◽  
Factorial Structure ◽  
Personality Dimensions

The aim of this contribution is to present a new short adjective-based measure of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality, the Short Adjectives Checklist of BIg Five (SACBIF). We present the various steps of the construction and the validation of this instrument. First, 50 adjectives were selected with a selection procedure, the “Lining Up Technique” (LUT), specifically used to identify the best factorial markers of the FFM. Then, the factorial structure and the psychometric properties of the SACBIF were investigated. Finally, the SACBIF factorial structure was correlated with some main measures of the FFM to establish its construct validity and with some other personality dimensions to investigate how well these dimensions could be represented in the SACBIF factorial space.

Factorial Invariance of Child Self-Report Across English and Spanish Language Groups in a Hispanic Population Utilizing the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Newman ◽  
Christine A. Limbers ◽  
James W. Varni
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Services ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Factorial Invariance ◽  
Spanish Language ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Hispanic Population ◽  
Language Groups ◽  
Related Quality

The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children has witnessed significant international growth over the past decade in an effort to improve pediatric health and well-being, and to determine the value of health-care services. In order to compare international HRQOL research findings across language groups, it is important to demonstrate factorial invariance, i.e., that the items have an equivalent meaning across the language groups studied. This study examined the factorial invariance of child self-reported HRQOL across English- and Spanish-language groups in a Hispanic population of 2,899 children ages 8–18 utilizing the 23-item PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed specifying a five-factor model across language groups. The findings support an equivalent 5-factor structure across English- and Spanish-language groups. Based on these data, it can be concluded that children across the two languages studied interpreted the instrument in a similar manner. The multigroup CFA statistical methods utilized in the present study have important implications for cross-cultural assessment research in children in which different language groups are compared.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document