scholarly journals Patients’ perception of their involvement in shared treatment decision making: Key factors in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Veilleux ◽  
Isabelle Noiseux ◽  
Nathalie Lachapelle ◽  
Rita Kohen ◽  
Luc Vachon ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Li Yang ◽  
Xiaomei Song ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Yue Li ◽  
Yubei Gu ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising in China, and the tendency for lifelong recurrence decreases patients’ quality of life. However, no studies on treatment decision-making in Chinese patients with IBD exist. Thus, this study aimed to determine the actual and ideal decision-making as well as factors affecting decision-making in Chinese IBD patients. METHODS A multi-center online questionnaire was distributed among patients diagnosed with IBD. To assess factors that influence treatment decision-making, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS From March 20, 2018, to May 20, 2018, 866 patients completed the questionnaires, including 222 patients with ulcerative colitis, 588 patients with Crohn’s disease and 56 patients with unclassified IBD. There was a significant difference between ideal and actual decision-making in Chinese IBD patients (P ˂ .005). The factors affecting ideal decision-making included income, education, illness severity, religiosity, the importance of the treatment decision, the employment situation, and occupation area. The factors affecting actual decision-making included age, illness severity, religiosity, the employment situation, economic anxiety, concern about the side effects, and the importance of the treatment decision. CONCLUSION There is a significant difference between ideal and actual decision-making in IBD patients in China. That is, the economy, religiosity, illness severity, and concern about the side effects of treatment are the most important factors affecting treatment decisions in Chinese IBD patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 2636-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey A. Siegel ◽  
Jennifer H. Lofland ◽  
Ahmad Naim ◽  
Jan Gollins ◽  
Danielle M. Walls ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Andkhoie ◽  
Desneige Meyer ◽  
Michael Szafron

Introduction: The purpose of this research is to gather, collate, and identify key factors commonly studied in localized prostate cancer (LPC) treatment decision-making in Canada and the U.S.Methods: This scoping review uses five databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycInfo) to identify relevant articles using a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria applied by two reviewers. A list of topics describing the themes of the articles was extracted and key factors were identified using principal component analysis (PCA). A word cloud of titles and abstracts of the relevant articles was created to identify complementary results to the PCA.Results: This review identified 77 relevant articles describing 32 topics related to LPC treatment decision-making. The PCA grouped these 32 topics into five key factors commonly studied in LPC treatment decision-making: 1) treatment type; 2) socioeconomic/demographic characteristics; 3) personal reasons for treatment choice; 4) psychology of treatment decision experience; and 5) level of involvement in the decision-making process. The word cloud identified common phrases that were complementary to the factors identified through the PCA.Conclusions: This research identifies several possible factors impacting LPC treatment decision-making. Further research needs to be completed to determine the impact that these factors have in the LPC treatment decision-making experience.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Myung Cha ◽  
Dong Il Park ◽  
Sang Hyoung Park ◽  
Jeong Eun Shin ◽  
Wan Soo Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document