This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 201586, “Effect of Silica Nanoparticles on Oil Recovery During Alternating Injection With Low-Salinity Water and Surfactant Into Carbonate Reservoirs,” by Saheed Olawale Olayiwola, SPE, and Morteza Dejam, SPE, University of Wyoming, prepared for the 2020 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Denver, Colorado, 5–7 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed.
Although the potential of nanoparticles (NPs) to improve oil recovery is promising, their effect during alternating injection is still uncertain. The main objective of the authors’ study is to investigate the best recovery mechanisms during alternating injection of NPs, low-salinity water (LSW), and surfactant and transform the results into field-scale technology. The outcome of these experiments revealed that tertiary injection of NPs results in additional oil recovery beyond the limits of LSW.
Introduction
A series of coreflooding experiments was conducted using several cores with an effective permeability of approximately 1 md to the brine at a temperature and pressure of 70°C and 3,000 psi. The study performs four different alternating injections of NPs with LSW and surfactant to determine optimal oil recovery. The wettability of the rock and fluid and the interfacial tension (IFT) of oil and water are measured to understand the mechanisms of interactions between the fluids and the reservoir rock.
Materials
A 12×12×12-in. block taken from an outcrop of Indiana limestone reservoir was purchased for this study. Four core plugs with a diameter of 1.5 in., used for the coreflooding experiments, were selected from this block. A synthetic 100,000-ppm (10 wt%) brine was prepared in the laboratory by dissolving sodium chloride (NaCl) and calcium chloride with a ratio of 4:1 in deionized water. The crude oil used in this study was a volatile oil (properties are described in Table 2 of the complete paper) obtained from the Permian Basin in Texas.
Injected Fluids. A 10,000-ppm (1 wt%) LSW was prepared by diluting the synthetic brine 10 times. The surfactant solutions were prepared from an anionic sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) surfactant. A 1,000-ppm (0.1 wt%) surfactant solution used throughout the experiments was selected on the basis of the estimated critical micelle concentration of 600 to 2,240 ppm for SDS and nanofluid/NaCl. The concentration of silica NPs used in this study was 500 ppm (0.05 wt%). The nanofluids were pre-pared either as a simple solution or as a mixture with other chemicals to make a concentration of 500-ppm silica NPs.
Coreflooding System. The established coreflooding system used for this experimental study was custom-made to determine the oil recovery and the relative permeabilities at steady-state and unsteady-state flows. However, the focus of this study is to investigate the effect of silica NPs on oil recovery. The schematic diagram of the coreflooding system is shown in Fig. 1.
Impact of Low Salinity Water Injection on CO2 Storage and Oil Recovery for Improved CO2 Utilization
