Magnetization reversal of periodic arrays of magnetic elements

2004 ◽  
Vol 345 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Theis-Bröhl
Keyword(s):  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Periodic Arrays ◽  
Magnetic Elements

scholarly journals Electron Holography of Nanostructured Magnetic Materials

1999 ◽  
Vol 589 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski ◽  
B. Kardynal ◽  
M. R. Mccartney ◽  
M. R. Scheinfein ◽  
David J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Materials ◽  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Electron Holography ◽  
Magnetic Elements

AbstractOff-axis electron holography and micromagnetic calculations that involve solutions to the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations are used to study magnetization reversal processes in lithographically patterned submicron-sized Co and Co/Au/Ni magnetic elements.

Evolution of magnetization reversal on patterned magnetic elements

2000 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 2978-2980 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Wu ◽  
H.W. Huang ◽  
Te-Ho Wu
Keyword(s):  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Magnetic Elements

Influence of magnetostatic interactions on the magnetization reversal of patterned magnetic elements

2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 07D354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xioalu Yin ◽  
S. H. Liou ◽  
A. O. Adeyeye ◽  
S. Jain ◽  
Baoshan Han
Keyword(s):  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Magnetic Elements ◽  
Magnetostatic Interactions

scholarly journals Micromagnetism and magnetization reversal of micron-scale (110) Fe thin-film magnetic elements

1999 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 7352-7358 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yu ◽  
U. Rüdiger ◽  
A. D. Kent ◽  
L. Thomas ◽  
S. S. P. Parkin
Keyword(s):  
Thin Film ◽  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Magnetic Elements

High-resolution x-ray analysis of dislocation networks nn tilt boundaries

1988 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 612-613
Author(s):  
J. R. Michael ◽  
C. H. Lin ◽  
S. L. Sass
Keyword(s):  
Grain Boundaries ◽  
Analytical Electron Microscopy ◽  
Solute Segregation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Periodic Arrays ◽  
Analytical Electron ◽  
Primary Dislocation ◽  
Tilt Boundaries ◽  
Polycrystalline Solids ◽  
Twist Boundaries

The segregation of solute atoms to grain boundaries in polycrystalline solids can be responsible for embrittlement of the grain boundaries. Although Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and analytical electron microscopy (AEM) have verified the occurrence of solute segregation to grain boundaries, there has been little experimental evidence concerning the distribution of the solute within the plane of the interface. Sickafus and Sass showed that Au segregation causes a change in the primary dislocation structure of small angle [001] twist boundaries in Fe. The bicrystal specimens used in their work, which contain periodic arrays of dislocations to which Au is segregated, provide an excellent opportunity to study the distribution of Au within the boundary by AEM.The thin film Fe-0.8 at% Au bicrystals (composition determined by Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy), ∼60 nm thick, containing [001] twist boundaries were prepared as described previously. The bicrystals were analyzed in a Vacuum Generators HB-501 AEM with a field emission electron source and a Link Analytical windowless x-ray detector.

Quasiperiodic interfaces: HREM observations of grain and phase boundaries

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-333
Author(s):  
K. L. Merkle
Keyword(s):  
Atomic Structure ◽  
Direct Determination ◽  
Lattice Parameter ◽  
Atomic Scale ◽  
Misfit Dislocations ◽  
Oxide Systems ◽  
Atomic Structures ◽  
Periodic Arrays ◽  
Parameter Ratio ◽  
Metal Metal

The atomic structures of internal interfaces have recently received considerable attention, not only because of their importance in determining many materials properties, but also because the atomic structure of many interfaces has become accessible to direct atomic-scale observation by modem HREM instruments. In this communication, several interface structures are examined by HREM in terms of their structural periodicities along the interface.It is well known that heterophase boundaries are generally formed by two low-index planes. Often, as is the case in many fcc metal/metal and metal/metal-oxide systems, low energy boundaries form in the cube-on-cube orientation on (111). Since the lattice parameter ratio between the two materials generally is not a rational number, such boundaries are incommensurate. Therefore, even though periodic arrays of misfit dislocations have been observed by TEM techniques for numerous heterophase systems, such interfaces are quasiperiodic on an atomic scale. Interfaces with misfit dislocations are semicoherent, where atomically well-matched regions alternate with regions of misfit. When the misfit is large, misfit localization is often difficult to detect, and direct determination of the atomic structure of the interface from HREM alone, may not be possible.

Electron Microscope study of commensurate-incommensurate phase transition in BaZnGeO4

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-173
Author(s):  
Naoki Yamamoto ◽  
Makoto Kikuchi ◽  
Tooru Atake ◽  
Akihiro Hamano ◽  
Yasutoshi Saito
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Electron Microscope Study ◽  
Room Temperature ◽  
Hexagonal Lattice ◽  
Ferroelectric Materials ◽  
Temperature Phase ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Periodic Arrays ◽  
Modulation Wave Vector

BaZnGeO4 undergoes many phase transitions from I to V phase. The highest temperature phase I has a BaAl2O4 type structure with a hexagonal lattice. Recent X-ray diffraction study showed that the incommensurate (IC) lattice modulation appears along the c axis in the III and IV phases with a period of about 4c, and a commensurate (C) phase with a modulated period of 4c exists between the III and IV phases in the narrow temperature region (—58°C to —47°C on cooling), called the III' phase. The modulations in the IC phases are considered displacive type, but the detailed structures have not been studied. It is also not clear whether the modulation changes into periodic arrays of discommensurations (DC’s) near the III-III' and IV-V phase transition temperature as found in the ferroelectric materials such as Rb2ZnCl4.At room temperature (III phase) satellite reflections were seen around the fundamental reflections in a diffraction pattern (Fig.1) and they aligned along a certain direction deviated from the c* direction, which indicates that the modulation wave vector q tilts from the c* axis. The tilt angle is about 2 degree at room temperature and depends on temperature.

Determination of eddy current losses and hysteresis losses in magnetic circuits of electrical machines

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
S. M. Plotnikov
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Eddy Currents ◽  
Technical Problem ◽  
Electrical Machines ◽  
Eddy Current Losses ◽  
Hysteresis Losses ◽  
Magnetic Circuits ◽  
Core Losses ◽  
Reversal Frequency

The division of the total core losses in the electrical steel of the magnetic circuit into two components – losses dueto hysteresis and eddy currents – is a serious technical problem, the solution of which will effectively design and construct electrical machines with magnetic circuits having low magnetic losses. In this regard, an important parameter is the exponent α, with which the frequency of magnetization reversal is included in the total losses in steel. Theoretically, this indicator can take values from 1 to 2. Most authors take α equal to 1.3, which corresponds to the special case when the eddy current losses are three times higher than the hysteresis losses. In fact, for modern electrical steels, the opposite is true. To refine the index α, an attempt was made to separate the total core losses on the basis that the hysteresis component is proportional to the first degree of the magnetization reversal frequency, and the eddy current component is proportional to the second degree. In the article, the calculation formulas of these components are obtained, containing the values of the total losses measured in idling experiments at two different frequencies, and the ratio of these frequencies. It is shown that the rational frequency ratio is within 1.2. Presented the graphs and expressions to determine the exponent α depending on the measured no-load losses and the frequency of magnetization reversal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document