Validity and reliability of an android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion

Physiotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. e1244
Author(s):  
J. Quek ◽  
S.G. Brauer ◽  
J. Treleaven ◽  
R.A. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of Veloflex to measure active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11228
Author(s):  
Germán Cánovas-Ambit ◽  
José A. García-Vidal ◽  
Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín ◽  
Aurelio Arenas Dalla-Vecchia ◽  
Mariana Sánchez-Barbadora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Intra Class Correlation ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Active Range Of Motion ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement

Background Neck pain has a high annual incidence and decreases the cervical active range of motion (ROM). Clinicians use various methods to evaluate cervical range of motion (CROM) that some of them have also been proposed to give instant feedback. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of Veloflex (VF) to measure the CROM by comparison with the cervical range of motion (CROM) device, and to examine their test-retest reliability. Methods Thirty-eight healthy and 20 symptomatic participants were evaluated. Cervical flexion-extension, side bending, and rotations were tested in two sessions, first by the CROM and VF and in the second only with the VF. To evaluate the concurrent validity and agreement between CROM and VF, Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Bland–Altmann plots were used. Reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Results CROM and VF showed excellent correlation for all movements (r > 0.960). Both devices provided small mean ‘bias’ (≤1.29%) in all movements regarding CROM measures. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the VF was excellent (ICC > 0.98). SEMs ranging from 0.72% to 2.38% and the MDC ranging from 1.22° to 2.60° in all participants. The results support the validity and reliability of VF to measure CROM. For its use, with a basic training is enough to get reliable measurements.

scholarly journals Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda ◽  
Agnieszka Guzik ◽  
Paulina Mocur ◽  
Mariusz Drużbicki ◽  
Andrzej Maciejczak
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
University Students ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Daily Clinical Practice ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Intrarater Reliability ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Motion Measurements

Purpose. The current study was designed to assess interrater and intrarater validity of cervical range of motion measurements performed with a CROM goniometer. Material and Methods. The study involved 95 healthy university students (31 males and 64 females) aged 20-24 years. Two examiners performed measurements of cervical range of motion using a CROM goniometer. The same subjects were examined again after two weeks, in the same conditions. The results acquired by one rater during the first and the second examination were compared for reproducibility, while the results obtained by the two examiners were compared to assess validity and reliability of the tool. Cronbach’s alpha was applied to determine intrarater reliability, and the values of correlations were used to assess the interrater agreement. Results. Analysis of the results showed both intrarater and interrater agreement in all the measures of cervical range of motion. The highest intrarater and interrater concordance was observed in the measure of extension. Intrarater agreement for Examiner 1 was reflected by Cronbach’s alpha=0.85, and for Examiner 2 by Cronbach’s alpha=0.89. As for the interrater agreement in the measure of extension, the value of correlation in both the first and the second measurement amounted to r=0.89. Conclusions. Measurements performed with the CROM goniometer show interrater and intrarater agreement in assessments of cervical range of motion. The CROM goniometer can be recommended for use in daily clinical practice.

Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense in individuals with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Emin Ulas Erdem ◽  
Banu Ünver ◽  
Eda Akbas ◽  
Gizem Irem Kinikli
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Position Error ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Neck Function

BACKGROUND: Performing thoracic manipulations for neck pain can result in immediate improvements in neck function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense and cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain. METHODS: Eighty male volunteers between 18–25 years and having chronic or recurrent neck or shoulder pain of at least 3 months duration with or without arm pain were randomized into two groups: Thoracic Manipulation Group (TMG:50) and Control Group (CG:30), with a pretest-posttest experimental design. The TMG was treated with thoracic extension manipulation while the CG received no intervention. Cervical joint position error and cervical range of motion of the individuals were assessed at baseline and 5 minutes later. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic variables such as age (p= 0.764), Body Mass Index (p= 0.917) and Neck Pain Disability Scale (NPDS) scores (p= 0.436) at baseline outcomes between TMG and CGs. Joint position error outcomes between the two groups following intervention were similar in all directions at 30 and 50 degrees. Differences in range of motion following intervention in neck flexion (p< 0.001) and right rotation (p= 0.004) were higher in TMG compared to CG. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of thoracic manipulation seems to be inefficient on joint position sense in individuals with mild mechanical neck pain. However, thoracic manipulation might be an effective option to increase flexion and rotation of the cervical region as an adjunctive to treatment.

Kann eine herausnehmbare Zahnspange Auswirkungen auf die HWS-Beweglichkeit haben?

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (05) ◽  
pp. 228-237
Author(s):  
Mandy Scheunchen ◽  
Dieter Müßig
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion

ZusammenfassungDiese Studie untersuchte die Auswirkungen eines funktionskieferorthopädischen Geräts auf die Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. In der Vorbereitungsphase der Studie wurden relevante Kriterien definiert, ein Frage- und Untersuchungsbogen entwickelt sowie ein Konzept zur Umsetzung in einer kieferorthopädischen Fachpraxis konzipiert. Die Messungen erfolgten bei 20 jugendlichen Probanden zu 3 verschiedenen Zeitpunkten (Tag 1, nach 6 Wochen, nach 6 Monaten).Nach 6 Monaten hatte sich die Flexion signifikant verringert. Außerdem wurde festgestellt, dass das Ausmaß der vertikalen Sperrung und des Overbites sowie das skelettale und chronologische Alter signifikanten Einfluss auf die CROM hatten.Das beschriebene Konzept dient als Vorstudie für weitere Studien mit größerem Umfang.

The Effects of Muscle Energy Technique on Cervical Range of Motion

1994 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Schenk ◽  
Kimberly Adelman ◽  
John Rousselle
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Muscle Energy Technique ◽  
Muscle Energy

Criterion Validity Study of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Device for Rotational Range of Motion on Healthy Adults

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 242-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Tousignant ◽  
Cécile Smeesters ◽  
Anne-Marie Breton ◽  
Émilie Breton ◽  
Hélène Corriveau
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Criterion Validity ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion

Validity and reliability of a wearable-controlled serious game and goniometer for telemonitoring of wrist fracture rehabilitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriëtte A. W. Meijer ◽  
Maurits Graafland ◽  
Miryam C. Obdeijn ◽  
Marlies P. Schijven ◽  
J. Carel Goslings
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Internal Validity ◽  
Wrist Fracture ◽  
Serious Game ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Flexion Extension

Abstract Purpose To determine the validity of wrist range of motion (ROM) measurements by the wearable-controlled ReValidate! wrist-rehabilitation game, which simultaneously acts as a digital goniometer. Furthermore, to establish the reliability of the game by contrasting ROM measurements to those found by medical experts using a universal goniometer. Methods As the universal goniometer is considered the reference standard, inter-rater reliability between surgeons was first determined. Internal validity of the game ROM measurements was determined in a test–retest setting with healthy volunteers. The reliability of the game was tested in 34 patients with a restricted range of motion, in whom the ROM was measured by experts as well as digitally. Intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) were determined and outcomes were analyzed using Bland–Altman plots. Results Inter-rater reliability between experts using a universal goniometer was poor, with ICCs of 0.002, 0.160 and 0.520. Internal validity testing of the game found ICCs of − 0.693, 0.376 and 0.863, thus ranging from poor to good. Reliability testing of the game compared to medical expert measurements, found that mean differences were small for the flexion–extension arc and the radial deviation-ulnar deviation arc. Conclusion The ReValidate! game is a reliable home-monitoring device digitally measuring ROM in the wrist. Interestingly, the test–retest reliability of the serious game was found to be considerably higher than the inter-rater reliability of the reference standard, being healthcare professionals using a universal goniometer. Trial registration number (internal hospital registration only) MEC-AMC W17_003 #17.015.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document