Single-photon quantum error rejection and correction with linear optics

2005 ◽  
Vol 343 (5) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demetrios Kalamidas
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Cao ◽  
Yu-Hong Han ◽  
Xin Yi ◽  
Pan-Pan Yin ◽  
Xiu-Yu Zhang ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic W. Berry ◽  
Stefan Scheel ◽  
Casey R. Myers ◽  
Barry C. Sanders ◽  
Peter L. Knight ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 627-634
Author(s):  
G.-P. Guo ◽  
G.-C. Guo

Here we present an experimentally feasible scheme to entangle flying qubit (individual photon with polarization modes) and stationary qubit (atomic ensembles with long-lived collective excitations). This entanglement integrating two different species can act as a critical element for the coherent transfer of quantum information between flying and stationary qubits. The entanglement degree can be also adjusted expediently with linear optics. Furthermore, the present scheme can be modified to generate this entanglement in a way event-ready, with the employment of a pair of entangled photons. And then successful preparation can be unambiguously heralded by coincident between two single-photon detectors. Its application for individual photons quantum memory is also analyzed. The physical requirements of all those preparation and applications processing are moderate, and well fit the present technique.


2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (Special) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
G.J. Milburn ◽  
T. Ralph ◽  
A. White ◽  
E. Knill ◽  
R. Laflamme

Two qubit gates for photons are generally thought to require exotic materials with huge optical nonlinearities. We show here that, if we accept two qubit gates that only work conditionally, single photon sources, passive linear optics and particle detectors are sufficient for implementing reliable quantum algorithms. The conditional nature of the gates requires feed-forward from the detectors to the optical elements. Without feed forward, non-deterministic quantum computation is possible. We discuss one proposed single photon source based on the surface acoustic wave guiding of single electrons.


Author(s):  
Todd A. Brun

Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information—that is, quantum states—from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Most work on quantum error correction has focused on systems of quantum bits, or qubits, which are two-level quantum systems. These can be physically realized by the states of a spin-1/2 particle, the polarization of a single photon, two distinguished levels of a trapped atom or ion, the current states of a microscopic superconducting loop, or many other physical systems. The most widely used codes are the stabilizer codes, which are closely related to classical linear codes. The code space is the joint +1 eigenspace of a set of commuting Pauli operators on n qubits, called stabilizer generators; the error syndrome is determined by measuring these operators, which allows errors to be diagnosed and corrected. A stabilizer code is characterized by three parameters [[n,k,d]], where n is the number of physical qubits, k is the number of encoded logical qubits, and d is the minimum distance of the code (the smallest number of simultaneous qubit errors that can transform one valid codeword into another). Every useful code has n>k; this physical redundancy is necessary to detect and correct errors without disturbing the logical state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design. Other approaches to error mitigation in quantum systems include decoherence-free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and dynamical decoupling.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inah Yeo ◽  
Doukyun Kim ◽  
Il Ki Han ◽  
Jin Dong Song

AbstractHerein, we present the calculated strain-induced control of single GaAs/AlGaAs quantum dots (QDs) integrated into semiconductor micropillar cavities. We show precise energy control of individual single GaAs QD excitons under multi-modal stress fields of tailored micropillar optomechanical resonators. Further, using a three-dimensional envelope-function model, we evaluated the quantum mechanical correction in the QD band structures depending on their geometrical shape asymmetries and, more interestingly, on the practical degree of Al interdiffusion. Our theoretical calculations provide the practical quantum error margins, obtained by evaluating Al-interdiffused QDs that were engineered through a front-edge droplet epitaxy technique, for tuning engineered QD single-photon sources, facilitating a scalable on-chip integration of QD entangled photons.


2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Walker ◽  
Samuel L. Braunstein

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Javadi ◽  
I. Söllner ◽  
M. Arcari ◽  
S. Lindskov Hansen ◽  
L. Midolo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document