Quantum Error Correction

Author(s):  
Todd A. Brun

Quantum error correction is a set of methods to protect quantum information—that is, quantum states—from unwanted environmental interactions (decoherence) and other forms of noise. The information is stored in a quantum error-correcting code, which is a subspace in a larger Hilbert space. This code is designed so that the most common errors move the state into an error space orthogonal to the original code space while preserving the information in the state. It is possible to determine whether an error has occurred by a suitable measurement and to apply a unitary correction that returns the state to the code space without measuring (and hence disturbing) the protected state itself. In general, codewords of a quantum code are entangled states. No code that stores information can protect against all possible errors; instead, codes are designed to correct a specific error set, which should be chosen to match the most likely types of noise. An error set is represented by a set of operators that can multiply the codeword state. Most work on quantum error correction has focused on systems of quantum bits, or qubits, which are two-level quantum systems. These can be physically realized by the states of a spin-1/2 particle, the polarization of a single photon, two distinguished levels of a trapped atom or ion, the current states of a microscopic superconducting loop, or many other physical systems. The most widely used codes are the stabilizer codes, which are closely related to classical linear codes. The code space is the joint +1 eigenspace of a set of commuting Pauli operators on n qubits, called stabilizer generators; the error syndrome is determined by measuring these operators, which allows errors to be diagnosed and corrected. A stabilizer code is characterized by three parameters [[n,k,d]], where n is the number of physical qubits, k is the number of encoded logical qubits, and d is the minimum distance of the code (the smallest number of simultaneous qubit errors that can transform one valid codeword into another). Every useful code has n>k; this physical redundancy is necessary to detect and correct errors without disturbing the logical state. Quantum error correction is used to protect information in quantum communication (where quantum states pass through noisy channels) and quantum computation (where quantum states are transformed through a sequence of imperfect computational steps in the presence of environmental decoherence to solve a computational problem). In quantum computation, error correction is just one component of fault-tolerant design. Other approaches to error mitigation in quantum systems include decoherence-free subspaces, noiseless subsystems, and dynamical decoupling.

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant Elliot

Abstract: It was shown by [2] how bulk operators in the AdS/CFT correspondence can be represented on the boundary analogously to the way logical qubits are represented in an encoded subspace in quantum error correction. Then in [1]  holographic tensor networks that serve as toy models of the bulk boundary. This paper reviews some of the developments of [1] and [2]. Then it is demonstrated explicitly how to construct perfect tensors, which are essential to the tensor networks mentioned in [2]. Lastly a new example of a holographic quantum error-correcting code based on an eight index perfect tensor is presented.


Author(s):  
Dongsheng Wang ◽  
Yunjiang Wang ◽  
Ningping Cao ◽  
Bei Zeng ◽  
Raymond Lafflamme

Abstract In this work, we develop the theory of quasi-exact fault-tolerant quantum (QEQ) computation, which uses qubits encoded into quasi-exact quantum error-correction codes (``quasi codes''). By definition, a quasi code is a parametric approximate code that can become exact by tuning its parameters. The model of QEQ computation lies in between the two well-known ones: the usual noisy quantum computation without error correction and the usual fault-tolerant quantum computation, but closer to the later. Many notions of exact quantum codes need to be adjusted for the quasi setting. Here we develop quasi error-correction theory using quantum instrument, the notions of quasi universality, quasi code distances, and quasi thresholds, etc. We find a wide class of quasi codes which are called valence-bond-solid codes, and we use them as concrete examples to demonstrate QEQ computation.


Author(s):  
Valentin Kasper ◽  
Daniel González-Cuadra ◽  
Apoorva Hegde ◽  
Andy Xia ◽  
Alexandre Dauphin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (05) ◽  
pp. 1950044
Author(s):  
A. El Allati ◽  
H. Amellal ◽  
A. Meslouhi

A quantum error-correcting code is established in entangled coherent states (CSs) with Markovian and non-Markovian environments. However, the dynamic behavior of these optical states is discussed in terms of quantum correlation measurements, entanglement and discord. By using the correcting codes, these correlations can be as robust as possible against environmental effects. As the number of redundant CSs increases due to the repetitive error correction, the probabilities of success also increase significantly. Based on different optical field parameters, the discord can withstand more than an entanglement. Furthermore, the behavior of quantum discord under decoherence may exhibit sudden death and sudden birth phenomena as functions of dimensionless parameters.


2008 ◽  
Vol 06 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 575-580
Author(s):  
T. ARIMITSU ◽  
T. HAYASHI ◽  
S. KITAJIMA ◽  
F. SHIBATA

It is shown that errors due to spatially correlated noises can be corrected by the quantum error-correction code and error-correction procedure prepared for those for independent noises. A model of noisy-channel which is under the influence of spatially correlated quantum Brownian motion is investigated within the framework of non-equilibrium thermo field dynamics that is a canonical operator formalism for dissipative quantum systems.


2008 ◽  
Vol 06 (supp01) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
CÉDRIC BÉNY ◽  
DAVID W. KRIBS ◽  
ARON PASIEKA

We give a brief introduction to the algebraic formulation of error correction in quantum computing called operator algebra quantum error correction (OAQEC). Then we extend one of the basic results for subsystem codes in operator quantum error correction (OQEC) to the OAQEC setting: Every hybrid classical-quantum code is shown to be unitarily recoverable in an appropriate sense. The algebraic approach of the proof yields a new, less technical proof for the OQEC case.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Gong ◽  
Xiao Yuan ◽  
Shiyu Wang ◽  
Yulin Wu ◽  
Youwei Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Quantum error correction is an essential ingredient for universal quantum computing. Despite tremendous experimental efforts in the study of quantum error correction, to date, there has been no demonstration in the realisation of universal quantum error correcting code, with the subsequent verification of all key features including the identification of an arbitrary physical error, the capability for transversal manipulation of the logical state, and state decoding. To address this challenge, we experimentally realise the [[5, 1, 3]] code, the so-called smallest perfect code that permits corrections of generic single-qubit errors. In the experiment, having optimised the encoding circuit, we employ an array of superconducting qubits to realise the [[5, 1, 3]] code for several typical logical states including the magic state, an indispensable resource for realising non-Clifford gates. The encoded states are prepared with an average fidelity of $57.1(3)\%$ while with a high fidelity of $98.6(1)\%$ in the code space. Then, the arbitrary single-qubit errors introduced manually are identified by measuring the stabilizers. We further implement logical Pauli operations with a fidelity of $97.2(2)\%$ within the code space. Finally, we realise the decoding circuit and recover the input state with an overall fidelity of $74.5(6)\%$, in total with 92 gates. Our work demonstrates each key aspect of the [[5, 1, 3]] code and verifies the viability of experimental realization of quantum error correcting codes with superconducting qubits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document