Multiple gene co-integration in Arabidopsis thaliana predominantly occurs in the same genetic locus after simultaneous in planta transformation with distinct Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains

Plant Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (6) ◽  
pp. 1515-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volodymyr V. Radchuk ◽  
Dang Thi Van ◽  
Evelyn Klocke
2006 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Supartana ◽  
Tsutomu Shimizu ◽  
Masahiro Nogawa ◽  
Hidenari Shioiri ◽  
Tadashi Nakajima ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ni Putu Ayu Erninda Oktaviani Suputri ◽  
Rindang Dwiyani ◽  
Ida Ayu Putri Darmawanti ◽  
Bambang Sugiharto

The SoSPS1 gene of sugar cane plants previously subjected to Agrobacterium tumefacienmediated cloning was to be transferred to citrus plants to increase metabolism of sucrose in plant. The T-DNA harbored the SoSPS1 gene under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter from the cauliflower mosaic virus and contained the NPTII gene (kanamycin resistance gene) as a selectable marker for transformant selection. Generally, gene transformation in plants is carried out by tissue culture. However, tissue culture has several disadvantages such as its being time-consuming, its sometimes resulting in somatic mutations and somaclonal variations, and the requirement of sterile conditions in the procedure of gene transfer. In planta transformation is a useful system for those plants that lack tissue culture and regeneration system. The main function of in planta transformation is to recover the advantages of tissue culture as an efficient, quick method, including its ability to produce a large number of transgenic plants and to accumulate a high concentration of total soluble protein in short time. There are two procedures of in planta transformation for the seeds of citrus plants, namely “prick and coat” and “seed tip-cutting and imbibition”. In the prick and coat method, seeds are pricked on their entire surfaces and smeared with a suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In the seed tip-cutting and imbibition method, on the other hand, seeds are cut at the tip and soaked in a suspension of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The leaves derived from seeds treatment were taken as samples for DNA extraction and PCR using primers of the NPTII gene (Forward: 5’-GTCATCTCACCTTCCTCCTGCC-3’; Reverse: 5’-GTCGCTTGGTCGGTCATTTCG-3’). This research found that only the seed tip-cutting and imbibition plants amplified along the 550-bp band, while those of the prick and coat method did not. Additionally, the T-DNA was successfully integrated into the genome of the plants treated with the seed tip-cutting and imbibition method but not with the prick and coat.


2017 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 174-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-yan Zhang ◽  
Dong-min Zhang ◽  
Yun Zhong ◽  
Xiao-jun Chang ◽  
Min-lun Hu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
I Putu Wahyu Sanjaya ◽  
Rindang Dwiyani ◽  
I Gede Putu Wirawan ◽  
Bambang Sugiharto

One of the modern plant breedings through genetic engineering is Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation can be performed in vitro or in planta. In planta transformation arises from the weaknesses of the in vitro method such as need high hygiene standard, professional tissue culture experts, and more time to prepare explants and somaclonal variation. In planta transformation is a method to transfer the gene to the plant genome without any tissue culture stages. The aims of this research were to know the possibility of the prick and soak in planta method with the target of tomato seeds and to know the most suitable inoculation time for tomato seeds transformation by prick and soak method the transformation is done by pricking the seeds and soaking them in the A. tumefaciens suspension. The treatments in this study were 1 and 2 days inoculation time to test the efficacy of prick and soak in planta transformation method. Tomato seeds were pricked with a needle on the center once, and then soaked in A. tumefaciens strain LB4404 suspension carrying pKYS-SoSPS1 plasmid with Neomycin Phosphotransferase (NPTII) and Saccharum officinarum Sucrose Phosphate synthase (SoSPS1) genes. Visualization of tomato’s DNA samples after PCR showed that 1-day inoculation sample was positively integrated with NPTII gene and negative in the 2 days inoculation treatment.


1994 ◽  
Vol 245 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Katavic ◽  
George W. Haughn ◽  
Darwin Reed ◽  
Marilyn Martin ◽  
Ljerka Kunst

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. P. Eswara Reddyl ◽  
M. Anuradha ◽  
Marc Vauterin ◽  
M. Jacobs ◽  
David J. Oliver

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1875-1887
Author(s):  
Nicole Bechtold ◽  
Bénédicte Jaudeau ◽  
Sylvie Jolivet ◽  
Bruno Maba ◽  
Daniel Vezon ◽  
...  

Abstract In planta transformation methods are now commonly used to transform Arabidopsis thaliana by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The origin of transformants obtained by these methods has been studied by inoculating different floral stages and examining gametophytic expression of an introduced β-glucuronidase marker gene encoding GUS. We observed that transformation can still occur after treating flowers where embryo sacs have reached the stage of the third division. No GUS expression was observed in embryo sacs or pollen of plants infiltrated with an Agrobacterium strain bearing a GUS gene under the control of a gametophyte-specific promoter. To identify the genetic target we used an insertion mutant in which a gene essential for male gametophytic development has been disrupted by a T-DNA bearing a Basta resistance gene (BR). In this mutant the BR marker is transferred to the progeny only by the female gametes. This mutant was retransformed with a hygromycin resistance marker and doubly resistant plants were selected. The study of 193 progeny of these transformants revealed 25 plants in which the two resistance markers were linked in coupling and only one plant where they were linked in repulsion. These results point to the chromosome set of the female gametophyte as the main target for the T-DNA.


2005 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Supartana ◽  
Tsutomu Shimizu ◽  
Hidenari Shioiri ◽  
Masahiro Nogawa ◽  
Masayuki Nozue ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document