Cognitive Dissonance and Pediatric Procedural Pain Management: A Concept Clarification

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
April A. Bice
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Cognitive Dissonance ◽  
Procedural Pain

scholarly journals Using of Distraction Methods on Procedural Pain Management of Pediatric Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
Sevil İnal ◽  
Nejla Canbulat
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Procedural Pain

scholarly journals Pain and anxiety experiences of South African adult burn injury patients during physiotherapy management

2010 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.D. Morris ◽  
Q.A. Louw
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
South African ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Current Situation ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Short Report ◽  
Burn Unit ◽  
Effective Adjunct

A dequate management of procedural pain during physiotherapy management plays an important role in building a trusting relationship betweenthe burn victim and the physiotherapist, and in ensuring desirable functional outcomes. However, the burn pain management regimens currently utilized inburn units, primarily consist of traditional pharmacologic analgesics which areassociated with numerous side-effects and alone are often reported as inadequateto alleviate procedural pain, warranting safer and effective adjunct therapies.Prior to the introduction and implementation of adjunct therapies into a developing world, it is imperative that the current situation in a burn unit, in terms of whether or not the pain management regimens in place are adequate, is first assessed, due to cost concerns. The following short report exemplifies the pain and anxiety experiences of a small number of burn injury patients during physiotherapy at the Tygerberg Hospital adult burn unit, South A frica.  It was hypothesized that the results of this study would underpin whether adult burn injury patients in a developing countryrequire adjunct therapies during physiotherapy management to supplement traditional pharmacologic analgesics inmanaging their procedural pain and subsequent anxiety.

scholarly journals Massage therapy for paediatric procedural pain: A rapid review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie Bernstein ◽  
Mohammad Karkhaneh ◽  
Liliane Zorzela ◽  
Hsing Jou ◽  
Sunita Vohra
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Complementary Therapies ◽  
Massage Therapy ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scales

Abstract Background Pain is a common paediatric problem, and procedural pain, in particular, can be difficult to manage. Complementary therapies are often sought for pain management, including massage therapy (MT). We assessed the evidence for use of MT for acute procedural pain management in children. Methods We searched five main databases for (i) primary studies in English, (ii) included children 0 to 18 years of age, (iii) compared MT for procedural pain management to standard care alone or placebo, and (iv) measured pain as the primary or secondary outcome. The data were extracted by one author and verified by a second author. Randomized controlled trials were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results Eleven paediatric trials of procedural pain in neonatal, burn, and oncology populations, a total of 771 participants, were identified. Eight reported statistically significant reductions in pain after MT compared to standard care. Pain was measured using validated pain scales, or physiologic indicators. The studies were heterogeneous in population, techniques, and outcome measures used. No adverse events associated with MT were identified. Conclusion MT may be an effective nonpharmacologic adjunct for management of procedural pain in children.

Health aspects among personnel working with nitrous oxide for procedural pain management in children

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ekbom ◽  
N. Lindman ◽  
C. Marcus ◽  
R. E. Anderson ◽  
J. G. Jakobsson
Keyword(s):  
Nitrous Oxide ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Procedural Pain

scholarly journals A Review of Systematic Reviews on Pain Interventions in Hospitalized Infants

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Yamada ◽  
Jennifer Stinson ◽  
Jasmine Lamba ◽  
Alison Dickson ◽  
Patrick J McGrath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block ◽  
Nutritive Sucking ◽  
Dorsal Penile Nerve ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Quality Evidence

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized infants undergo multiple, repeated painful procedures. Despite continued efforts to prevent procedural pain and improve pain management, clinical guidelines and standards frequently do not reflect the highest quality evidence from systematic reviews.OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise all systematic reviews on the effectiveness of procedural pain interventions in hospitalized infants.METHODS: A structured review was conducted on published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions of acute procedural pain in hospitalized infants. Searches were completed in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Two reviewers independently selected articles for review and rated the methodological quality of the included reviews using a validated seven-point quality assessment measure. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.RESULTS: Of 1469 potential systematic reviews on interventions for painful procedures in hospitalized infants, 11 high-quality reviews were included in the analysis. Pharmacological interventions supported by research evidence included premedication for intubation, dorsal penile nerve block and EMLA (AstraZeneca Canada, Inc) for circumcision, and sucrose for single painful procedures. Non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, holding, touching, positioning, facilitative tucking, breast feeding and supplemental breast milk were nonpharmacological interventions supported for procedural pain.CONCLUSION: There is a growing number of high-quality reviews supporting procedural pain management in infants. Ongoing research of single, repeated and combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions is required to provide the highest quality evidence to clinicians for decision-making on optimal pain management.

Procedural Pain Management with Non-Pharmacological Interventions

Neonatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
pp. 206-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celeste Johnston ◽  
Ananda M. Fernandes ◽  
Marsha Campbell-Yeo
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document