Poster 414 The Impact of an Acute Care Hospital's Active Surveillance Program for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on Clinical Infections With MRSA in an Associated Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility

PM&R ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. S318-S318
Author(s):  
Aimee Widner ◽  
Clinton E. Faulk ◽  
Delores L. Nobles ◽  
Keith M. Ramsey ◽  
Paul Vos
Cardiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 85-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Muñoz ◽  
Lourdes Vicent ◽  
Emilio Bouza ◽  
Iago Sousa-Casasnovas ◽  
Paula López-Roa ◽  
...  

Objectives: Our goal was to determine the presentation and prognosis of influenza in an intensive cardiac care unit and to analyze the impact of an active surveillance program in the diagnosis. Methods: We performed a prospective registry during the flu season in a coronary unit. In the first phase, no systematic screening was performed. Systematic influenza A and B detection was performed in a second phase for all patients admitted. Results: From 227 patients, we identified 17 (7.5%) with influenza. Influenza patients were more likely to have a non-ischemic cause of admission (14 patients [82.4%] vs. 48 patients [40.3%], p = 0.002), fever (8 patients [47.1%] vs. 3 patients [2.6%], p < 0.001), and respiratory failure (7 patients [41.2%] vs. 8 patients [7%], p = 0.001). Influenza infection was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 12.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9–13.6, p < 0.001). The incidence of influenza was 6.6% (6 patients) when no active screening was performed and 7.9% (11 patients) when systematic detection was performed (p = 0.005). The time to diagnosis was shorter in the systematic screening phase (0.92 ± 1.6 vs. 5.2 ± 3.8 days, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Influenza affects approximately 8% of patients admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit during the flu season, with a high mortality rate. An active surveillance program improves early detection.


2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 781-784
Author(s):  
Marisel Segarra-Newnham ◽  
Kristin St. John

Background To identify patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), an active surveillance culture (ASC) protocol has been in place since March 2007. Decolonization with mupirocin ointment is not recommended but may be attempted after a positive MRSA screen. Objective Assess the impact of an inpatient ASC protocol on prescribing of mupirocin nasal ointment for decolonization before and after protocol implementation. Methods A retrospective review of mupirocin inpatient prescribing and outpatient clinic requests from March 2006 through February 2007 (1 year before ASC implementation) and from March 2007 through February 2008 (1 year after ASC implementation) was conducted. Cultures for MRSA after decolonization were evaluated. Results During the 24 months reviewed, 38 inpatients received mupirocin (18 before and 20 after ASC). Only 14 patients (37%) had a follow-up nasal swab (5 before and 9 after ASC). Of these patients, 5 (36%) had a positive nasal swab after the initial decolonization attempt. Ten patients (26%) had at least 1 clinical culture positive for MRSA after the initial decolonization (7 before and 3 after ASC). Outpatient requests for mupirocin increased 2.5-fold after ASC implementation. Sixty percent of the requests were not appropriate. Conclusion After implementation of the ASC protocol, there was no change in mupirocin prescribing for decolonization in the inpatient setting. However, outpatient requests—most of which were not indicated—increased. Success of decolonization cannot be assessed because follow-up nasal screening was not universally performed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document