Hydrodynamic characteristics of a pilot-scale cold model of a CO2 capture fluidised bed reactor

2013 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 1060-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cotton ◽  
K. Patchigolla ◽  
J.E. Oakey
2009 ◽  
Vol 154 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 375-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Di Felice ◽  
Claire Courson ◽  
Nader Jand ◽  
Katia Gallucci ◽  
Pier Ugo Foscolo ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 285-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Maree ◽  
P. du Plessis

Traditionally, lime is used for the neutralization of acidic effluents. Calcium carbonate should be considered as an alternative because of considerations such as lower cost, low solubility at pH values greater than 7 and simple dosing system required. The paper describes a pilot scale study to determine the technical feasibility of neutralising sulphuric acid-rich water using fluidised bed technology. Limestone was utilised completely when testing iron(III)-rich water, but with iron(II)-rich water, coated limestone particles accumulated in the fluidised-bed reactor. About 70% of the limestone was utilised in the case of water containing 600 mg/l iron(II). A contact time of 4 min was sufficient for the neutralization of acid water containing 4 g/l free acid and 580 mg/l iron(III), compared to 40 min when iron(II) replaced iron(III).


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (19) ◽  
pp. 14195-14204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui An ◽  
Tao Song ◽  
Laihong Shen ◽  
Changlei Qin ◽  
Junjun Yin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 2219-2225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raja Razuan ◽  
Qun Chen ◽  
Karen N. Finney ◽  
Nigel V. Russell ◽  
Vida N. Sharifi ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beno�t Dubuis ◽  
Oemer M. Kut ◽  
Jiri E. Prenosil

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Al-Mamun ◽  
Azni Idris

A pilot scale anaerobic fluidised bed reactor (AnFBR) of 2000 L capacity was studied to determine its performance to treat palm oil mill effluent (POME). The pilot plant was operated at ambient temperature with diluted POME as substrate. It took 17 days for the start-up of the reactor with pre-seeded sand media. The AnFBR was capable to remove a large portion of organics at relatively shorter retention time. Maximum and minimum COD removal efficiency of 85% and 65% were attained at a loading rate of 4.0 and 13.8 kgCOD/m3.d. BOD and TSS removal rates varied within the range of 64% - 91% and 68% - 89%, respectively. The AnFBR exhibited low sludge production with lower sludge volume indices (SVI). Maximum and minimum effluent indices for the effluent were 35 mL/g and 11 mL/g, respectively. Low SVI values indicated that, anaerobic fluidised bed reactors generate less sludge with fast settling properties. Promising performance at ambient temperature and for detention time shorter than the present practices supported the possibility of AnFBR to treat POME to meet the new requirement set by the DOE Malaysia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter T. Clough ◽  
Gianluca Greco ◽  
Maria Erans ◽  
Antonio Coppola ◽  
Fabio Montagnaro ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Schöny ◽  
Johannes Fuchs ◽  
Melina Infantino ◽  
Sander Van Paasen ◽  
Jolinde van de Graaf ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Maree ◽  
G. J. van Tonder ◽  
P. Millard ◽  
T. C. Erasmus

Traditionally acid mine water is neutralised with lime (Ca(OH)2). Limestone (CaCO3) is a cheaper alternative for such applications. This paper describes an investigation aimed at demonstrating that underground mine water can be neutralised with limestone in a fluidised-bed. The contact time required between the limestone and the acid water, chemical composition of water before and after treatment, and economic feasibility of the fluidised bed neutralisation process are determined. A pilot plant with a capacity of 10k1/h was operated continuously underground in a gold mine. The underground water could be neutralised effectively using the limestone process. The pH of the water was increased from less than 3 to more than 7, the alkalinity of the treated water was greater than 120 mg/l (as CaCO3) and the contact time required between mine water and limestone was less than 10 min (the exact contact time depends on the limestone surface area). Chemical savings of 56.4% can be achieved compared to neutralisation with lime.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document