Geochemical constraints on the origin and evolution of the volcanic Rooiberg Group, Bushveld Large Igneous Province, South Africa

2022 ◽  
Vol 369 ◽  
pp. 106509
Author(s):  
Teimoor Nazari-Dehkordi ◽  
Laurence Robb
2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-668
Author(s):  
N. Lenhardt ◽  
W. Altermann ◽  
F. Humbert ◽  
M. de Kock

Abstract The Palaeoproterozoic Hekpoort Formation of the Pretoria Group is a lava-dominated unit that has a basin-wide extent throughout the Transvaal sub-basin of South Africa. Additional correlative units may be present in the Kanye sub-basin of Botswana. The key characteristic of the formation is its general geochemical uniformity. Volcaniclastic and other sedimentary rocks are relatively rare throughout the succession but may be dominant in some locations. Hekpoort Formation outcrops are sporadic throughout the basin and mostly occur in the form of gentle hills and valleys, mainly encircling Archaean domes and the Palaeoproterozoic Bushveld Complex (BC). The unit is exposed in the western Pretoria Group basin, sitting unconformably either on the Timeball Hill Formation or Boshoek Formation, which is lenticular there, and on top of the Boshoek Formation in the east of the basin. The unit is unconformably overlain by the Dwaalheuwel Formation. The type-locality for the Hekpoort Formation is the Hekpoort farm (504 IQ Hekpoort), ca. 60 km to the west-southwest of Pretoria. However, no stratotype has ever been proposed. A lectostratotype, i.e., the Mooikloof area in Pretoria East, that can be enhanced by two reference stratotypes are proposed herein. The Hekpoort Formation was deposited in a cratonic subaerial setting, forming a large igneous province (LIP) in which short-termed localised ponds and small braided river systems existed. It therefore forms one of the major Palaeoproterozoic magmatic events on the Kaapvaal Craton.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Kotze ◽  
R. James Roberts

<p>AD Kotze and RJ Roberts</p><p>Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, South Africa; [email protected]</p><p>The Karoo Large Igneous Province (KLIP) in South Africa consists of both a spatially limited extrusive basalt suite (Drakensberg Group) and a spatially extensive dolerite suite, both generally considered to be remarkable homogenous and of a “low-Ti” character (Luttinen, 2018). The homogeneity of the rocks requires that statistical analysis is necessary to look for spatial and geochemical trends in the data, which may yield clues to the mantle processes producing the 60 000 km<sup>2</sup> expanse of basaltic magma. In this project, data derived from several locations are used as proxies to check for lateral variability in the Karoo dolerites. A principal component analysis (PCA) on trace element data using a covariance matrix was performed, and comparisons based on variables that are 1) common to the Karoo dolerites and Lesotho basalts and, 2) responsible for the most amount of variation to the data set are made. Trace element modelling is then used to test different mantle melting scenarios possibly responsible for the variation seen in the dolerites.</p><p>Principal component analyses revealed several trace elements are responsible for most of the variability in the dolerites. Cr and Ni has the strongest positive loading on Component 1 whereas Cr and Ba has the strongest positive loading on Component 2. Ba has a strong negative loading on Component 1. Cu, Sr, V and Zr do impart an appreciable amount of variation to the data, but all four variables have weak negative loadings on both components. Interestingly, the activity of Cu and V seems to be the inverse of that of Cr and Ni.</p><p>Due to the nature of a PCA, this work is afforded an opportunity to place the geochemistry of the Karoo dolerites within a larger geodynamic context without bias. From the observed variation, the activity of Ba and Cr is interpreted as an assimilation-oxidation process, whereas the Ni signature reflects the mantle origin of the magmas. Further modelling of these processes will allow the testing of suggested mechanisms for the formation of the KLIP, especially whether the magmatism is plume-related or related to the foundering of crustal blocks.</p><p>Luttinen, A., 2018. Bilateral geochemical asymmetry in the Karoo large igneous province. Scientific Reports, 8(5223).</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 959-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Else-Ragnhild Neumann ◽  
Henrik Svensen ◽  
Christophe Y. Galerne ◽  
Sverre Planke

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 ◽  
pp. 291-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumi Chattopadhaya ◽  
Biswajit Ghosh ◽  
Tomoaki Morishita ◽  
Sandip Nandy ◽  
Akihiro Tamura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document