scholarly journals Random Sequential Simulation of the Resulting Surface Roughness in Plasma Electrolytic Polishing of Stainless Steel

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 981-986
Author(s):  
Igor Danilov ◽  
Raphael Paul ◽  
Matthias Hackert-Oschätzchen ◽  
Mike Zinecker ◽  
Susanne Quitzke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Sequential Simulation ◽  
Electrolytic Polishing ◽  
Plasma Electrolytic

Surface Modification of Steel by Anodic Plasma Electrolytic Boronitriding and Polishing

2019 ◽  
Vol 972 ◽  
pp. 229-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei A. Kusmanov ◽  
Vasiliy Belkin ◽  
Irina Kusmanova
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Low Carbon Steel ◽  
Corrosion Current ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Corrosion Properties ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Diffusion Layers ◽  
Electrolytic Polishing ◽  
Plasma Electrolytic ◽  
Positive Results

The paper shows the possibility of plasma electrolytic polishing of the steel surface after its chemical-thermal treatment. Positive results of the plasma electrolytic polishing are obtained for low carbon steel after its anodic plasma electrolytic boronitriding. An X-ray diffractometer and a scanning electron microscopy were used to characterize the phase composition of the modified layer and its surface morphology. Surface roughness was studied with the use of a roughness tester. The hardness of the treated and untreated samples was measured using a microhardness tester. Corrosion properties of the samples treated surfaces were evaluated using potentiodynamic polarisation tests in solution of sodium chloride. The reduction of the surface roughness of 1.7 times and the corrosion current density of 1.5 times of boronitrided steel by plasma polishing using mode of current interruption for 2 min without changing the structure of the diffusion layers is shows.

Influence of Plasma Electrolytic Polishing on Surface Roughness of Steel, Aluminum and Cemented Carbide

2021 ◽  
pp. 265-273
Author(s):  
I. Danilov ◽  
S. Quitzke ◽  
A. Martin ◽  
P. Steinert ◽  
M. Zinecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Cemented Carbide ◽  
Electrolytic Polishing ◽  
Plasma Electrolytic

scholarly journals Influence of Plasma Electrolytic Polishing Conditions on Surface Roughness of Steel

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. N. Belkin ◽  
S. A. Silkin ◽  
I. G. D’yakov ◽  
S. V. Burov ◽  
S. A. Kusmanov
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Electrolytic Polishing ◽  
Plasma Electrolytic

Studying The Effect of a New Mixed Cutting Fluid on Surface Roughness

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11A) ◽  
pp. 1593-1601
Author(s):  
Mohammed H. Shaker ◽  
Salah K. Jawad ◽  
Maan A. Tawfiq
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Cutting Parameters ◽  
Machining Process ◽  
Cutting Fluid ◽  
Depth Of Cut ◽  
Cutting Fluids ◽  
Machining Processes ◽  
Dry Cutting ◽  
Cutting Speeds

This research studied the influence of cutting fluids and cutting parameters on the surface roughness for stainless steel worked by turning machine in dry and wet cutting cases. The work was done with different cutting speeds, and feed rates with a fixed depth of cutting. During the machining process, heat was generated and effects of higher surface roughness of work material. In this study, the effects of some cutting fluids, and dry cutting on surface roughness have been examined in turning of AISI316 stainless steel material. Sodium Lauryl Ether Sulfate (SLES) instead of other soluble oils has been used and compared to dry machining processes. Experiments have been performed at four cutting speeds (60, 95, 155, 240) m/min, feed rates (0.065, 0.08, 0.096, 0.114) mm/rev. and constant depth of cut (0.5) mm. The amount of decrease in Ra after the used suggested mixture arrived at (0.21µm), while Ra exceeded (1µm) in case of soluble oils This means the suggested mixture gave the best results of lubricating properties than other cases.

scholarly journals Post-Processing and Surface Characterization of Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel 316L Lattice: Implications for BioMedical Use

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1376
Author(s):  
Alex Quok An Teo ◽  
Lina Yan ◽  
Akshay Chaudhari ◽  
Gavin Kane O’Neill
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Surface Characterization ◽  
High Surface ◽  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Stainless Steel 316L ◽  
Processing Methods ◽  
Particulate Debris

Additive manufacturing of stainless steel is becoming increasingly accessible, allowing for the customisation of structure and surface characteristics; there is little guidance for the post-processing of these metals. We carried out this study to ascertain the effects of various combinations of post-processing methods on the surface of an additively manufactured stainless steel 316L lattice. We also characterized the nature of residual surface particles found after these processes via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Finally, we measured the surface roughness of the post-processing lattices via digital microscopy. The native lattices had a predictably high surface roughness from partially molten particles. Sandblasting effectively removed this but damaged the surface, introducing a peel-off layer, as well as leaving surface residue from the glass beads used. The addition of either abrasive polishing or electropolishing removed the peel-off layer but introduced other surface deficiencies making it more susceptible to corrosion. Finally, when electropolishing was performed after the above processes, there was a significant reduction in residual surface particles. The constitution of the particulate debris as well as the lattice surface roughness following each post-processing method varied, with potential implications for clinical use. The work provides a good base for future development of post-processing methods for additively manufactured stainless steel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document