Ongoing host-shift speciation in Plasmodium simium

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 940-942
Author(s):  
Thaís C. de Oliveira ◽  
Priscila T. Rodrigues ◽  
Ana Maria R.C. Duarte ◽  
Luísa D.P. Rona ◽  
Marcelo U. Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Lucas Rodríguez ◽  
Frank W Stearns ◽  
Robert L Snyder ◽  
Kelley J Tilmon ◽  
Michael S Cast ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 761 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Schiaparelli ◽  
Maria Chiara Alvaro ◽  
Niamh Kilgallen ◽  
Alice Scinto ◽  
Anne-Nina Lörz
Keyword(s):  
Ross Sea ◽  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise A Marston ◽  
Daniel L Horton ◽  
Javier Nunez ◽  
Richard J Ellis ◽  
Richard J Orton ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nigel F. Delaney ◽  
Susan Balenger ◽  
Camille Bonneaud ◽  
Christopher J. Marx ◽  
Geoffrey E. Hill ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne S. Griffin ◽  
Michael Gerth ◽  
Gregory D. D. Hurst

AbstractHeritable symbionts represent important components of host biology, both as antagonistic reproductive parasites and as beneficial protective partners. An important component of heritable microbes’ biology is their ability to establish in new host species, a process equivalent to a host shift for an infectiously transmitted parasite or pathogen. For a host shift to occur, the symbiont must be compatible with the host: it must not cause excess pathology, must have good vertical transmission, and possess a drive phenotype that enables spread. Classically, compatibility has been considered a declining function of genetic distance between novel and ancestral host species. Here we investigate the evolutionary lability of compatibility to heritable microbes by comparing the capacity for a symbiont to establish in two novel host species equally related to the ancestral host. Compatibility of the protective Spiroplasma from D. hydei with D. simulans and D. melanogaster was tested. The Spiroplasma had contrasting compatibility in these two host species. The transinfection showed pathology and low vertical transmission in D. melanogaster but was asymptomatic and transmitted with high efficiency in D. simulans. These results were not affected by the presence/absence of Wolbachia in either of the two species. The pattern of protection was not congruent with that for pathology/transmission, with protection being weaker in the D. simulans, the host in which Spiroplasma was asymptomatic and transmitted well. Further work indicated pathological interactions occurred in D. sechellia and D. yakuba, indicating that D. simulans was unusual in being able to carry the symbiont without damage. The differing compatibility of the symbiont with these closely related host species emphasises first the rapidity with which host-symbiont compatibility evolves despite compatibility itself not being subject to direct selection, and second the independence of the different components of compatibility (pathology, transmission, protection). This requirement to fit three different independently evolving aspects of compatibility, if commonly observed, is likely to be a major feature limiting the rate of host shifts. Moving forward, the variation between sibling species pairs observed above provides an opportunity to identify the mechanisms behind variable compatibility between closely related host species, which will drive hypotheses as to the evolutionary drivers of compatibility variation.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1975
Author(s):  
Petra Drzewnioková ◽  
Francesca Festa ◽  
Valentina Panzarin ◽  
Davide Lelli ◽  
Ana Moreno ◽  
...  

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are widespread and highly diversified in wildlife and domestic mammals and can emerge as zoonotic or epizootic pathogens and consequently host shift from these reservoirs, highlighting the importance of veterinary surveillance. All genera can be found in mammals, with α and β showing the highest frequency and diversification. The aims of this study were to review the literature for features of CoV surveillance in animals, to test widely used molecular protocols, and to identify the most effective one in terms of spectrum and sensitivity. We combined a literature review with analyses in silico and in vitro using viral strains and archive field samples. We found that most protocols defined as pan-coronavirus are strongly biased towards α- and β-CoVs and show medium-low sensitivity. The best results were observed using our new protocol, showing LoD 100 PFU/mL for SARS-CoV-2, 50 TCID50/mL for CaCoV, 0.39 TCID50/mL for BoCoV, and 9 ± 1 log2 ×10−5 HA for IBV. The protocol successfully confirmed the positivity for a broad range of CoVs in 30/30 field samples. Our study points out that pan-CoV surveillance in mammals could be strongly improved in sensitivity and spectrum and propose the application of a new RT-PCR assay, which is able to detect CoVs from all four genera, with an optimal sensitivity for α-, β-, and γ-.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document