Evaluation of suspended-sediment sources in the Yeongsan River using Cs-137 after major human impacts

2014 ◽  
Vol 344 ◽  
pp. 64-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Shin Lim ◽  
Jin Kwan Kim ◽  
Jong Wook Kim ◽  
Sei Sun Hong
2005 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Whiting ◽  
Gerald Matisoff ◽  
William Fornes ◽  
Frederick M. Soster

Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 379 ◽  
pp. 114638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julián García-Comendador ◽  
Núria Martínez-Carreras ◽  
Josep Fortesa ◽  
Antoni Borràs ◽  
Aleix Calsamiglia ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 522-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian D. Rutherfurd ◽  
Christine Kenyon ◽  
Martin Thoms ◽  
James Grove ◽  
Jodie Turnbull ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 314-316 ◽  
pp. 513-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
J CARTER ◽  
P OWENS ◽  
D WALLING ◽  
G LEEKS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Lane

<p>The Anthropocene is widely described as producing a rupture in the global stratigraphic signature, attributable to human activities. There is no doubt that human activities have introduced new products into the stratigraphic record; and that humans are modifying the geomorphic processes that produce the sediment which then becomes incorporated into that record. The stratigraphic literature is replete with simplistic generalisations of how sediment flux to the continental shelf is changing, such as increasing due to soil erosion or decreasing due to hydropower related sediment flux disconnection. Here we argue that human impacts on geomorphic processes in the Anthropocene are unlikely to be stationary for long enough for them to be seen consistently across the depositional record of many different environments. Illustrating this for a major inner-Alpine drainage basin, the Swiss Rhône, we show that human-driven global climate-change is indeed dramatically altering the geomorphic process regimes of Alpine environments. However, there are three broad reasons why this is unlikely to be seen in the future geological record. First, the geomorphic response that drives increased sediment delivery is transient because of the significant regime changes associated with global climate change impacts. Second, such increases are countered by other human impacts, notably those on sediment flux, which are tending to reduce the connectivity of sediment sources to downstream sediment sinks. Third, human impacts on both sediment sources and connectivity are nonstationary, driven by both exogenous factors (here illustrated by the worldwide economic shock of 2008) and endogenous ones, notably human response to the perceived problems caused by both sediment starvation and sediment over-supply. In geomorphic terms, then, there is a difference between the pervasive nature of Earth system shifts that we see in the pre-Holocene depositional record and the more ephemeral impacts of the Earth system – human coupling associated with the Anthropocene. The extent to which this is the case is likely to vary geographically and temporally as a function of the degree and nature of human impacts on geomorphic processes. Thus, the primary challenge for future prediction will be as much the prediction of the complex and reflexive nature of human response as it will be geomorphic processes themselves.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 543 ◽  
pp. 171-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S. Vale ◽  
I.C. Fuller ◽  
J.N. Procter ◽  
L.R. Basher ◽  
I.E. Smith

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Vale ◽  
Hugh Smith

<p>Sediment fingerprinting quantifies proportional contributions of catchment sediment sources to downstream sediment mixtures and deposits. While the sediment fingerprinting technique is well established it is still challenged by the coarse spatial resolution of sediment source discrimination which hinders understanding of catchment sediment dynamics and limits its usefulness for land management where finer resolution spatial information is required.</p><p>Here, two conventional sediment fingerprinting datasets from New Zealand are used to show how spatial modelling of source loads can improve 1) the usefulness of sediment fingerprinting approaches and 2) visualization of results for end-users by combining source apportionment with terrain information and sediment budget modelling. The two case studies involve unmixing sediment source contributions to 1) overbank deposits within the Oroua River catchment, where six sediment sources (Mountain Range, Mudstone, Hill Subsurface, Hill Surface, Unconsolidated Sandstone, and Channel Bank) across two size fractions (<63 µm and 125–300 µm) were characterized using bulk geochemical and radionuclide tracers and 2) suspended sediment in the Manawatu catchment, where a similar six sources were characterized using bulk geochemical tracers to determine changes in source contributions to hourly suspended sediment samples during a 53hr storm event.</p><p>The proportional source contributions for each case study are applied to modelled sediment loads and spatially distributed using terrain information for rock type, slope and channel network extent to produce specific sediment yield maps for both catchments and spatial visualization of sediment generation during the Manawatu catchment storm event. Integrating sediment fingerprinting results with spatial datasets and modelling can enhance interpretation of source apportionment results and improve the utility of this information for end-users focused on the spatial targeting of erosion sources for mitigation to reduce downstream sediment impacts.   </p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 1965-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlena Brosinsky ◽  
Saskia Foerster ◽  
Karl Segl ◽  
José Andrés López-Tarazón ◽  
Gemma Piqué ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document