Accounting for the marine reservoir effect in radiocarbon calibration

2019 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Q. Alves ◽  
Kita D. Macario ◽  
Fernando P. Urrutia ◽  
Renan P. Cardoso ◽  
Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Radiocarbon ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1161-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad A Hughen ◽  
John R Southon ◽  
Chanda J H Bertrand ◽  
Brian Frantz ◽  
Paula Zermeño

This paper describes the methods used to develop the Cariaco Basin PL07-58PC marine radiocarbon calibration data set. Background measurements are provided for the period when Cariaco samples were run, as well as revisions leading to the most recent version of the floating varve chronology. The floating Cariaco chronology has been anchored to an updated and expanded Preboreal pine tree-ring data set, with better estimates of uncertainty in the wiggle-match. Pending any further changes to the dendrochronology, these results represent the final Cariaco 58PC calibration data set.


Radiocarbon ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 1623-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron W Reimer ◽  
Paula J Reimer

AbstractA regional offset (ΔR) from the marine radiocarbon calibration curve is widely used in calibration software (e.g. CALIB, OxCal) but often is not calculated correctly. While relatively straightforward for known-age samples, such as mollusks from museum collections or annually banded corals, it is more difficult to calculate ΔR and the uncertainty in ΔR for 14C dates on paired marine and terrestrial samples. Previous researchers have often utilized classical intercept methods that do not account for the full calibrated probability distribution function (pdf). Recently, Soulet (2015) provided R code for calculating reservoir ages using the pdfs, but did not address ΔR and the uncertainty in ΔR. We have developed an online application for performing these calculations for known-age, paired marine and terrestrial 14C dates and U-Th dated corals. This article briefly discusses methods that have been used for calculating ΔR and the uncertainty and describes the online program deltar, which is available free of charge.


Antiquity ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 70 (269) ◽  
pp. 515-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Taylor ◽  
C. Vance Haynes ◽  
Minze Stuiver

The events to do with peopling the New World archaeologically represented by ‘Clovis’ and ‘Folsom’ have been — tantalizingly — beyond the range of radiocarbon calibration. Now calibration extends further, one can ask if the aburptness of Clovis, of Folsom, and of the transition between them are realities. A calibrated chronology for those sites where the stratigraphic security is best shows these in truth are rapid human affairs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 246-267
Author(s):  
Petro Pesonen ◽  
Markku Oinonen

The chronology of the eastern Fennoscandian Neolithic is organized with the help of pottery styles, one of which is southwestern Finnish Jäkärlä Ware. In this paper a number of new radiocarbon dates connected with Jäkärlä Ware and other relevant ceramic groups are presented and discussed. The radiocarbon dates of each group are modelled within a Bayesian chronological framework. Also, the potential reservoir effect in charred crust dates is estimated for each date based on stable carbon isotopic ratios of the crust samples and incorporated into models. Jäkärlä Ware appears to be a short-living and quite a isolated group, which had no chronological contacts with Sperrings 1–2 Wares, but with possible coexistence with Middle Neolithic Typical Comb Ware. Jäkärlä Ware is partly simultaneous with eastern Finnish asbestos-tempered Kaunissaari Ware, and forms with it a short chronological horizon in the turn of the Early and Middle Neolithic of eastern Fennoscandia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 477 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Timothy Patterson ◽  
Carley A. Crann ◽  
Jamie A. Cutts ◽  
Colin J. Courtney Mustaphi ◽  
Nawaf A. Nasser ◽  
...  

Antiquity ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 68 (259) ◽  
pp. 252-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. E. Buck ◽  
C. D. Litton ◽  
E. M. Scott

The revised radiocarbon calibration curve, published last year, extends back into the Pleistocene the radiocarbon determinations that can be converted to real calendar years. For determinations of any age, the right judgements and statistical considerations must be followed if the real information held in the determinations is to be found. Here is advice with some worked examples.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document