Target volume shape variation during irradiation of rectal cancer patients in supine position: Comparison with prone position

2009 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper Nijkamp ◽  
Rianne de Jong ◽  
Jan-Jakob Sonke ◽  
Corine van Vliet ◽  
Corrie Marijnen
2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper Nijkamp ◽  
Rianne de Jong ◽  
Jan-Jakob Sonke ◽  
Peter Remeijer ◽  
Corine van Vliet ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S180
Author(s):  
R. de Jong ◽  
J. Nijkamp ◽  
C. van Vliet-Vroegindewij ◽  
C. Marijnen ◽  
J.J. Sonke

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Kubota ◽  
Masahiko Okamoto ◽  
Yang Li ◽  
Shintaro Shiba ◽  
Shohei Okazaki ◽  
...  

We aimed to clarify the accuracy of rigid image registration and deformable image registration (DIR) in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for pancreatic cancer. Six patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with passive irradiation CIRT were enrolled. Three registration patterns were evaluated: treatment planning computed tomography images (TPCT) to CT images acquired in the treatment room (IRCT) in the supine position, TPCT to IRCT in the prone position, and TPCT in the supine position to the prone position. After warping the contours of the original CT images to the destination CT images using deformation matrices from the registration, the warped delineated contours on the destination CT images were compared with the original ones using mean displacement to agreement (MDA). Four contours (clinical target volume (CTV), gross tumor volume (GTV), stomach, duodenum) and four registration algorithms (rigid image registration [RIR], intensity-based DIR [iDIR], contour-based DIR [cDIR], and a hybrid iDIR-cDIR ([hDIR]) were evaluated. The means ± standard deviation of the MDAs of all contours for RIR, iDIR, cDIR, and hDIR were 3.40 ± 3.30, 2.2 1± 2.48, 1.46 ± 1.49, and 1.46 ± 1.37 mm, respectively. There were significant differences between RIR and iDIR, and between RIR/iDIR and cDIR/hDIR. For the pancreatic cancer patient images, cDIR and hDIR had better accuracy than RIR and iDIR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Alipio ◽  

Prone; Radiotherapy; Rectal Cancer; Retrospective; Setup Reproducibility


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (07) ◽  
pp. 1650095
Author(s):  
JUN LI ◽  
XIAO-BIN TANG ◽  
XI-ZHI ZHANG ◽  
LONG-GANG GUI ◽  
YUN GE ◽  
...  

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the dosimetric effect on the target volume, organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissues based on the different choice for four types of mechanical variables, i.e., treatment position, dose calculation algorithm, mulitleaf collimator (MLC) motion mode and X-ray energy; and to investigate the optimum treatment mode applied to post-operative cervical cancer for 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) technique. Methods: The dosimetric difference on the target volume and OARs under the influence of four types of variables were initially compared by changing one variable at a time. Then, based on the above compared results, we compared the dosimetric difference on planning target volume (PTV) and OARs between group A composed of the superior four variables and group B composed of the relatively inferior four variables. The dosimetric parameters included dose distribution of the target volume, OARs and normal tissues, conformal index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MU) and beam-on time ([Formula: see text]. The independent and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis, and the threshold for statistical significance was [Formula: see text]. Results: Compared with the supine position, the maximum dose of PTV ([Formula: see text]), the maximum dose of small intestine ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] of bladder ([Formula: see text] were all lower in prone position. In contrast with the pencil beam convolution (PBC), CI of PTV (CI[Formula: see text]) was larger while HI of PTV (HI[Formula: see text]) was lower, both [Formula: see text] and the maximum dose of rectum ([Formula: see text]) were lower using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA). Moreover, the same results were obtained using sliding window (SW) compared with multiple static segments (MSS). The mean dose of PTV ([Formula: see text] and CI[Formula: see text] was larger while the maximum dose of the spinal cord ([Formula: see text]), [Formula: see text] and the maximum dose of femoral heads were lower with 15 MV X-rays compared with 6 MV X-rays. In comparison with group B comprising the supine position, PBC, MSS and 6 MV X-rays, [Formula: see text] and HI[Formula: see text] decreased 1.4% and 53.4% respectively, CI[Formula: see text] increased 5.8% medially, while [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] all decreased in group A comprising of prone position, AAA, SW and 15 MV X-rays. Conclusion: The treatment mode composed of prone position, AAA algorithm, SW and 15 MV X-rays is chosen for the post-operative cervical cancer of 5F-IMRT technique, which is more capable of meeting the target volume constraints and maximal protection of OARs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. e17-e22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Cranmer-Sargison ◽  
Vijayananda Kundapur ◽  
Eileen Park-Somers ◽  
Joe Andreas ◽  
Haresh Vachhrajani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document