scholarly journals Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: A systematic review of the clinical data and impact of treatment technique

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Murray ◽  
Ann Henry ◽  
Peter Hoskin ◽  
Frank-Andre Siebert ◽  
Jack Venselaar
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Christina Jahreiß ◽  
Wilma D. Heemsbergen ◽  
Bo van Santvoort ◽  
Mischa Hoogeman ◽  
Maarten Dirkx ◽  
...  

PurposeExternal Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) techniques dramatically changed over the years. This may have affected the risk of radiation-induced second primary cancers (SPC), due to increased irradiated low dose volumes and scatter radiation. We investigated whether patterns of SPC after EBRT have changed over the years in prostate cancer (PCa) survivors.Materials and MethodsPCa survivors diagnosed between 1990-2014 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients treated with EBRT were divided in three time periods, representing 2-dimensional Radiotherapy (RT), 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), and the advanced RT (AdvRT) era. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and absolute excess risks (AER) were calculated to estimate relative and excess absolute SPC risks. Sub-hazard ratios (sHRs) were calculated to compare SPC rates between the EBRT and prostatectomy cohort. SPCs were categorized by subsite and anatomic region.ResultsPCa survivors who received EBRT had an increased risk of developing a solid SPC (SIR=1.08; 1.05-1.11), especially in patients aged <70 years (SIR=1.13; 1.09-1.16). Pelvic SPC risks were increased (SIR=1.28; 1.23-1.34), with no obvious differences between the three EBRT eras. Non-pelvic SPC were only significantly increased in the AdvRT era (SIR=1.08; 1.02-1.14), in particular for the 1-5 year follow-up period. Comparing the EBRT cohort to the prostatectomy cohort, again an increased pelvic SPC risk was found for all EBRT periods (sHRs= 1.61, 1.47-1.76). Increased non-pelvic SPC risks were present for all RT eras and highest for the AdvRT period (sHRs=1.17, 1.06-1.29).ConclusionSPC risk in patients with EBRT is increased and remained throughout the different EBRT eras. The risk of developing a SPC outside the pelvic area changed unfavorably in the AdvRT era. Prolonged follow-up is needed to confirm this observation. Whether this is associated with increased irradiated low-dose volumes and scatter, or other changes in clinical EBRT practice, is the subject of further research.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e226151
Author(s):  
Basil Francis Moss ◽  
Amjad M Peracha

An 80-year-old man with history of prostate cancer successfully treated with brachytherapy was initially thought to have Fournier’s gangrene until imaging detected a rectoprostatic fistula. Although this is known to be a rare complication of prostate brachytherapy, in this case the aetiology was a new primary rectal adenocarcinoma. It was not possible to catheterise per urethra owing to the fistula, so he was fitted with suprapubic catheter, and underwent palliative loop colostomy. Brachytherapy carries a low risk of second primary cancers, although two previous cases reported such cancers as radiation induced. This is, to our knowledge, the first case of rectal adenocarcinoma following prostate brachytherapy in the literature.


2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S158
Author(s):  
N.S. Hegemann ◽  
U. Ganswindt ◽  
J. Engel ◽  
C. Belka

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Murray ◽  
Ann Henry ◽  
Peter Hoskin ◽  
Frank-Andre Siebert ◽  
Jack Venselaar

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 210-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Musunuru ◽  
M. Mason ◽  
L. Murray ◽  
B. Al-Qaisieh ◽  
P. Bownes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Henry ◽  
H.B. Musunuru ◽  
M. Mason ◽  
R. Tatarek-Gintowt ◽  
D. Bottomley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 150-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neige Journy ◽  
Imène Mansouri ◽  
Rodrigue S. Allodji ◽  
Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt ◽  
Debiche Ghazi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document