Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?

Author(s):  
M. Caglar ◽  
O. Kupik ◽  
E. Karabulut ◽  
P.F. Høilund-Carlsen
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11122-e11122
Author(s):  
D. Landau ◽  
S. M. Constantino ◽  
S. Maddipatla ◽  
Z. J. Zhang ◽  
M. Hart ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok-Ho Yoon ◽  
Ku Sang Kim ◽  
Seok Yun Kang ◽  
Hee-Sung Song ◽  
Kyung Sook Jo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Rong ◽  
Siyang Wang ◽  
Qiue Ding ◽  
Miao Yun ◽  
Zhousan Zheng ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas B. Koolen ◽  
Erik Vegt ◽  
Emiel J. Th. Rutgers ◽  
Wouter V. Vogel ◽  
Marcel P. M. Stokkel ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Çiray ◽  
G. Åström ◽  
I. Andréasson ◽  
T. Edekling ◽  
J. Hansen ◽  
...  

Purpose: According to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for response of bone metastases to therapy, new lesions indicate progressive disease. We intended to prove that a new sclerotic lesion on conventional radiography may also be a sign of a positive therapeutic response in a previously undetectable lytic metastasis. Material and Methods: In a previous placebo-controlled clinical trial of clodronate (Ostac) therapy, 139 breast cancer patients with bone metastases underwent both conventional radiography and bone scan every 6 months for 2 years with 99mTc before and during clodronate treatment. WHO criteria were applied for therapy response evaluation. Results: In 24 patients, 52 new sclerotic lesions observed during therapy were selected for re-evaluation of conventional radiographs and bone scans. In 8 of the 24 patients, 17 of 52 new sclerotic lesions (33%) had showed positive uptake on previous bone scans. These lesions were possibly misinterpreted as new when applying WHO criteria. Conclusion: For better assessment of new sclerotic lesions during treatment, more sensitive techniques, e.g. bone scan, are needed as a complement to conventional radiography.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Munshi Md Arif Hosen ◽  
Nasrin Begum ◽  
Pervez Ahmed ◽  
Mosharrof Hossain ◽  
Shefaly Khatun ◽  
...  

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor of females, the incidence increases with age. Bone is the most common site to which breast cancer metastasizes. Between 30% to 85% of patients with metastatic breast cancer develop bone metastases during the course of the disease. Bone scan is the most commonly used means of detecting bone metastasis; it visualizes increases in osteoblastic activity and skeletal vascularity. Many radio-pharmaceuticals (radionuclides) have been used in bone scan including technetium-99m bound to methylene diphosphonate (MDP). Published sensitivity and specificity rates of bone scan for diagnosis varies, with sensitivity ranging from 62% to 100% and specificity from 78% to 100%. However, bone scan is generally considered sensitive for detecting bone metastases on whole-body images.The aim of this study was to evaluate the pattern of distribution of skeletal metastases in patients with breast carcinoma by using Tc-99m MDP bone scan. A retrospective study was conducted on 245 consecutive female breast carcinoma patients irrespective of clinical staging, menopausal status and pre-operative / post- mastectomy status, referred for bone scan to Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajshahi from July 2015 to June 2017.  The mean age of the patients was 43.4 ± 13.8 years (mean ± SD) with range from 29 to 66 years. Bone scan was performed by an intravenous bolus injection of 20 mCi Tc99m-MDP. Bone phase images were taken at three hours after injection of the radiotracer. Out of 245 studied patients, 163 patients (66.53%) were negative for skeletal metastasis and 82 patients (33.47%) were positive for skeletal metastasis. Out of 82 patients with positive skeletal metastasis, 68 (82.93%) patients had multiple sites (two or more) and 14 (17.07%) patients had solitary site of bony involvement. Out of 68 patients with multiple sites of skeletal metastasis, highest number was noted in thoraco-lumbar spine (80.89%), followed by ribs including sternum and clavicle (57.35%), pelvic bones (47.06%), upper extremities including scapula (41.18%), lower extremities (33.82%), cervical spine (23.53%) and skull bone (8.82%). Among 14 patients with solitary skeletal metastasis, maximum number was noted in thoraco-lumbar spine (64.29%), followed by cervical spine (14.29%), pelvic bone (07.14%), ribs (07.14%) and sternum (07.14%). Skeletal metastases were  much more common in multiple sites than solitary lesion in breast cancer patients. Thoraco-lumbar spine was the most common site of involvement in both solitary and multiple lesions in our study. Axial skeleton was more commonly involved than the appendicular skeleton. Bone scan may pick up bone metastases up to 18 months earlier than conventional radiology, with an average lead of four months. 99m Tc- MDP bone scan is very cost effective in comparison to other imaging modalities (CT, MRI, and PET) and play a major role in early detection of skeletal metastasis in breast cancer patients. Bangladesh J. Nuclear Med. 21(1): 21-25, January 2018


Author(s):  
Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document