The effect of the physical boundary conditions on the thermal performance of molten salt thermocline tank

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 190-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheshao Chang ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Chao Xu ◽  
Chun Chang ◽  
Zhifeng Wang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Foster Kwame Kholi ◽  
Hariharan Kallath ◽  
Alberto Mucci ◽  
Man Yeong Ha ◽  
Jason Chetwynd-Chatwin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto Jusko ◽  
◽  
Michael Neugebauer ◽  
Helge Reimann ◽  
Ralf Bernhardt ◽  
...  

Form standards with different profile geometries were measured using 3- and 4-axis scanning on a 3D CMM prototype with a precision rotary table. Physical boundary conditions, including probing force, probe diameter, probe geometry, probe material, and scanning speed, were varied, and then the results were analyzed. Some results were found to be equivalent to those obtained using form measuring machines. Limitations of the current implementation of this technique are discussed.


Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. T11-T27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaushik Maji ◽  
Fuchun Gao ◽  
Sameera K. Abeykoon ◽  
Donald J. Kouri

We have developed a method of solving the Helmholtz equation based on a new way to generalize the “one-way” wave equation, impose correct boundary conditions, and eliminate exponentially growing evanescent waves. The full two-way nature of the Helmholtz equation is included, but the equation is converted into a pseudo one-way form in the framework of a generalized phase-shift structure consisting of two coupled first-order partial differential equations for wave propagation with depth. A new algorithm, based on the particular structure of the coupling between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], is introduced to treat this problem by an explicit approach. More precisely, in a depth-marching strategy, the wave operator is decomposed into the sum of two matrices: The first one is a propagator in a reference velocity medium, whereas the second one is a perturbation term which takes into account the vertical and lateral variation of the velocity. The initial conditions are generated by solving the Lippmann-Schwinger integral equation formally, in a noniterative fashion. The approach corresponds essentially to “factoring out” the physical boundary conditions, thereby converting the inhomogeneous Lippmann-Schwinger integral equation of the second kind into a Volterra integral equation of the second kind. This procedure supplies artificial boundary conditions, along with a rigorous method for converting these solutions to those satisfying the correct, Lippmann-Scwinger (physical) boundary conditions. To make the solution numerically stable, the Feshbach projection operator technique is used to remove only the nonphysical exponentially growing evanescent waves, while retaining the exponentially decaying evanescent waves, along with all propagating waves. Suitable absorbing boundary conditions are implemented to deal with reflection or wraparound from boundaries. At the end, the Lippmann-Schwinger solutions are superposed to produce time snapshots of the propagating wave.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document