A novel MagLev-based separation approach for heavy metal recycling

2021 ◽  
Vol 174 ◽  
pp. 105769
Author(s):  
Chengqian ZHANG ◽  
Daofan TANG ◽  
Mingyi CAO ◽  
Fu GU ◽  
Xiangyu CAI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Li ◽  
Xiaohui Ji ◽  
Xuegang Luo

Phytomining has attracted widespread attention as a technique for harvesting “bio-ore.” This technology has potential applications in the metal and minerals industry for low-grade metal and mineral mining as well as metal recycling from polluted soil. The hotspots and future trends of this technology deserve in-depth exploration. This paper presents a systematic review of the phytomining research area through the scientometrics method based on the citation data collected from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The results show that the earliest phytomining-related research was published in 1997. Between 1997 and 2019, 232 publications were published in 109 journals. Plant and Soil, the International Journal of Phytoremediation, and the Journal of Geochemical Exploration were the top three most prolific journals and accounted for 18.1% of these publications. Guillaume Echevarria, J.L. Morel, and Antony Van der Ent were the top three most prolific authors, and their work accounted for 40.1% of these publications. The cluster results of document co-citation analysis revealed that the hotspots in phytomining research area mainly includes “nickel accumulation,” “heavy metal uptake,” “mining site,” “heavy metal,” “hyperaccumulation yield,” “growth effect,” and “alternative method.” Keyword burst detection results find that the hot topics have changed over time from “phytomining” to “agromining”; from “contaminated soil” to “serpentine soil”; and from “mechanism” to “phytomining process” and “commercial phytoextraction.” This study describes the intellectual landscape of research and provides future research directions for phytomining research so that researchers can identify future research topics and partners.


2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 04039
Author(s):  
Yamei Yang ◽  
Hang Zhou ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
Changrui Shi ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
...  

The scarcity of water and increasing water pollution are the pressing challenge human being facing. Recovering water and valuable heavy metals is highly desired for treating heavy metal containing wastewater. We proposed a novel hydrate-based process to treat Ni2+ containing wastewater. The water recovery, Ni2+ enrichment factor, desalination efficiency were studied using this cyclopentane hydrate-based method. A water recovery of 43% can be obtained with a desalination efficiency of round 88% and an enrichment factor of 1.6. The desalination efficiency and the quality of the as-made water via the hydrate-based process can be further improved to above 99% via three-stage hydrate reaction. The proposed hydrate-based water treatment process may find wide applications in waste water treatment and heavy metal recycling.


2014 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Jürgen Antrekowitsch ◽  
Stefan Steinlechner ◽  
Christoph Pichler ◽  
René Rumpold ◽  
Alois Unger ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20thAnniv (0) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Hara ◽  
Satoru Yoshioka ◽  
Tetsuaki Nishida
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Hara ◽  
Satoru Yoshioka ◽  
Tetsuaki Nishida
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1657-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weizhen Liu ◽  
Changzhou Weng ◽  
Jiayi Zheng ◽  
Xiaoqian Peng ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
...  

This article reviews the challenges of nanosludge and provides new insights into the treatment of nanosludge for heavy metal recycling.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Gulyás ◽  
Viktória Pitás ◽  
Bence Fazekas ◽  
Árpád Kárpáti

Abstract Heavy metal removal from a municipal wastewater treatment plant was evaluated in the given study. The aim of the work was to find water or sludge streams in the technology that could be treated separately for heavy metal removal to maximise the efficiency of the entire treatment. The results proved that in the plant studied 70-80% of the metal content was discharged. Only 5-20% was retained in the digested sludge. A small percentage of the metal content of the influent could only be measured in the primary and secondary sludges. Otherwise, there were very similar metal concentrations in these sludge streams. The reject water exhibited an inconsiderable level of metal recycling in the technology, no more than 2-3% of the influent load. Some 2-10% of the heavy metal content of the inlet was removed from the sand trap. We did not find the separate heavy metal removal from the sludge streams efficient as most of the heavy metal load finally was discharged from the treatment plant with the treated effluent into the recipient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document