Reply letter to: Do we really need more research in order to be convinced that advanced life support is superior to basic life support for the non traumatic cardiac arrest patients?

Resuscitation ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. e9-e10
Author(s):  
G. Bakalos ◽  
M. Mamali ◽  
C. Komninos ◽  
E. Koukou ◽  
A. Tsantilas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest

Resuscitation on the field: basic and advanced life support and automatic external defibrillators

2019 ◽  
pp. 403-410
Author(s):  
Mark S. Link ◽  
Mark Estes III
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽  
Screening Strategy ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Playing Field

Resuscitation on the playing field is at least as important as screening in the prevention of death. Even if a screening strategy is largely effective, individuals will suffer sudden cardiac arrests. Timely recognition of a cardiac arrest with rapid implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and deployment and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) will save lives. Basic life support, including CPR and AED use, should be a requirement for all those involved in sports, including athletes. An emergency action plan is important in order to render advanced cardiac life support and arrange for transport to medical centres.

Life-threatening emergencies

2012 ◽  
pp. 40-61
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Wyatt ◽  
Robin N. Illingworth ◽  
Colin A. Graham ◽  
Kerstin Hogg ◽  
Michael J. Clancy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Life Threatening

Anaphylaxis 42 Treatment algorithm for adults with anaphylaxis 44 Choking 45 Cardiac arrest 46 In-hospital resuscitation algorithm 47 Adult basic life support 48 Cardiac arrest management 50 Advanced life support algorithm 52 Notes on using the advanced life support algorithm 53 Post-resuscitation care 54 Central venous access ...

scholarly journals Factors affecting survival after prehospital asystolic cardiac arrest in a Basic Life Support-Defibrillation system

CJEM ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (03) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Petrie ◽  
Valerie De Maio ◽  
Ian G. Stiell ◽  
Jonathan Dreyer ◽  
Michael Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Ethical Decision Making ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Bystander Cpr

ABSTRACT Objectives: Previous studies have shown a low but meaningful survival rate in cases of prehospital cardiac arrest with an initial rhythm of asystole. There may be, however, an identifiable subgroup in which resuscitation efforts are futile. This study identified potential field criteria for predicting 100% nonsurvival when the presenting rhythm is asystole in a Basic Life Support-Defibrillation (BLS-D) system. Methods: This prospective cohort study, a component of Phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Study, was conducted in 21 Ontario communities with BLS-D level of care, and included all adult arrests of presumed cardiac etiology according to the Utstein Style Guidelines. Analyses included descriptive and appropriate univariate tests, as well as multivariate stepwise logistic regression to determine predictors of survival. Results: From 1991 to 1997, 9899 consecutive cardiac arrest cases with the following characteristics: male (67.2%), bystander-witnessed (44.7%), bystander CPR (14.2%), call–response interval (CRI) ≤ 8 minutes (82%) and overall survival (4.3%) were enrolled. Of 9529 cases with available rhythm strip recordings, initial arrest rhythms were asystole in 40.8%, pulseless electrical activity in 21.2% and ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia in 38%. Of 3888 asystolic patients, 9 (0.2%) survived to discharge; 3 of these cases were unwitnessed arrests with no bystander CPR. There were no survivors if the CRI exceeded 8 minutes. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that independent predictors of survival to admission were “CRI in minutes” (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.98) and “bystander-witnessed” (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5–4.4). Conclusions: In a BLS-D system, there is a very low but measurable survival rate for prehospital asystolic cardiac arrest. CRIs of over 8 minutes were associated with 100% nonsurvival, whereas unwitnessed arrests with no bystander CPR were not. These data add to the growing literature that will help guide ethical decision-making for protocol development in emergency medical services systems.

Meta-analysis of the accuracy of termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 479-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H Ebell ◽  
Akke Vellinga ◽  
Siobhan Masterson ◽  
Phillip Yun
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Study Quality ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Low Rate

BackgroundOur objective was to perform a systematic review of studies reporting the accuracy of termination of resuscitation rules (TORRs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).MethodsWe performed a comprehensive search of the literature for studies evaluating the accuracy of TORRs, with two investigators abstracting relevant data from each study regarding study design, study quality and the accuracy of the TORRs. Bivariate meta-analysis was performed using the mada procedure in R.ResultsWe identified 14 studies reporting the performance of 9 separate TORRs. The sensitivity (proportion of eventual survivors for whom the TORR recommends resuscitation and transport) was generally high: 95% for the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) TORR, 97% for the basic life support (BLS) TORR and 99% for the advanced life support (ALS) TORR. The BLS and ERC TORR were more specific, which would lead to fewer futile transports, and all three of these TORRs had a miss rate of ≤0.13% (defined as a case where a patient is recommended for termination but survives). The pooled proportion of patients for whom each rule recommends TOR was much higher for the ERC and BLS TORRs (93.5% and 74.8%, respectively) than for the ALS TORR (29.0%).ConclusionsThe BLS and ERC TORRs identify a large proportion of patients who are candidates for termination of resuscitation following OHCA while having a very low rate of misclassifying eventual survivors (<0.1%). Further prospective validation of the ERC TORR and direct comparison with BLS TORR are needed.

scholarly journals Сardiopulmonary and cerebral resuscitation: new European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for resuscitation 2021

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 6-19
Author(s):  
L.V. Usenko ◽  
А.V. Tsarev ◽  
Yu.Yu. Kobelatsky
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Extracorporeal Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
European Resuscitation Council ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Electrical Defibrillation

The article presents the current changes in the algorithm of cardiopulmonary and cerebral resuscitation (CPCR), adopted by the European Council for Resuscitation in 2021. The article presents the principles of basic life support and advanced life support, inclu-ding taking into account the European recommendations published in 2020, dedicated to the specifics of CPCR in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The main focus of CPCR in the COVID-19 pandemic is that the safety of healthcare workers should never be compromised, based on the premise that the time it takes to ensure that care is delivered safely to rescuers is acceptable part of the CPCR process. The principles of electrical defibrillation, including in patients with coronavirus disease who are in the prone position, pharmacological support of CPCR, modern monitoring capabilities for assessing the quality of resuscitation measures and identifying potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest, the use of extracorporeal life support techno-logies during CPR are highlighted. The modern principles of intensive care of the post-resuscitation syndrome are presented, which makes it possible to provide improved outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: determinant factors for immediate survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Aparecida Morais ◽  
Daclé Vilma Carvalho ◽  
Allana dos Reis Correa
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Emergency Medical Services ◽  
Basic Life Support ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Determinant Factors ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Advanced Support

OBJECTIVE: to analyze determinant factors for the immediate survival of persons who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the advanced support units of the Mobile Emergency Medical Services (SAMU) of Belo Horizonte.METHOD: this is a retrospective, epidemiological study which analyzed 1,165 assistance forms, from the period 2008 - 2010. The collected data followed the Utstein style, being submitted to descriptive and analytical statistics with tests with levels of significance of 5%.RESULTS: the majority were male, the median age was 64 years, and the ambulance response time, nine minutes. Immediate survival was observed in 239 persons. An association was ascertained of this outcome with "cardiac arrest witnessed by persons trained in basic life support" (OR=3.49; p<0.05; CI 95%), "cardiac arrest witnessed by Mobile Emergency Medical Services teams" (OR=2.99; p<0.05; CI95%), "only the carry out of basic life support" (OR=0.142; p<0.05; CI95%), and "initial cardiac rhythm of asystole" (OR=0.33; p<0.05; CI 95%).CONCLUSION: early access to cardiopulmonary resuscitation was related to a favorable outcome, and the non-undertaking of advanced support, and asystole, were associated with worse outcomes. Basic and advanced life support techniques can alter survival in the event of cardiac arrest.

scholarly journals Impact of specific emergency measures on survival of out of hospital traumatic cardiac arrest: data from the northern french alps cardiac arrest registry.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Savary ◽  
François Morin ◽  
Delphine Douillet ◽  
Thierry Roupioz ◽  
François Xavier Ageron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Tension Pneumothorax ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Good Neurologic Outcome ◽  
Pelvic Stabilization ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The management of Out of hospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest (TCA) for professional rescuers combines advanced life support with specifics actions to treat potential reversible causes of the arrest: hypovolemia, hypoxemia, Tension Pneumothorax (TPx) and tamponade. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of specific rescue gestures on short-term outcomes in the context of resuscitation of patients with a pre-hospital TCA.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all TCA treated in two emergency medical units (EM unit), which are part of the Northern Alps emergency network, from January 2004 to December 2017. Utstein variables and specific rescue actions in TCA were compiled: advanced airway management, fluid administration, pelvic stabilization or tourniquet application, bilateral thoracostomy, and thoracotomy procedures. The primary end point was the survival rate at day 30 with good neurologic outcome (cerebral performance category [CPC] score 1 & 2).Results: 287 resuscitations attempt in TCA were included and 279 specific interventions were Identified: 262 Fluid expansion, 41 External Pelvic stabilizations, 5 tourniquets, 175 bilateral thoracostomies, (including 44 with TPx).Conclusion: Among standard resuscitation measures to treat reversible causes of cardiac arrest, we were able to show that bilateral thoracostomy and tourniquet application on a limb hemorrhage improves survival of TCA. A larger sample for pelvic stabilization is necessary.

Impact of Specific Emergency Measures on Survival in Out-of-Hospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Dominique Savary ◽  
François Morin ◽  
Delphine Douillet ◽  
Adrien Drouet ◽  
François Xavier Ageron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Tension Pneumothorax ◽  
Advanced Life Support ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Performance Category ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Pelvic Stabilization ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: The management of out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) for professional rescuers entails Advanced Life Support (ALS) with specific actions to treat the potential reversible causes of the arrest: hypovolemia, hypoxemia, tension pneumothorax (TPx), and tamponade. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of specific rescue measures on short-term outcomes in the context of resuscitating patients with a TCA. Methods: This retrospective study concerns all TCA patients treated in two emergency medical units, which are part of the Northern French Alps Emergency Network (RENAU), from January 2004 through December 2017. Utstein variables and specific rescue measures in TCA were compiled: fluid expansion, pelvic stabilization, tourniquet application, bilateral thoracostomy, and thoracotomy procedures. The primary endpoint was survival rate at Day 30 with good neurological status (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] score CPC 1 and CPC 2). Results: In total, 287 resuscitation attempts in TCA were included and 279 specific interventions were identified: 262 fluid expansions, 41 pelvic stabilizations, five tourniquets, and 175 bilateral thoracostomies (including 44 with TPx). Conclusion: Among the standard resuscitation measures to treat the reversible causes of cardiac arrest, this study found that bilateral thoracostomy and tourniquet application on a limb hemorrhage improve survival in TCA. A larger sample for pelvic stabilization is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document