Chest compression rate feedback based on transthoracic impedance

Resuscitation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 82-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Digna M. González-Otero ◽  
Sofía Ruiz de Gauna ◽  
Jesus Ruiz ◽  
Mohamud R. Daya ◽  
Lars Wik ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Torney ◽  
Peter O'Hare ◽  
Laura Davis ◽  
Bruno Delafont ◽  
Ben McCartney ◽  
...  

Introduction: A number of public access defibrillators incorporate computerised audio-visual feedback mechanisms to help responders deliver cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to current guidelines. A 2013 American Heart Association statement suggested that chest compression fraction (CCF) and compression rate should be prioritised over compression depth, chest recoil and ventilations. This usability study assessed the effect of real-time rate-only feedback on chest compression depth. Methods: Randomly selected users were recruited in a shopping mall (n=141; 15-65+ years) to deliver CPR using a public access defibrillator in a simulated scenario. Participants were randomly assigned one of two devices - (1) with CPR rate feedback in the form of a machine-interface comprising of audio-voice prompts and light emitting diodes; (2) without CPR feedback. Participants were instructed to turn on the device and follow the prompts, with no information on how to perform CPR provided. CPR rate and depth were captured by measuring displacement of a potentiometer contained in a specially designed manikin. The device was connected to the manikin via the electrode leads. The effect of rate-only feedback on compression depth and CPR fraction were assessed. Results: ANCOVA analysis between the two devices provided a mean difference (Standard Error; SE) of 4.52mm (1.38mm) indicating a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.001) between measured CPR depth favouring the device with CPR rate feedback. There was no significant difference in CCF between the devices. ANCOVA analysis provided a mean difference (SE) of 2.9% (1.9%) for the device with CPR rate feedback compared to the device without CPR rate feedback. Conclusion: The incorporation of clear, intuitive, audio-visual machine-interface that delivers CPR feedback can assist trained and untrained users in the optimisation of chest compression rate and maintain a high CCF. In conclusion, CPR rate-only feedback was not detrimental to chest compression depth and suggests rate-only feedback may improve compression depth.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. e0239950
Author(s):  
Sofía Ruiz de Gauna ◽  
Jesus María Ruiz ◽  
Jose Julio Gutiérrez ◽  
Digna María González-Otero ◽  
Daniel Alonso ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dongjun Yang ◽  
Wongyu Lee ◽  
Jehyeok Oh

Although the use of audio feedback with devices such as metronomes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a simple method for improving CPR quality, its effect on the quality of pediatric CPR has not been adequately evaluated. In this study, 64 healthcare providers performed CPR (with one- and two-handed chest compression (OHCC and THCC, respectively)) on a pediatric resuscitation manikin (Resusci Junior QCPR), with and without audio feedback using a metronome (110 beats/min). CPR was performed on the floor, with a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2. For both OHCC and THCC, the rate of achievement of an adequate compression rate during CPR was significantly higher when performed with metronome feedback than that without metronome feedback (CPR with vs. without feedback: 100.0% (99.0, 100.0) vs. 94.0% (69.0, 99.0), p < 0.001, for OHCC, and 100.0% (98.5, 100.0) vs. 91.0% (34.5, 98.5), p < 0.001, for THCC). However, the rate of achievement of adequate compression depth during the CPR performed was significantly higher without metronome feedback than that with metronome feedback (CPR with vs. without feedback: 95.0% (23.5, 99.5) vs. 98.5% (77.5, 100.0), p = 0.004, for OHCC, and 99.0% (95.5, 100.0) vs. 100.0% (99.0, 100.0), p = 0.003, for THCC). Although metronome feedback during pediatric CPR could increase the rate of achievement of adequate compression rates, it could cause decreased compression depth.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Ott ◽  
Alexander Krohn ◽  
Laurence H. Bilfield ◽  
F. Dengler ◽  
C. Jaki ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate leg-heel chest compression without previous training as an alternative for medical professionals and its effects on distance to potential aerosol spread during chest compression.Methods20 medical professionals performed standard manual chest compression followed by leg-heel chest compression after a brief instruction on a manikin. We compared percentage of correct chest compression position, percentage of full chest recoil, percentage of correct compression depth, average compression depth, percentage of correct compression rate and average compression rate between both methods. In a second approach, potential aerosol spread during chest compression was visualized.ResultsThere was no significant difference between manual and leg-heel compression. The distance to potential aerosol spread could have been increased by leg-heel method.ConclusionUnder special circumstances like COVID-19-pandemic, leg-heel chest compression may be an effective alternative without previous training compared to manual chest compression while markedly increasing the distance to the patient.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob E Thomsen ◽  
Martin Harpsø ◽  
Graham W Petley ◽  
Svend Vittinghus ◽  
Charles D Deakin ◽  
...  

Introduction: We have recently shown that Class 1 electrical insulating gloves are safe for hands-on defibrillation. Continuous chest compressions during defibrillation reduce the peri-shock pauses and increase the subsequent chance of successful defibrillation. In this study we have investigated the effect of these electrical insulation gloves on the quality of chest compressions, compared with normal clinical examination gloves. Methods: Emergency medical technicians trained in 2010 resuscitation guidelines delivered uninterrupted chest compressions for 6 min on a manikin, whilst wearing Class 1 electrical insulating gloves or clinical examination gloves. The order of gloves was randomized and each session of chest compressions was separated by at least 30 min to avoid fatigue. Data were collected from the manikin. Compression depth and compression rate were compared. Results: Data from 35 participants are shown in Figure 1. There was no statistically significant difference between Class 1 electrical insulating gloves in chest compression depth (median±range: 45 (28-61) vs 43 (28-61) p=0.69) and chest compression rate (113 (67-150) vs 113(72-145), p=0.87) when compared to clinical examination cloves. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the use of Class 1 electrical insulation gloves does not reduce the quality of chest compressions during simulated CPR compared to clinical examination gloves.


Resuscitation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 1281-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hehua Zhang ◽  
Zhengfei Yang ◽  
Zitong Huang ◽  
Bihua Chen ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1319-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koenraad G. Monsieurs ◽  
Melissa De Regge ◽  
Kristof Vansteelandt ◽  
Jeroen De Smet ◽  
Emmanuel Annaert ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 1053-1054
Author(s):  
Natalia García-Sánchez ◽  
Silvia Rodríguez-Blanco ◽  
Ignacio Oulego-Erroz ◽  
María Mercedes Busto-Cuiñas ◽  
Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document