scholarly journals Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire in community-based children

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei-Hui Tseng ◽  
Chung-Pei Fu ◽  
Brenda N. Wilson ◽  
Fu-Chang Hu
2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Pannekoek ◽  
Daniela Rigoli ◽  
Jan P. Piek ◽  
Nicholas C. Barrett ◽  
Marina Schoemaker

The parent-rated Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) has been revised to incorporate a wider age range, including adolescence. In this exploratory study, internal consistency and validity of the DCDQ-2007 was assessed using a community-based sample of 87 adolescents. Psychometric properties of the DCDQ-2007 were investigated and concurrent validity, sensitivity, and specificity were assessed with the MABC-2 as a criterion standard. The results demonstrated high internal consistency for the DCDQ-2007 and a relationship with the MABC-2 was found. The DCDQ-2007 met the recommended standard for sensitivity, although the confidence interval was large; however, it failed to meet the recommended standard for specificity. This has important implications concerning the suitability of the DCDQ-2007. Although promising psychometric properties were found within the current study, the applicability of the DCDQ-2007 as a screening measure for motor difficulties requires careful consideration.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 543-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Caravale ◽  
Silvia Baldi ◽  
Luca Capone ◽  
Fabio Presaghi ◽  
Umberto Balottin ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda N. Wilson ◽  
Susan G. Crawford ◽  
Dido Green ◽  
Gwen Roberts ◽  
Alice Aylott ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda N. Wilson ◽  
Dianne Creighton ◽  
Susan G. Crawford ◽  
Jennifer A. Heath ◽  
Lisa Semple ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. 1825-1851
Author(s):  
Wendy Aertssen ◽  
Dorothee Jelsma ◽  
Bouwien Smits-Engelsman

Abstract Objective Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) are reported to have lower levels of strength and anaerobic capacity. The purpose of this study was to (1) identify field-based tests for strength and anaerobic capacity used in studies comparing children with DCD and children who were typically developing (TD), (2) examine the methodological quality of studies reporting psychometric properties and rate the psychometric properties of the examined test, and (3) summarize available evidence by combining the methodological quality of the studies and the quality of the psychometric properties of the test. Methods An electronic search was conducted in July 2019 in 4 electronic databases. For purpose 1, primary studies were included with no exclusion of study design in which children aged 4 to 18 years with DCD were compared with children who were TD on strength and/or anaerobic capacity measures. For purpose 2, primary studies were included with no exclusion of study design in which a psychometric property was investigated. The Consensus-Based Standards for Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the 34 studies and rate the psychometric properties of the tests used. Results Hand-held dynamometer, bent knee push-up, vertical jump, standing long-jump, functional strength measurement, fitness test, and test battery can be recommended for TD, and the shuttle run item of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition and 10 m × 5 m sprints (straight and slalom) can be recommended for DCD. Conclusion Information regarding psychometric properties of field-based tests for strength and anaerobic capacity in children with DCD is lacking. Impact Information about the psychometric properties of field-based tests for strength and anaerobic capacity in children with DCD is lacking. More information is available on TD children, but it is also not complete; information regarding validity and responsiveness, especially, is missing. When using measures in children with DCD, it is important to keep in mind this lack of evidence for the validity and reliability of the outcomes for this target group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document