Combining UAV and Sentinel-2 auxiliary data for forest growing stock volume estimation through hierarchical model-based inference

2018 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 485-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Puliti ◽  
Svetlana Saarela ◽  
Terje Gobakken ◽  
Göran Ståhl ◽  
Erik Næsset
2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1524-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana Saarela ◽  
Sebastian Schnell ◽  
Anton Grafström ◽  
Sakari Tuominen ◽  
Karin Nordkvist ◽  
...  

In this study, we investigate the use of model-based inference in forest surveys in which auxiliary data are available as a probability sample. We evaluate the effects of model form and sample size on estimators of growing stock volume, based on different types of remotely sensed auxiliary data. The study was performed through Monte Carlo sampling simulation using a two-phase sampling design within a simulated study area resembling the conditions in mid-western Finland. We show that the choice of model has a minor to moderate effect on the precision of model-based estimators. Similarly, the choice of estimator of the variance–covariance matrix of model parameter estimates, which is at the core of uncertainty assessment in model-based inference, was also found to have a minor to moderate effect on the precision of model-based estimators. Regarding sample sizes, the model error contribution to the total variance remains the same regardless of the sample size of the first phase (i.e., the size of the sample of auxiliary data); to reduce the model-error contribution, there is a need to increase the sample size of the second phase (i.e., the size of the sample of field plots for developing regression models). As a baseline for comparisons, model-assisted estimators were applied and found to be about equally precise as the model-based estimators, in accordance with the theory for the case when models are estimated from the sample data.


2020 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferhat Bolat ◽  
Sinan Bulut ◽  
Alkan Günlü ◽  
İlker Ercanlı ◽  
Muammer Şenyurt

Background: The use of satellite imagery to quantify forest metrics has become popular because of the high costs associated with the collection of data in the field.Methods: Multiple linear regression (MLR) and regression kriging (RK) techniques were used for the spatial interpolation of basal area (G) and growing stock volume (GSV) based on Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2. The performance of the models was tested using the repeated k-fold cross-validation method.Results: The prediction accuracy of G and GSV was strongly related to forest vegetation structure and spatial dependency. The nugget value of semivariograms suggested a moderately spatial dependence for both variables (nugget/sill ratio approx. 70%). Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 based RK explained approximately 52% of the total variance in G and GSV. Root-mean-square errors were 7.84 m2 ha-1 and 49.68 m3 ha-1 for G and GSV, respectively.Conclusions: The diversity of stand structure particularly at the poorer sites was considered the principal factor decreasing the prediction quality of G and GSV by RK.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 4483
Author(s):  
W. Gareth Rees ◽  
Jack Tomaney ◽  
Olga Tutubalina ◽  
Vasily Zharko ◽  
Sergey Bartalev

Growing stock volume (GSV) is a fundamental parameter of forests, closely related to the above-ground biomass and hence to carbon storage. Estimation of GSV at regional to global scales depends on the use of satellite remote sensing data, although accuracies are generally lower over the sparse boreal forest. This is especially true of boreal forest in Russia, for which knowledge of GSV is currently poor despite its global importance. Here we develop a new empirical method in which the primary remote sensing data source is a single summer Sentinel-2 MSI image, augmented by land-cover classification based on the same MSI image trained using MODIS-derived data. In our work the method is calibrated and validated using an extensive set of field measurements from two contrasting regions of the Russian arctic. Results show that GSV can be estimated with an RMS uncertainty of approximately 35–55%, comparable to other spaceborne estimates of low-GSV forest areas, with 70% spatial correspondence between our GSV maps and existing products derived from MODIS data. Our empirical approach requires somewhat laborious data collection when used for upscaling from field data, but could also be used to downscale global data.


Forests ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest William Mauya ◽  
Joni Koskinen ◽  
Katri Tegel ◽  
Jarno Hämäläinen ◽  
Tuomo Kauranne ◽  
...  

Remotely sensed assisted forest inventory has emerged in the past decade as a robust and cost efficient method for generating accurate information on forest biophysical parameters. The launching and public access of ALOS PALSAR-2, Sentinel-1 (SAR), and Sentinel-2 together with the associated open-source software, has further increased the opportunity for application of remotely sensed data in forest inventories. In this study, we evaluated the ability of ALOS PALSAR-2, Sentinel-1 (SAR) and Sentinel-2 and their combinations to predict growing stock volume in small-scale forest plantations of Tanzania. The effects of two variable extraction approaches (i.e., centroid and weighted mean), seasonality (i.e., rainy and dry), and tree species on the prediction accuracy of growing stock volume when using each of the three remotely sensed data were also investigated. Statistical models relating growing stock volume and remotely sensed predictor variables at the plot-level were fitted using multiple linear regression. The models were evaluated using the k-fold cross validation and judged based on the relative root mean square error values (RMSEr). The results showed that: Sentinel-2 (RMSEr = 42.03% and pseudo − R2 = 0.63) and the combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 (RMSEr = 46.98% and pseudo − R2 = 0.52), had better performance in predicting growing stock volume, as compared to Sentinel-1 (RMSEr = 59.48% and pseudo − R2 = 0.18) alone. Models fitted with variables extracted from the weighted mean approach, turned out to have relatively lower RMSEr % values, as compared to centroid approaches. Sentinel-2 rainy season based models had slightly smaller RMSEr values, as compared to dry season based models. Dense time series (i.e., annual) data resulted to the models with relatively lower RMSEr values, as compared to seasonal based models when using variables extracted from the weighted mean approach. For the centroid approach there was no notable difference between the models fitted using dense time series versus rain season based predictor variables. Stratifications based on tree species resulted into lower RMSEr values for Pinus patula tree species, as compared to other tree species. Finally, our study concluded that combination of Sentinel-1&2 as well as the use Sentinel-2 alone can be considered for remote-sensing assisted forest inventory in the small-scale plantation forests of Tanzania. Further studies on the effect of field plot size, stratification and statistical methods on the prediction accuracy are recommended.


2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1561-1570 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.E.B. Eriksson ◽  
M. Santoro ◽  
A. Wiesmann ◽  
C.C. Schmullius

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-8
Author(s):  
Ainārs Grīnvalds

Abstract Traditionally forest resources are estimated in each compartment or stand with ocular standwise forest inventory. However, this inventory technique has shortages with measurement accuracy. In the study the accuracy of the standwise forest inventory was estimated by comparing the growing stock volume of the standwise inventory with the accurate (instrumental) re-measurements. Comparison was done with 4515 mature stands of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), birch (Betula spp.), aspen (Populus tremula L.) and black alder (Alnus glutinosa L.). The stands’ measurements by callipers or by harvesters (recalculated to growing stock volume) were used for accurate re-measurements. The study results show that the volume of standwise forest inventory have relative bias of 17.6% (volume is underestimated by 17.6%) and relative root mean square error 27.5 % for the whole data. Spruce stands are more accurately measured and black alder stands - inaccurately. The accuracy of pine, birch and mixed stands was similar to overall trends. Stands with volume 200 - 300 m3 ha-1 are more accurately measured and stands with the volume less than 200 m3 ha-1 - most inaccurately. The accuracy of stands with the volume more than 300 m3 ha-1, decreases by increasing the volume of stands. The volume estimation of individual species has different trends in standwise forest inventory. The volume of pine and birch is overestimated and the volume of spruce, aspen and black alder is underestimated.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 5725-5756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanvir Chowdhury ◽  
Christian Thiel ◽  
Christiane Schmullius ◽  
Martyna Stelmaszczuk-Górska

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document