Corrigendum to “Overview of current compressed air energy storage projects and analysis of the potential underground storage capacity in India and the UK” [Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 139 (2021) 110705]

2021 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 110760
Author(s):  
Marcus King ◽  
Anjali Jain ◽  
Rohit Bhakar ◽  
Jyotirmay Mathur ◽  
Jihong Wang
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4728
Author(s):  
David Evans ◽  
Daniel Parkes ◽  
Mark Dooner ◽  
Paul Williamson ◽  
John Williams ◽  
...  

The increasing integration of large-scale electricity generation from renewable energy sources in the grid requires support through cheap, reliable, and accessible bulk energy storage technologies, delivering large amounts of electricity both quickly and over extended periods. Compressed air energy storage (CAES) represents such a storage option, with three commercial facilities using salt caverns for storage operational in Germany, the US, and Canada, with CAES now being actively considered in many countries. Massively bedded halite deposits exist in the UK and already host, or are considered for, solution-mined underground gas storage (UGS) caverns. We have assessed those with proven UGS potential for CAES purposes, using a tool developed during the EPSRC-funded IMAGES project, equations for which were validated using operational data from the Huntorf CAES plant. From a calculated total theoretical ‘static’ (one-fill) storage capacity exceeding that of UK electricity demand of ≈300 TWh in 2018, filtering of results suggests a minimum of several tens of TWh exergy storage in salt caverns, which when co-located with renewable energy sources, or connected to the grid for off-peak electricity, offers significant storage contributions to support the UK electricity grid and decarbonisation efforts.


Author(s):  
B. R. Clausen ◽  
M. Nakhamkin ◽  
E. C. Swensen

This paper presents preliminary engineering results for a 50 MW Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) plant for the Alabama Electric Cooperative, Inc. (AEC). The CAES plant would improve AEC’s power generation mix in two ways: (a) it would provide needed peaking/intermediate power (otherwise purchased) and (b) it would increase the load factor of economical baseload units. The paper presents the following: a. Comparative trade-off analysis of various conceptual arrangements with underground storage depths ranging between 1000 feet and 4000 feet. (The most economical concept is selected based on the consideration of economics of the overall plant including underground storage). b. Engineering and cost data, performance data, construction schedule and environmental data for the selected CAES plant concept. The results of this preliminary engineering effort prove that a CAES plant is a cost effective addition to AEC’s installed power generation plants.


Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Dooner ◽  
Jihong Wang

As the number of renewable energy sources connected to the grid has increased, the need to address the intermittency of these sources becomes essential. One solution to this problem is to install energy storage technologies on the grid to provide a buffer between supply and demand. One such energy storage technology is Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES), which is suited to large-scale, long-term energy storage. Large scale CAES requires underground storage caverns, such as the salt caverns situated in the Cheshire Basin, UK. This study uses cavern data from the Cheshire Basin as a basis for performing an energy and exergy analysis of 10 simulated CAES systems to determine the exergy storage potential of the caverns in the Cheshire Basin and the associated work and power input and output. The analysis revealed that a full charge of all 10 caverns could store 25.32 GWh of exergy, which can be converted to 23.19 GWh of work, which requires 43.27 GWh of work to produce, giving a round trip efficiency of around 54%. This corresponds to an input power of 670.07 GW and an output power of 402.74 GW. The Cheshire Basin could support around 100 such CAES plants, giving a potential total exergy storage capacity of 2.53 TWh and a power output of 40 TW. This is a significant amount of storage which could be used to support the UK grid. The total exergy destroyed during a full charge, store, and discharge cycle for each cavern ranged from 299.02 MWh to 1600.00 MWh.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document