scholarly journals Drought tolerance in cowpea species is driven by less sensitivity of leaf gas exchange to water deficit and rapid recovery of photosynthesis after rehydration

2016 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Rivas ◽  
H.M. Falcão ◽  
R.V. Ribeiro ◽  
E.C. Machado ◽  
C. Pimentel ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria D. Pissolato ◽  
Neidiquele M. Silveira ◽  
Paula J. Prataviera ◽  
Eduardo C. Machado ◽  
Amedea B. Seabra ◽  
...  

AbstractNitric oxide (NO) is an important signaling molecule associated with many biochemical and physiological processes in plants under stressful conditions. Nitrate reductase (NR) not only mediates the reduction of NO3− to NO2− but also reduces NO2− to NO, a relevant pathway for NO production in higher plants. Herein, we hypothesized that sugarcane plants supplied with more NO3− as a source of N would produce more NO under water deficit. Such NO would reduce oxidative damage and favor photosynthetic metabolism and growth under water limiting conditions. Sugarcane plants were grown in nutrient solution and received the same amount of nitrogen, with varying nitrate:ammonium ratios (100:0 and 70:30). Plants were then grown under well-watered or water deficit conditions, in which the osmotic potential of nutrient solution was −0.15 and −0.75 MPa, respectively. Under water deficit, plants exhibited higher root [NO3−] and [NO2−] when supplied with 100% NO3−. Accordingly, the same plants also showed higher root NR activity and root NO production. We also found higher photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance in plants supplied with more NO3−, which improved root growth. ROS accumulation was reduced due to increases in the activity of catalase in leaves and superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in roots of plants supplied with 100% NO3− and facing water deficit. Such positive responses to water deficit were offset when a NO scavenger was supplied to the plants, thus confirming that increases in leaf gas exchange and plant growth were induced by NO. Concluding, NO3− supply is an interesting strategy for alleviating the negative effects of water deficit on sugarcane plants, increasing drought tolerance through enhanced NO production. Our data also provide insights on how plant nutrition could improve crop tolerance against abiotic stresses, such as drought.HighlightsNitrate supply improves sugarcane growth under water deficit.Nitrate supply stimulated nitrate reductase activity and NO synthesis in sugarcane roots facing water deficit.Leaf gas exchange was increased by nitrate supply as well as root growth under water limiting conditions.Antioxidant responses were also improved in plants supplied exclusively with nitrate.Nitrogen management may be an interesting strategy for improving drought tolerance in sugarcane fields.


HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 540a-540
Author(s):  
K.J. Prevete ◽  
R.T. Fernandez

Three species of herbaceous perennials were tested on their ability to withstand and recover from drought stress periods of 2, 4, and 6 days. Eupatorium rugosum and Boltonia asteroides `Snowbank' were chosen because of their reported drought intolerance, while Rudbeckia triloba was chosen based on its reported drought tolerance. Drought stress began on 19 Sept. 1997. Plants were transplanted into the field the day following the end of each stress period. The effects of drought on transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and net photosynthetic rate were measured during the stress and throughout recovery using an infrared gas analysis system. Leaf gas exchange measurements were taken through recovery until there were no differences between the stressed plants and the control plants. Transpiration, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis of Rudbeckia and Boltonia were not affected until 4 days after the start of stress. Transpiration of Eupatorium decreased after 3 days of stress. After rewatering, leaf gas exchange of Boltonia and Rudbeckia returned to non-stressed levels quicker than Eupatorium. Growth measurements were taken every other day during stress, and then weekly following transplanting. Measurements were taken until a killing frost that occurred on 3 Nov. There were no differences in the growth between the stressed and non-stressed plants in any of the species. Plants will be monitored throughout the winter, spring, and summer to determine the effects of drought on overwintering capability and regrowth.


1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 861 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Schaper ◽  
EK Chacko ◽  
SJ Blaikie

Gas exchange, leaf water status, soil water use and nut yield of cashew trees were monitored during the reproductive phase in 2 consecutive years (1988 and 1989). Treatment 1 comprised continuous irrigation from the end of the wet season in April until harvest in October; T2, irrigation between flowering (mid June) and harvest; and T3, no irrigation. Irrigation was applied by under-tree sprinkler at 43 mm/week in 1988 and 64 mm/week in 1989. Measurement of leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll content and nut production showed that trees in T2 were as productive as those in T1 (>1.3 kg kernel/tree). In T3, water deficit caused a 4-fold reduction in leaf photosynthesis and reduced leaf chlorophyll content from about 600 to 400 mg/m2 during fruit development. There was no effect on the number of hermaphrodite flowers produced (both ranging from 0 to 15 hermaphrodite flowers/panicle) but the water deficit was associated with a lower kernel yield (1.16 kg kernel/tree). Commercial yields (kg kernel/tree) in irrigated treatments were 20% greater than in the non-irrigated treatment and the kernels from irrigated trees were of a higher grade (kernel recovery >32% in T1 and T2 compared with 27.4% in T3). These results suggest that irrigation of established cashew plantations in the tropical regions of northern Australia can be restricted to the period between flowering and harvest without reducing yield.


Author(s):  
Neidiquele M. Silveira ◽  
Rafael V. Ribeiro ◽  
Sabrina F.N. de Morais ◽  
Sarah C.R. de Souza ◽  
Simone F. da Silva ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Rosas-Anderson ◽  
Thomas R. Sinclair ◽  
Anna Locke ◽  
Thomas E. Carter ◽  
Thomas W. Rufty

Trees ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla A. Silva ◽  
Igor V. Oliveira ◽  
Kátia C. B. Rodrigues ◽  
Vanessa S. Cosme ◽  
Abel J. R. Bastos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document