Nanostructured anion exchange membranes based on poly(arylene piperidinium) with bis-cation strings for diffusion dialysis in acid recovery

Author(s):  
Binghui Liu ◽  
Yuting Duan ◽  
Tingting Li ◽  
Jialin Li ◽  
Haiqiu Zhang ◽  
...  
Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Majeda Khraisheh ◽  
Fares AlMomani

Recycling of acid from aqueous waste streams is crucial not only from the environmental point of view but also for maturing the feasible method (diffusion dialysis). Anion exchange membrane (AEM)–based diffusion dialysis process is one of the beneficial ways to recover acid from aqueous waste streams. In this article, the synthesis of a series of brominated poly (2, 6–dimethyl-1, 4–phenylene oxide) (BPPO)-based anion exchange membranes (AEMs) through quaternization with triphenylphosphine (TPP) were reported for acid recovery via diffusion dialysis process. The successful synthesis of the prepared membranes was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The as-synthesized anion exchange membranes represented water uptake (WR) of 44 to 66%, ion exchange capacity of (IEC) of 1.22 to 1.86 mmol/g, and linear swelling ratio (LSR) of 8 to 20%. They exhibited excellent thermal, mechanical, and acid stability. They showed homogeneous morphology. The acid recovery performance of the synthesized AEMs was investigated in a two compartment stack using simulated mixture of HCl and FeCl2 as feed solution at room temperature. For the synthesized anion exchange membranes TPP–43 to TPP–100, the diffusion dialysis coefficient of acid (UH+) was in the range of 6.7 to 26.3 (10−3 m/h) whereas separation factor (S) was in the range of 27 to 49 at 25 °C. Obtained results revealed that diffusion dialysis performance of the synthesized AEMs was higher than the commercial membrane DF–120B (UH+ = 0.004 m/h, S = 24.3) at room temperature. It showed that the prepared AEMs here could be excellent candidates for the diffusion dialysis process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 624 ◽  
pp. 119116
Author(s):  
Jiuyang Lin ◽  
Junming Huang ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Junwei Yu ◽  
Xinqiang You ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (47) ◽  
pp. 24000-24007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaocheng Lin ◽  
Ezzatollah Shamsaei ◽  
Biao Kong ◽  
Jefferson Zhe Liu ◽  
Tongwen Xu ◽  
...  

Anion exchange membranes with fast acid permeation and high retention of salts have been fabricated to increase the process efficiency of acid recovery from various industrial processes via diffusion dialysis, thereby greatly reducing their energy consumption and environmental impact.


2020 ◽  
Vol 175 ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
Wenya Liu ◽  
Meng Li ◽  
Mengjie Sun ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Cuiming Wu ◽  
...  

Membranes ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Abdallah Shanableh ◽  
Majeda Khraisheh ◽  
Fares AlMomani

Diffusion dialysis (DD) is an anion exchange membrane-based functional separation process used for acid recovery. TMA (trimethylamine) and BPPO (brominated poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) were utilized in this manuscript to formulate AEMs (anion exchange membranes) for DD (diffusion dialysis) using the phase-inversion technique. FTIR (Fourier transfer infrared) analysis, proton NMR spectroscopy, morphology, IEC (ion exchange capacity), LER (linear expansion ratio), CR (fixed group concentration), WR (water uptake/adsorption), water contact angle, chemical, and thermal stability, were all used to evaluate the prepared membranes. The effect of TMA content within the membrane matrix on acid recovery was also briefly discussed. It was reported that porous AEMs have a WR of 149.6% to 233.8%, IEC (ion exchange capacity) of 0.71 to 1.43 mmol/g, CR (fixed group concentration) that ranged from 0.0046 mol/L to 0.0056 mol/L, LER of 3.88% to 9.23%, and a water contact angle of 33.10° to 78.58°. The UH (acid dialysis coefficients) for designed porous membranes were found to be 0.0043 to 0.012 m/h, with separation factors (S) ranging from 13.14 to 32.87 at the temperature of 25 °C. These observations are comparable to those found in the DF-120B commercial membrane with UH of 0.004 m/h and S of 24.3 m/h at the same temperature (25 °C). This porous membranes proposed in this paper are excellent choices for acid recovery through the diffusion dialysis process.


Materials ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khan ◽  
Rafael Luque ◽  
Pepijn Prinsen ◽  
Aziz Ur Rehman ◽  
Saima Anjum ◽  
...  

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran Khan ◽  
Abdallah Shanableh ◽  
Noureddine Elboughdiri ◽  
Karim Kriaa ◽  
Djamel Ghernaout ◽  
...  

In this work, the synthesis of a series of the functionalized inorganic/organic composite anion exchange membranes (AEMs) was carried out by employing the varying amount of inorganic filler consist of N-(trimethoxysilylpropyl)-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (TMSP-TMA+Cl−) into the quaternized poly (2, 6-dimethyl-1, 4-phenylene oxide) (QPPO) matrix for acid recovery via diffusion dialysis (DD) process. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy clearly demonstrated the fabrication of the functionalized inorganic/organic composite AEMs and the subsequent membrane characteristic measurements such as ion exchange capacity (IEC), linear swelling ratio (LSR), and water uptake (WR) gave us the optimum loading condition of the filler without undesirable filler particle aggregation. These composite AEMs exhibited IEC of 2.18 to 2.29 meq/g, LSR of 13.33 to 18.52%, and WR of 46.11 to 81.66% with sufficient thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability. The diffusion dialysis (DD) test for acid recovery from artificial acid wastewater of HCl/FeCl2 showed high acid DD coefficient (UH+) (0.022 to 0.025 m/h) and high separation factor (S) (139-260) compared with the commercial membrane. Furthermore, the developed AEMs was acceptably stable (weight loss < 20%) in the acid wastewater at 60 °C as an accelerated severe condition for 2 weeks. These results clearly indicated that the developed AEMs have sufficient potential for acid recovery application by DD process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 139-147
Author(s):  
Congliang Cheng ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Bing Tong ◽  
Xianhai Hu ◽  
Ping Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document