scholarly journals Supporting family carers of people with dementia: A discrete choice experiment of public preferences

2021 ◽  
Vol 287 ◽  
pp. 114359
Author(s):  
Áine Teahan ◽  
Sharon Walsh ◽  
Edel Doherty ◽  
Eamon O'Shea
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Public Preferences ◽  
People With Dementia

scholarly journals Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim-Sarah Krinke ◽  
Ulla Tangermann ◽  
Volker Eric Amelung ◽  
Christian Krauth
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Public Preferences

scholarly journals A Discrete-Choice Experiment to capture public preferences on the benefits of home-visiting programme for teenage mothers

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 677
Author(s):  
Eugena Stamuli ◽  
Gerry Richardson ◽  
Michael Robling ◽  
Michelle Edwards ◽  
David Torgerson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Child Development ◽  
Life Course ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
General Public ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Building Blocks ◽  
Public Preferences ◽  
Health And Social Care

Background: Complex health and social care interventions impact on a multitude of outcomes. One such intervention is the Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme, which was introduced to support young, first-time mothers. Our study quantified the relative values that the general public place on the outcomes of FNP, as they were identified and measured in the relevant randomized trial, Building Blocks trial (BBs). Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was employed. Respondents chose between two scenarios describing hypothetical sets of trial outcomes. BBs compared FNP care for teenagers expecting their first child with standard NHS care. 14 attributes covered three areas: pregnancy and birth, child development and maternal life course. Due to large number of attributes, a “blocked attributes” approach was adopted: the attributes were split across four designs which contained two common attributes. Data were analysed separately for each design as well as pooled across four designs. Random effects probit model was employed for the analysis. Results: Over 1000 participants completed four designs. The analyses on the separate designs and those on pooled data yielded broadly similar results. Respondents valued higher the outcomes related to child development and their needs, followed by the outcomes related to maternal life course. Preferences varied by the age of the respondents but not by their guardianship/parentship status.  Conclusions: Individual preferences were consistent with a priori expectations and were intuitive.  The DCE results can be used to incorporate the general public preferences into the decision making process for which public health and social care policies should be adopted.

Donor motives, public preferences and the allocation of UK foreign aid: a discrete choice experiment approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Feeny ◽  
Paul Hansen ◽  
Stephen Knowles ◽  
Mark McGillivray ◽  
Franz Ombler
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Aid ◽  
Discrete Choice Experiment ◽  
Discrete Choice ◽  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Public Preferences
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document