Frequent-wildfires with shortened time-since-fire affect soil microbial functional stability to drying and rewetting events

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 663-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Guénon ◽  
Raphaël Gros
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainara Leizeaga ◽  
Lettice Hicks ◽  
Albert Brangarí ◽  
Carla Cruz-Paredes ◽  
Menale Wondie ◽  
...  

<p>Climate change predicts an increase in temperature and an intensification of the hydrological cycles resulting in more extreme drought and rainfall events. When dry soils experience a rainfall event, there is a big CO<sub>2</sub> release from soil to the atmosphere which is regulated by soil microorganisms. In the present study, we set out to investigate how drought and warming affects the soil microbial responses to drying and rewetting (DRW); and how those responses are affected by differences in land use. Previous work has shown that exposure DRW cycles in the laboratory and in the field can induce faster recovery (more ‘resilient’) of the microbial responses after a DRW cycle. In addition, a history of drought has been suggested to result in microbial communities with higher carbon use efficiency (CUE) during DRW in a wet heathland in Northern Europe and in semi-arid grasslands in Texas. We wanted to extend these observations to subtropical environments.</p><p> </p><p>With the aim of simulating drought and warming, rain shelters and open top chambers (OTC) were installed in Northern Ethiopia in 2 contrasting land-uses (a degraded cropland and a pristine forest) for 1.5 years. Soils were then sampled and exposed to a DRW cycle in the laboratory. Microbial growth and respiration responses were followed with high temporal resolution over 3 weeks, as well as, changes in microbial community structure.  </p><p> </p><p>Microbial functions universally showed a resilient response after a DRW cycle, with bacterial growth and fungal growth increasing immediately upon rewetting linked with the expected respiration response. The field treatments and land-use differences, therefore, did not have an effect on the resilience of soil microbial communities to DRW cycles. There were differences between the two main decomposer groups: fungi were more resilient than bacteria, as they showed a faster recovery rate. Microbial CUE upon rewetting responded differently in the different field treatments and land-uses. CUE was generally higher in croplands than in forests. Besides, while simulated drought reduced CUE, simulated drought increased CUE. These differences might be explained by either (i) the selection or more efficient microbial communities due to a higher exposure to DRW events or (ii) differences in resource availability (i.e. plant input).  </p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blandine Lyonnard ◽  
Albert Brangarí ◽  
Johannes Rousk

<p>The alternation of drought periods and rainfall events, intensified by climate change, has huge impacts on carbon cycle dynamics. Changes in soil moisture induce significant releases of CO<sub>2</sub> from soils to the atmosphere. This phenomenon, known as the Birch effect, is accompanied by drastic changes in the microbiology as well. Based on the response patterns of microbial growth and respiration to the rewetting of dry soil, two different types have been identified. Microbial communities either respond immediately after rewetting and start increasing growth in a linear way (so-called “type 1” response), or they recover growth after a lag phase preceding an exponential increase (“type 2” response). The reasons behind the different responses, including how harsh the drought is perceived by the communities and what history of moisture conditions they were subjected to, are not yet fully resolved. Moreover, most studies focus on the top few centimeters of soil and the effect of depth and the contribution of deeper soils to the overall dynamics have been largely overlooked.</p><p>In order to investigate the influence of depth on microbial dynamics during drought and rainfall events, taking into account land-use, we performed a set of laboratory experiments that were also used to parameterize and validate numerical modelling-based analysis of the ecology driving soil biogeochemistry. We collected soil samples from permanent pasture and tilled and cropped arable fields at two different depths (0-5 cm and 20-30 cm). We then subjected them to a week of air drying followed by rewetting to optimal moisture, and measured respiration, bacterial growth and fungal growth at high temporal resolution.</p><p>The patterns were significantly different between soil types, showing type 1 responses in arable soils and type 2 responses in pasture soils. The type 1 responses in arable soils were also characterized by a higher carbon use efficiency after the rewetting perturbation. Moreover, the deeper microbial communities were relatively more affected by the drying and rewetting experiment than the respective shallow ones. Taken together, these results suggested that the drying and rewetting event was perceived by soil microbial communities as a stronger disturbance in the pasture soils, and at deeper depths, as illustrated by more sensitive microbial responses.</p><p>We then incorporated these laboratory data into a soil microbial model (EcoSMMARTS) and identified the depth- and community-specific differences in osmolyte regulation, necromass turnover, and cell residue activity as the microbial mechanisms potentially explaining the observed patterns. These findings provide insights into soil-climate feedback from different ecosystems, where intensively used arable soils were more resilient than permanent pasture soils and stored larger amounts of carbon due to a higher fraction of microbial growth to respiration under climate change scenarios. The capacity of microbial communities to adapt and regulate soil carbon dynamics is not uniform through the soil profile nor across management practices, therefore indicating a need for future studies incorporating depth and especially land-use which has the strongest effect on microbial activity during soil drying and rewetting.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainara Leizeaga ◽  
Lettice C. Hicks ◽  
Albert C. Brangarí ◽  
Menale Wondie ◽  
Hans Sandén ◽  
...  

<p>Climate change will increase temperatures and the frequency and intensity of extreme drought and rainfall events. When a drought period is followed by a rainfall event, there is a big CO<sub>2</sub> pulse from soil to the atmosphere which is regulated by soil microorganisms. In the present study, we set out to investigate how simulated drought and warming affects the soil microbial responses to drying and rewetting (DRW), and how those responses will interact with the level of land degradation. Previous work has shown that exposure DRW cycles in the laboratory and in the field can induce changes in the microbial community such that it resumes growth rates faster after a DRW cycle. In addition, it has been observed that a history of drought in both a humid heathland ecosystem in Northern Europe and in semi-arid grasslands in Texas can select for microorganisms with a higher carbon use efficiency (CUE) during DRW. In this study we tested if these observations could be extended to subtropical environments.</p><p>Rain shelters and open top chambers (OTC) were installed in Northwestern Ethiopia in two contrasting land-uses; a degraded cropland and a pristine forest. Soils were sampled (>1-year field treatments) and exposed to a DRW cycle in the laboratory. Microbial growth and respiration responses were followed with high temporal resolution over 3 weeks. We hypothesized that (i) simulated drought would result in more resilient and efficient microbial communities to DRW, while (ii) simulated warming should leave microbial community traits linked to moisture unchanged. In addition, (iii) we hypothesized that microbial communities would recover growth rates faster in the cropland since that ecosystem is more prone to DRW events.</p><p>Microbial responses in both land-uses and treatments universally showed a highly resilient type of community response with both bacterial growth and fungal growth increasing immediately upon rewetting, linked with the expected respiration pulse. The field treatments simulating drought and warming did not affect the already high resilience of soil microbial communities to DRW cycles. However, differences between the rates of recovery between fungi and bacteria were observed. Fungal growth recovered faster than bacterial growth, peaking c. 15 h in comparison to bacteria that peaked at c.20h after rewetting. Simulated drought reduced the microbial CUE during rewetting in croplands without affecting the forest soils. The CUE was also elevated in the warming treatments in both land-uses, and generally higher in croplands than in forest soils. Taken together, the responses in microbial CUE during the rewetting of dry soils were likely linked to either (i) differences in resource availability which were higher in warming treatments and in croplands compared to forests, or (ii) selection of  more efficient microbial communities due to a higher exposure to DRW events driven by the higher temperatures in the cropland, and increased evapotranspiration in the warming treatments.</p><div> <div> <div> </div> </div> </div>


2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 107844
Author(s):  
E. Picariello ◽  
D. Baldantoni ◽  
S. Muniategui-Lorenzo ◽  
E. Concha-Graña ◽  
F. De Nicola

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Liu ◽  
Katharina M. Keiblinger ◽  
Sonja Leitner ◽  
Uwe Wegner ◽  
Michael Zimmermann ◽  
...  

Global climate change is predicted to alter drought–precipitation patterns, which will likely affect soil microbial communities and their functions, ultimately shifting microbially-mediated biogeochemical cycles. The present study aims to investigate the simultaneous variation of microbial community compositions and functions in response to drought and following rewetting events, using a soil metaproteomics approach. For this, an established field experiment located in an Austrian forest with two levels (moderate and severe stress) of precipitation manipulation was evaluated. The results showed that fungi were more strongly influenced by drying and rewetting (DRW) than bacteria, and that there was a drastic shift in the fungal community towards a more Ascomycota-dominated community. In terms of functional responses, a larger number of proteins and a higher functional diversity were observed in both moderate and severe DRW treatments compared to the control. Furthermore, in both DRW treatments a rise in proteins assigned to “translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis” and “protein synthesis” suggests a boost in microbial cell growth after rewetting. We also found that the changes within intracellular functions were associated to specific phyla, indicating that responses of microbial communities to DRW primarily shifted microbial functions. Microbial communities seem to respond to different levels of DRW stress by changing their functional potential, which may feed back to biogeochemical cycles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document