Influence of stress history on the cyclic behavior of compacted soils in the frozen state: Deviator stress history

Author(s):  
Qionglin Li ◽  
Kai Cui ◽  
Xiang Jing ◽  
Pangju Li ◽  
Heng Dong
1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Ishihara ◽  
Shigeru Okada

10.2514/3.875 ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 165-172
Author(s):  
S. Rao ◽  
E. L. Mulkay ◽  
J. M. Ochterbeck

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-475
Author(s):  
Yukihiro HARADA ◽  
Kazumasa EBATO ◽  
Junpei YAGI
Keyword(s):  

HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 479d-479
Author(s):  
Michael Knee ◽  
Ruth Brake

In urban situations, particularly after construction, herbaceous ornamentals may be planted into soils that are compacted or have poor structure so that plant roots may encounter poor aeration or physical resistance. Low oxygen concentrations may be the most important aspect of poor aeration and are readily reproduced in the laboratory. High atmospheric pressure might be used to screen for the ability to grow against physical resistance. We tested the suggestion that “native” plants would grow better in compacted soils than typical bedding plants and for differences in tolerance to low oxygen or high pressure. Plants were grown from seed in the greenhouse at four levels of compaction in peat-based medium and in field soil. Shoot dry weights of the native plants Asclepias tuberosa, Echinacea purpurea, and Schizachyrium scoparius, were less affected by growth in compacted soil or peat medium than those of the bedding plants, Antirrhinum majus, Gypsophila elegans, Impatiens balsamina, Tagetes patula and Zinnia elegans. The oxygen content of media declined with compaction to a minimum of 10 kPa. Half maximal root elongation was observed at 1 to 3 kPa oxygen for most species without any separation between the groups. A presure of 1100 kPa reduced root elongation of the bedding plants by 50 to 70% but only 5 to 20% for the native plants.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabahattin Aykaç ◽  
Eray Özbek ◽  
Ali Tugrul Tankut

Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Azadi Kakavand ◽  
Ertugrul Taciroglu

AbstractSome of the current concrete damage plasticity models in the literature employ a single damage variable for both the tension and compression regimes, while a few more advanced models employ two damage variables. Models with a single variable have an inherent difficulty in accounting for the damage accrued due to tensile and compressive actions in appropriately different manners, and their mutual dependencies. In the current models that adopt two damage variables, the independence of these damage variables during cyclic loading results in the failure to capture the effects of tensile damage on the compressive behavior of concrete and vice-versa. This study presents a cyclic model established by extending an existing monotonic constitutive model. The model describes the cyclic behavior of concrete under multiaxial loading conditions and considers the influence of tensile/compressive damage on the compressive/tensile response. The proposed model, dubbed the enhanced concrete damage plasticity model (ECDPM), is an extension of an existing model that combines the theories of classical plasticity and continuum damage mechanics. Unlike most prior studies on models in the same category, the performance of the proposed ECDPM is evaluated using experimental data on concrete specimens at the material level obtained under cyclic multiaxial loading conditions including uniaxial tension and confined compression. The performance of the model is observed to be satisfactory. Furthermore, the superiority of ECDPM over three previously proposed constitutive models is demonstrated through comparisons with the results of a uniaxial tension-compression test and a virtual test.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document