P139. Effects of Bryan's Cervical Disc Prosthesis on Maintaining Sagittal Alignment of the Functional Spinal Unit and Overall Sagittal Balance of the Cervical Spine

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 146S-147S
Author(s):  
Seok Woo Kim ◽  
Jae Hyuk Shin ◽  
Moon Soo Park ◽  
Soon Eok Kwon ◽  
Paul C. McAfee
2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwynedd E. Pickett ◽  
Demytra K. Mitsis ◽  
Lali H. Sekhon ◽  
William R. Sears ◽  
Neil Duggal

Object Cervical arthroplasty offers the promise of maintaining motion of the functional spinal unit (FSU) after anterior cervical discectomy. The impact of cervical arthroplasty on sagittal alignment of the FSU needs to be addressed, together with its effect on overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Methods The authors prospectively reviewed radiographic and clinical outcomes in 14 patients who received the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN), for whom early (< 6 months) and late (6–24 months) follow-up data were available. Static and dynamic radiographs were measured by hand and computer to determine the angles formed by the endplates of the natural disc preoperatively, those formed by the shells of the implanted prosthesis, the angle of the FSU, and the C2–7 Cobb angle. The range of motion (ROM) was also determined radiographically, whereas clinical outcomes were assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short Form–36 (SF-36) questionnaires. The ROM was preserved following surgery, with a mean preoperative sagittal rotation angle of 8.96°, which was not significantly different from the late postoperative value of 8.25°. When compared with the preoperative disc space angle, the shell endplate angle in the neutral position became kyphotic in the early and late postoperative periods (mean change −3.8° in the late follow-up period; p = 0.0035). The FSU angles also became significantly more kyphotic post-operatively, with a mean change of −6° (p = 0.0006). The Cobb angles varied widely preoperatively and did not change significantly after surgery. There was no statistical correlation between the NDI and SF-36 outcomes and cervical kyphosis. Conclusions Cervical arthroplasty preserves motion of the FSU. Both the endplate angle of the treated disc space and the angle of the FSU became kyphotic after insertion of the Bryan prosthesis. The overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine, however, was preserved.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 538-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Barrey ◽  
Thomas Mosnier ◽  
Jérôme Jund ◽  
Gilles Perrin ◽  
Wafa Skalli

Object Few biomechanical in vitro studies have reported the effects of disc replacement on motion and kinematics of the cervical spine. The purpose of this study was to analyze motion through 3D load-displacement curves before and after implantation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center; special focus was placed on coupled motion, which is a well-known aspect of normal cervical spine kinematics. Methods Six human cervical spines were studied. There were 3 male and 3 female cadaveric specimens (mean age at death 68.5 ± 5 years [range 54–74 years]). The specimens were evaluated sequentially in 2 different conditions: first they were tested intact; then the spinal specimens were tested after implantation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis, the Discocerv, at the C5–6 level. Pure moment loading was applied in flexion/extension, left and right axial rotation, and left and right lateral bending. All tests were performed under load control with a 3D measurement system. Results No differences were found to be statistically significant after comparison of range of motion between intact and instrumented spines for all loading conditions. The mean range of motion for intact spines was 10.3° in flexion/extension, 5.6° in lateral bending, and 5.4° in axial rotation; that for instrumented spines was 10.4, 5.2, and 4.8°, respectively. No statistical difference was observed for the neutral zone nor stiffness between intact and instrumented spines. Finally, the coupled motions were also preserved during axial rotation and lateral bending, with no significant difference before and after implantation. Conclusions This study demonstrated that, under specific testing conditions, a ball-and-socket joint with cranial geometrical center can restore motion in the 3 planes after discectomy in the cervical spine while maintaining physiological coupled motions during axial rotation and lateral bending.


Spine ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S186-S194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Anderson ◽  
Jeffrey P. Rouleau ◽  
Vincent E. Bryan ◽  
Cathy S. Carlson

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jigang Lou ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
Tingkui Wu ◽  
Wenjie Wu ◽  
Huibo Li ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 885-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt Lind ◽  
Björn Zoëga ◽  
Paul A. Anderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document