Analysis on occupational-related safety fatal accident reports of China, 2001–2008

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 640-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhangtao
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Dennis B. Brickman ◽  
Ralph L. Barnett

Abstract A fatal accident occurred when a right angle gear box on an auger elevator disintegrated freeing the outboard end of a rotating PTO shaft. The tractor, acting as a stationary power source, flailed the PTO shaft which then struck and killed a farmer. No similar occurrences have been reported for the nearly 2000 similar units which have been used for over a decade. This paper studies a number of fundamental failure modes in order to determine which failure modes created the accident. Systematic analysis showed that the accident was caused by unusual misuse of the product. Known safety control concepts do not preclude this unforeseeable event.


2018 ◽  
Vol 301 ◽  
pp. 44-52
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kowalski ◽  

The aim of the article to present the role of analysing the manner of generating fingermarks in the investigative proceedings. These examinations are based on the analysis of the location of the marks on a given background and aim at providing the requesting party additional information about the circumstances of the investigated incident. The Author refers to two unusual cases, in which Voivodeship Police Command Forensic Laboratory issued expert opinions in the area of fingerprint identification. In the first case, at the initial stage of the proceedings the circumstances and recovered evidential fingermarks indicated a fatal accident or manslaughter by means of a firearm. In the other case at the preliminary stage recovered evidence did not allow identification of the perpetrator due to incorrectly selected exhibits. These cases would not be off special interest to us without the significant role of proper recovering of fingermarks and their analysis in a broader context than just identification.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 556-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Alaziz ◽  
Adrienne Stolfi ◽  
Dean M. Olson

2002 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 357-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pavlic ◽  
A. Haidekker ◽  
P. Grubwieser ◽  
W. Rabl
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan M. McManus ◽  
Abraham M. Rutchick

With the imminent advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs) comes a moral dilemma: How do people assign responsibility in the event of a fatal accident? AVs necessarily create conditions in which “drivers” yield agency to a machine. The current study examines how people make attributions of blame and praise in this context. Varying the features of AV technology affected how responsible a “driver” (who purchased the vehicle) is perceived to be following a deadly crash. The findings provide support for agency and commission as crucial bases of moral judgment. They also raise questions about how morally contradictory actions are perceived and underscore the need for research examining how moral responsibility is distributed among multiple potentially culpable agents. Pragmatically, these findings suggest that regulating (or declining to regulate) how AVs are programmed may strongly influence perceptions of moral and legal culpability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document