Reliability and validity of a perinatal depression screening instrument in rural Mali

2022 ◽  
pp. 100059
Author(s):  
Molly E. Lasater ◽  
Madeleine Beebe ◽  
Nicole E. Warren ◽  
Peter J. Winch ◽  
Fatoumata Soucko ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly M. Long ◽  
Robert J. Cramer ◽  
Linda Bennington ◽  
Frank G. Morgan ◽  
Charles A. Wilkes ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (2, Part 1) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trent E. J. Gordon ◽  
Ida A. Cardone ◽  
Jennifer J. Kim ◽  
Scott M. Gordon ◽  
Richard K. Silver

Author(s):  
WQ Xue ◽  
KK Cheng ◽  
D Xu ◽  
X Jin ◽  
WJ Gong

Abstract Aims Perinatal depression threatens the health of maternal women and their offspring. Although screening programs for perinatal depression exist, non-uptake of referral to further mental health care after screening reduces the utility of these programs. Uptake rates among women with positive screening varied widely across studies and little is known about how to improve the uptake rate. This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence on uptake rates, estimate the pooled rate, identify interventions to improve uptake of referral and explore the effectiveness of those interventions. Methods This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42019138095). We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Database and VIP Databases from database inception to January 13, 2019 and scanned reference lists of relevant researches for studies published in English or Chinese. Studies providing information on uptake rate and/or effectiveness of interventions on uptake of referral were eligible for inclusion. Studies were excluded if they did not report the details of the referral process or did not provide exact uptake rate. Data provided by observational studies and quasi-experimental studies were used to estimate the pooled uptake rate through meta-analysis. We also performed meta-regression and subgroup analyses to explore the potential source of heterogeneity. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, we conducted descriptive analyses instead of meta-analyses since there was only one randomised controlled trial (RCT). Results Of 2302 records identified, 41 studies were eligible for inclusion, including 39 observational studies (n = 9337), one quasi-experimental study (n = 43) and one RCT (n = 555). All but two studies were conducted in high-income countries. The uptake rates reported by included studies varied widely and the pooled uptake rate of referral was 43% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 35–50%) by a random-effect model. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses both showed that referral to on-site assessment or treatment (60%, 95% CI 51–69%) had a significantly higher uptake rate than referral to mental health service (32%, 95% CI 23–41%) (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.13–1.52). The included RCT showed that the referral intervention significantly improved the uptake rate (p < 0.01). Conclusions Almost three-fifths of women with positive screening results do not take up the referral offers after perinatal depression screening. Referral to on-site assessment and treatment may improve uptake of referral, but the quality of evidence on interventions to increase uptake was weak. More robust studies are needed, especially in low-and middle-income countries.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Tabb ◽  
Shinwoo Choi ◽  
Maria Pineros-Leano ◽  
Brandon Meline ◽  
Hellen G. McDonald ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 60S ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jo Kim ◽  
Richard K. Silver ◽  
Laura M. La Porte ◽  
Ying Zhou ◽  
Samantha B. Allweiss ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Reilly ◽  
Dawn Kingston ◽  
Deborah Loxton ◽  
Kristina Talcevska ◽  
Marie-Paule Austin

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 78E-87E
Author(s):  
N. Jennifer Klinedinst ◽  
Barbara Resnick

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study is to test the reliability and validity of the 3-item Useful Depression Screening Tool (UDST) for use with older adults in congregate living settings. Methods: There were 176 residents of senior housing or assisted living who completed the UDST. Rasch analysis and test criterion relationships with pain, physical activity, and depression diagnosis were used to determine validity. Test–retest reliability was conducted with 29 senior housing residents. Results: Rasch analysis demonstrated good fit of all items to the concept of depression. Criterion validity was supported, F(5) = 14.17, p < .001. Test–retest showed no significant differences in UDST scores over time (p = .29). Conclusions: The findings provide support for the validity and reliability of the UDST for use with older adults in congregate living settings.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Segre ◽  
Rebecca L. Brock ◽  
Michael W. O’Hara ◽  
Laura L. Gorman ◽  
Jane Engeldinger

Author(s):  
Ana Telma Pereira ◽  
Mariana Marques ◽  
Cristiana Marques ◽  
Elisabete Bento ◽  
Julieta Azevedo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document