New pedotransfer functions for soil water retention curves that better account for bulk density effects

2021 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 104812
Author(s):  
Zhengchao Tian ◽  
Jiazhou Chen ◽  
Chongfa Cai ◽  
Weida Gao ◽  
Tusheng Ren ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Štekauerová ◽  
J. Šútor ◽  
C. Farkas

In this study pedotransfer functions (PTFs) were developed to estimate the soil water retention curves (SWRCs) for Rye Island (Csallóköz, S. W. Slovakia). A representative set of soil water retention curves was measured using a laboratory method on samples taken from soils the study area. Particle size distribution and bulk density were determined as well. Multiple regression analysis was used for estimating nine statistical relationships in order to predict the drying part of the SWRCs. Texture and bulk density were used as predictors. Pedotransfer functions were verified on another set of measured water retention curves from the same territory as well as on SWRCs determined for soils of the Szigetköz region in Hungary. A good agreement was found between the calculated and measured SWRCs for the Slovakian soils, while somewhat poorer estimates could be given for Hungarian soils.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 730-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Carlos Medeiros ◽  
Miguel Cooper ◽  
Jaqueline Dalla Rosa ◽  
Michel Grimaldi ◽  
Yves Coquet

Knowledge of the soil water retention curve (SWRC) is essential for understanding and modeling hydraulic processes in the soil. However, direct determination of the SWRC is time consuming and costly. In addition, it requires a large number of samples, due to the high spatial and temporal variability of soil hydraulic properties. An alternative is the use of models, called pedotransfer functions (PTFs), which estimate the SWRC from easy-to-measure properties. The aim of this paper was to test the accuracy of 16 point or parametric PTFs reported in the literature on different soils from the south and southeast of the State of Pará, Brazil. The PTFs tested were proposed by Pidgeon (1972), Lal (1979), Aina & Periaswamy (1985), Arruda et al. (1987), Dijkerman (1988), Vereecken et al. (1989), Batjes (1996), van den Berg et al. (1997), Tomasella et al. (2000), Hodnett & Tomasella (2002), Oliveira et al. (2002), and Barros (2010). We used a database that includes soil texture (sand, silt, and clay), bulk density, soil organic carbon, soil pH, cation exchange capacity, and the SWRC. Most of the PTFs tested did not show good performance in estimating the SWRC. The parametric PTFs, however, performed better than the point PTFs in assessing the SWRC in the tested region. Among the parametric PTFs, those proposed by Tomasella et al. (2000) achieved the best accuracy in estimating the empirical parameters of the van Genuchten (1980) model, especially when tested in the top soil layer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 868-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raghavendra B. Jana ◽  
Binayak P. Mohanty ◽  
Everett P. Springer

Author(s):  
João H. Caviglione

ABSTRACT One big challenge for soil science is to translate existing data into data that is needed. Pedotransfer functions have been proposed for this purpose and they can be point or parametric when estimating the water retention characteristics. Many indicators of soil physical quality have been proposed, including the S-Index proposed by Dexter. The objective of this study was to assess the use of pedotransfer functions for soil water retention to estimate the S-index under field conditions in the diversity of soils of the Paraná state. Soil samples were collected from 36 sites with textures ranging from sandy to heavy clay in the layers of 0-0.10 and 0.10-0.20 m and under two conditions (native forest and cultivated soil). Water content at six matric potentials, bulk density and contents of clay, sand and silt were determined. Soil-water retention curve was fitted by the van Genuchten-Mualem model and the S-index was calculated. S-index was estimated from water retention curves obtained by the pedotransfer function of Tomasella (point and parametric). Although the coefficient of determination varied from 0.759 to 0.895, modeling efficiency was negative and the regression coefficient between observed and predicted data was different from 1 in all comparisons. Under field conditions in the soil diversity of the Paraná state, restrictions were found in S-index estimation using the evaluated pedotransfer functions.


Author(s):  
Francesca Ventura ◽  
Fiorenzo Salvatorelli ◽  
Stefano Piana ◽  
Linda Pieri ◽  
Paola Rossi Pisa

ABSTRACTThe pyrolysis conversion of vegetable residues into energy and biochar, and its incorporation in agricultural soil, reduces CO2emission and provides a longterm soil carbon sequestration. Moreover, biochar application in soil seems to increase nutrient stocks in the rooting layer, improving crop yield. Compared with the numerous studies assessing the positive effect of biochar on yield, however, little research has been published elucidating the mechanisms responsible for the reported benefits. Few studies cited soil moisture as the key factor, attributing the increased yield to the higher soil water availability.The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of biochar on the physical and hydraulic properties of a bare Padana Plain (Cadriano, Bologna) agricultural soil. A preliminary plot experiment in 2009 explored the influence of 10 and 30 kg ha–1of biochar on soil moisture, without effects from plants. Results of the first experiment suggested using higher biochar rates in a similar experimental scheme. During the second experiment, 30 and 60 t ha–1doses were investigated. Soil water content, bulk density, electrical conductivity and soil water retention were measured. The comparison between treated soils and the control indicates that the biochar rate is directly correlated to electrical conductibility and inversely correlated with bulk density. The effect on the density of soil can be very positive in case of heavy soils. The dark colour of the char increased the surface temperature with respect to the control, while no differences were detected at 7·5 cm depth. No influences were found on other soil characteristics, including soil pH, moisture and water retention.


Soil Research ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 431 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Liao ◽  
S. Xu ◽  
J. Wu ◽  
Q. Zhu

Hydrological, environmental and ecological modellers require van Genuchten soil-water retention parameters that are difficult to measure. Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are thus routinely applied to predict hydraulic parameters (θs, ln(α) and n) from basic soil properties (e.g. bulk density, soil texture and organic matter content). This study investigated the spatial variations of van Genuchten parameters via geostatistical methods (e.g. kriging and co-kriging with remote-sensing data) and multiple-stepwise-regression-based PTFs with a limited number of samples (58) collected in Pingdu City, Shandong Province, China. The uncertainties in the spatial estimation of van Genuchten parameters were evaluated using bootstrap and Latin hypercube sampling methods. Results show that PTF-estimated parameters are less varied than observed parameters. The uncertainty in the parameter estimation is mainly due to the limited number of samples used for deriving PTFs (intrinsic uncertainty) and spatial interpolations of basic soil properties by (co)kriging (input uncertainty). When considering the intrinsic uncertainty, 36%, 29% and 47% of measurements are within the corresponding error bars (95% confidence intervals of the predictions) for the θs, ln(α) and n, respectively. When considering both intrinsic and input uncertainties, 86%, 66% and 88% of observations are within the corresponding error bars for the θs, ln(α) and n, respectively. Therefore, the input uncertainty is more important in the spatial estimation of van Genuchten parameters than the intrinsic uncertainty. Measurement of basic soil properties at high resolution and properly use of powerful spatial interpolation approach are both critical in the accurate spatial estimation of van Genuchten parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document