Long-term outcomes after prophylactic bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: Final analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Surgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 157 (6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Hirao ◽  
Yukinori Kurokawa ◽  
Junya Fujita ◽  
Hiroshi Imamura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Fujiwara ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kurokawa ◽  
Y. Fujiwara ◽  
S. Takiguchi ◽  
J. Fujita ◽  
H. Imamura ◽  
...  

72 Background: Omental bursectomy, a traditional surgical procedure to dissect the peritoneal lining covering the pancreas and the anterior plane of the transverse mesocolon, has often been performed against resectable gastric cancer. We have conducted a multi- institutional randomized controlled trial to elucidate the safety and usefulness of this procedure. Methods: Patients with cT2 or cT3 gastric adenocarcinoma were intraoperatively randomized to radical gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy either with or without bursectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The planned sample size was 464, with an alpha error of 0.05 and statistical power of 80% to detect a 10% margin of non-inferiority for the non-bursectomy group. The first interim analysis was conducted on Sep 2008, and we decided the preliminary data release according to Korn's proposal (J Clin Oncol. 2005). Results: Between Jul 2002 and Jan 2007, a total of 210 patients were randomized to either the bursectomy group or the non-bursectomy group. Background characteristics were well balanced. Intraoperative blood loss was greater in the bursectomy group than in the non-bursectomy group (median, 475 mL vs. 350 mL, p=0.047), while other surgical factors did not vary significantly. The overall morbidity rate was 14%, the same between two groups. The hospital mortality rate was 0.95%; one patient per group. In the first interim analysis, the 3-year OS were 86% in bursectomy group and 79% in non-bursectomy group, and the hazard ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 0.84-2.84). The non-bursectomy group had more patients with peritoneal recurrences than the bursectomy group (14% vs. 8%). Conclusions: Experienced surgeons could safely perform a D2 gastrectomy with an additional bursectomy. First interim analysis suggested the survival advantage of omental bursectomy for cT2-3 gastric cancer patients. Final analysis will be conducted in 2012. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document