Loss of Bcl-2 expression in colon cancer: A prognostic factor for recurrence in stage II colon cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Poincloux ◽  
Xavier Durando ◽  
Jean François Seitz ◽  
Emilie Thivat ◽  
Valérie-Jeanne Bardou ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 852-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Inafuku ◽  
Tomohisa Furuhata ◽  
Makoto Tayama ◽  
Kenji Okita ◽  
Toshihiko Nishidate ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyuan Ma ◽  
Chaowen Wu ◽  
Lu Ding ◽  
Dong Yu ◽  
Xinrong Shi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: 5-Fluoruracil based adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection is recommended for stage II colon cancer patients with high risk of recurrence. Up to now, novel biomarkers still needed for better stratification for improving prognosis. Methods: Here we report that UCHL1 is an independent prognostic factor for stage II colon cancer patients and promotes chemoresistance both in vitro and in vivo. Results: Our study indicated that UCHL1 is significant up regulated in 96 pairs of stage II colon cancer patients who received postoperative 5-FU based chemotherapy. Stage II colon cancer patients with high UCHL1 expression showed high recurrence rate after chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that UCHL1 is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P=0.008) and disease-free survival (P=0.001). 5-FU based chemoresistance is examined in colon cancer cell lines (RKO and LoVo) with down regulation of UCHL1 by cytotoxicity test. Down regulation of UCHL1 exhibited decreased cell viability, elevated cell apoptosis rate, increased G2/M-phase and elevated level of cleaved caspase 3 and PARP when treated with 5-FU. Furthermore, the results in xenograft model are consistent with results in vitro.Conclusions: UCHL1 potentially contributing to identify recurrence risk and predict the benefit for postoperative 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3609-3609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Megumi Ishiguro ◽  
Eiji Nakatani ◽  
Toshiaki Ishikawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Uetake ◽  
...  

3609 Background: Growing number of studies indicate tumor budding is a significant prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (van Wyk, et al. Cancer Treat Rev 2015), but this has been shown only in retrospective studies. We prospectively evaluated prognostic factors in stage II colon cancer to determine their prognostic value in a multi-institutional phase III study (SACURA trial, ASCO2016 abst#3617). Methods: A total of 991 patients with curatively resected stage II colon cancer (2006–2010; 136 institutions) were included in the study. Tumor budding was defined as an isolated cancer cell or a cluster composed of fewer than five cells in the invasive frontal region, and was graded based on its number within a microscopic field of a 20x objective lens (0.785 mm2) in the hotspot. Tumors with < 5, 5–9, and ≥10 budding foci were classified as grades G1, G2, and G3, respectively. All clinical and pathological data including the grade of budding were prospectively recorded and prognostic analyses were performed at 5 years after the completion of registration. Results: According to budding grading, 376, 331 and 284 tumors were classified as G1, G2, and G3, and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 90.9%, 85.1%, and 74.4%, respectively ( P < 0.0001). Budding grade was significantly associated with the incidence of recurrence in the liver, lung, lymph node, and peritoneum ( P < 0.0001–0.01). Among conventional factors, T stage and the serum CEA levels were associated with RFS, however, tumor grade, lymphatic and venous invasions, and the number of lymph node examined were not significant factors. Multivariate analysis for RFS showed budding, along with T stage, exerted an independent influence on prognostic outcome. Budding grade surpassed T stage and tumor grade in the ability to stratify patients by RFS (Harrell’s c-index, 0.63, 0.59, and 0.54, respectively). Conclusions: Our prospective study indicates that the grade of tumor budding is more informative for prognostic prediction than conventional prognostic factors in stage II colon cancer. The role of this prognostic factor should be highlighted in the adjuvant treatment setting, and conversely, some of prognostic factors adopted in clinical guidelines may need to be reconsidered. Clinical trial information: NCT00392899.


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 70-79
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Cecchini ◽  
Joanna C. Walsh ◽  
Jeremy Parfitt ◽  
Subrata Chakrabarti ◽  
Rohann J. Correa ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Lv ◽  
Yuqi Liang ◽  
Huaxi Liu ◽  
Delong Mo

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document