The atomic surface structure of SrTiO3(001) in air studied with synchrotron X-rays

2005 ◽  
Vol 595 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 183-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Vonk ◽  
S. Konings ◽  
G.J. van Hummel ◽  
S. Harkema ◽  
H. Graafsma
ACS Catalysis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 4006-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra L. Clark ◽  
Stefan Ringe ◽  
Michael Tang ◽  
Amber Walton ◽  
Christopher Hahn ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. R5117-R5120 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Vogt ◽  
Th. Hannappel ◽  
S. Visbeck ◽  
K. Knorr ◽  
N. Esser ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 243 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 49-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
E van de Riet ◽  
S Deckers ◽  
F.H.P.M Habraken ◽  
A Niehaus

MRS Bulletin ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Brian Stephenson ◽  
Jeffrey A. Eastman ◽  
Orlando Auciello ◽  
Anneli Munkholm ◽  
Carol Thompson ◽  
...  

Vapor-phase processes such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and reactive ion etching are the primary methods for the production-scale synthesis and processing of many high-quality thin-film materials. For example, these processes are widely used in the microelectronics industry for synthesis and lithography of the various semiconducting, insulating, and conducting layers in devices. Understanding the means of controlling the microstructure and composition of these materials is of great technological interest. However a difficulty often encountered in developing vapor-phase processes is an undesirable dependence on trial-and-error methods for optimizing the many process parameters. These parameters include gas composition, flow rate, pressure, and substrate temperature, all of which are typically changing with time. This reliance on empirical methods can be attributed to the tremendous chemical and physical complexity of vapor-phase processes and the lack of appropriate in situ measurement techniques for the vapor-phase environment.We have initiated a program to apply synchrotron x-ray analysis techniques as real-time probes of film and surface structure during vapor-phase processing. X-rays have a combination of properties which makes them particularly well-suited for these studies. Unlike electrons, x-rays have a sufficiently low absorption to penetrate vapor-phase processing environments and chamber walls. Unlike visible light, x-rays have wavelengths and energies suitable for study of atomic-scale structure and chemistry. A growing number of in situ synchrotron x-ray investigations of film growth and processing demonstrate the power of these techniques.


1997 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 567-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. COWLEY

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) instruments have some particular advantages as compared with the more common transmission electron microscopes for some applications to surface research. Imaging of surfaces and mapping of the elemental distributions on surfaces with spatial resolutions approaching 1 nm are possible in an ultrahigh-vacuum STEM instrument when the low-energy secondary electrons or the Auger-emitted electrons are collected with high efficiency. In the imaging of surface layers on thin-film substrates, viewed in transmission, the use of a thin annular detector in STEM may greatly enhance the contrast, as illustrated by the case of the imaging of very thin nanocrystalline carbon layers on much thicker amorphous SiO2 films. The scanning reflection mode in a STEM instrument can provide some useful forms of contrast in images of surface structure. Standing wave fields can be formed on the surfaces of crystals with electrons, as with X-rays, one advantage of the electron case being that the standing wave fields may be imaged. Two new forms of electron holography, involving a STEM instrument and suitable for the study of surface structure, are proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document