scholarly journals Automatic determination of chlorine without standard solutions using a biamperometric flow-batch analysis system

Talanta ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 609-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valberes B. Nascimento ◽  
Thiago M.G. Selva ◽  
Elaine C.S. Coelho ◽  
Francyana P. Santos ◽  
Jadielson L.S. Antônio ◽  
...  
Talanta ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina C. Acebal ◽  
Marcos Grünhut ◽  
Ivana Šrámková ◽  
Petr Chocholouš ◽  
Adriana G. Lista ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 237-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser Hosseini ◽  
Blanka Hejdukova ◽  
Pall E. Ingvarsson ◽  
Bo Johnels ◽  
Torsten Olsson

Author(s):  
Romain Desplats ◽  
Timothee Dargnies ◽  
Jean-Christophe Courrege ◽  
Philippe Perdu ◽  
Jean-Louis Noullet

Abstract Focused Ion Beam (FIB) tools are widely used for Integrated Circuit (IC) debug and repair. With the increasing density of recent semiconductor devices, FIB operations are increasingly challenged, requiring access through 4 or more metal layers to reach a metal line of interest. In some cases, accessibility from the front side, through these metal layers, is so limited that backside FIB operations appear to be the most appropriate approach. The questions to be resolved before starting frontside or backside FIB operations on a device are: 1. Is it do-able, are the metal lines accessible? 2. What is the optimal positioning (e.g. accessing a metal 2 line is much faster and easier than digging down to a metal 6 line)? (for the backside) 3. What risk, time and cost are involved in FIB operations? In this paper, we will present a new approach, which allows the FIB user or designer to calculate the optimal FIB operation for debug and IC repair. It automatically selects the fastest and easiest milling and deposition FIB operations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (16-18) ◽  
pp. 932-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Nepstad ◽  
Emlyn Davies ◽  
Dag Altin ◽  
Trond Nordtug ◽  
Bjørn Henrik Hansen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document