Using scaffolding to support CLM students’ critical multiple perspective-taking on history

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 103396
Author(s):  
Vonna L. Hemmler ◽  
Amanda K. Kibler ◽  
Stephanie van Hover ◽  
Russell H. Carlock ◽  
Colleen Fitzpatrick
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolph J. Sanchez ◽  
Julie B. Olson-Buchanan ◽  
James M. Schmidtke ◽  
Paula L. Rechner

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-78
Author(s):  
Tone Pernille Østern ◽  
Camilla Reppen ◽  
Katarina Lion ◽  
Katarina Lundmark ◽  
Elisabet Sjöstedt Edelholm

This performative hybrid research and development project contributes knowledge about the decolonizing potentials and challenges that are articulated through an initial scanning of the dance pedagogical field as part of a large change project in tertiary dance education at the Department for Dance Pedagogy at Stockholm University of the Arts in Sweden. To do this scanning in a way that would promote collective learning, multiple perspective taking and creativity, we utilised design thinking. In total, 140 scan cards collected through the project were analysed. Both students and staff and other people in different parts of the world within the dance educational field created the scan cards. As a result, we suggest that the scanning of the field has pushed ourselves, the rest of the staff, students, and others into a process of collective learning, multiple perspective taking, and creativity, in which clear decolonizing potentials, as well as challenges to change are expressed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel G. B. Johnson

AbstractZero-sum thinking and aversion to trade pervade our society, yet fly in the face of everyday experience and the consensus of economists. Boyer & Petersen's (B&P's) evolutionary model invokes coalitional psychology to explain these puzzling intuitions. I raise several empirical challenges to this explanation, proposing two alternative mechanisms – intuitive mercantilism (assigning value to money rather than goods) and errors in perspective-taking.


2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan S. Chiaburu ◽  
Ann Chunyan Peng ◽  
Linn Van Dyne

We conducted an experiment to examine the effect of how subordinates present ideas (constructive vs. complaining form) on supervisor (receiver) responses (perceptions of subordinate intrusiveness and of overall performance). We demonstrated a joint effect of subordinate idea presentation (manipulated) and supervisor dogmatism (measured) such that supervisors with high levels of dogmatism rated subordinates who presented voice constructively as more intrusive and lower in performance than those with low dogmatism. Supervisor perspective taking mediated these relationships. Our findings highlight the importance of presenting ideas in a constructive form to receivers with low levels of dogmatism.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacquie D. Vorauer ◽  
Matthew Quesnel
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal T. Tse ◽  
Christine Logel ◽  
Steven J. Spencer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document