The growing importance of research methods in innovation management research: A note from the 2018 ISPIM Innovation Conference

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to survey existing information security policy (ISP) management research to scrutinise the extent to which manual and computerised support has been suggested, and the way in which the suggested support has been brought about. Design/methodology/approach The results are based on a literature review of ISP management research published between 1990 and 2017. Findings Existing research has focused mostly on manual support for managing ISPs. Very few papers have considered computerised support. The entire complexity of the ISP management process has received little attention. Existing research has not focused much on the interaction between the different ISP management phases. Few research methods have been used extensively and intervention-oriented research is rare. Research limitations/implications Future research should to a larger extent address the interaction between the ISP management phases, apply more intervention research to develop computerised support for ISP management, investigate to what extent computerised support can enhance integration of ISP management phases and reduce the complexity of such a management process. Practical implications The limited focus on computerised support for ISP management affects the kind of advice and artefacts the research community can offer to practitioners. Originality/value Today, there are no literature reviews on to what extent computerised support the ISP management process. Findings on how the complexity of ISP management has been addressed and the research methods used extend beyond the existing knowledge base, allowing for a critical discussion of existing research and future research needs.

Download Full-text

IS RADICAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT MISUNDERSTOOD? PROBLEMATISING THE RADICAL INNOVATION DISCIPLINE

International Journal of Innovation Management ◽

10.1142/s1363919615400101 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 19 (06) ◽

pp. 1540010 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

JIMMI NORMANN KRISTIANSEN ◽

FRANK GERTSEN

Keyword(s):

Innovation Management ◽

Radical Innovation ◽

Management Research ◽

Performance Expectations ◽

Research And Practice ◽

Critical View ◽

International Firms ◽

Market Shares ◽

Capability Building ◽

Program Failure

This paper poses a critical view on radical innovation (RI) management research and practice. The study investigates how expected RI performance influences firms’ understanding of their RI capability. RI performance is often based on output measures such as market shares or fiscal return. On the contrary, RI capability building advocates for exploration, learning, and accepting uncertainty. Hence, RI capability building often focuses on the processes of the firms, and not the outcome. Thus, it is argued that the RI capability-building and RI performance expectations are based on different managerial orientations. Coupling a discussion of the literature with case findings from four large international firms, this paper identifies a discrepancy between RI capability-building and RI performance within literature and practice. This is regarded to be a major contributing factor to RI program failure. This study presents three misunderstandings related to RI research and practice and discusses implications of these findings.

Download Full-text