Novel assay based on diluted prothrombin time reflects anticoagulant effects of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors: Results of multicenter study in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 158-164
Author(s):  
Masahiro Ieko ◽  
Kazumasa Ohmura ◽  
Sumiyoshi Naito ◽  
Mika Yoshida ◽  
Ichiro Sakuma ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
pp. 967-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt Olah ◽  
Mariann Szarvas ◽  
Zsuzsanna Bereczky ◽  
Adrienne Kerenyi ◽  
Janos Kappelmayer ◽  
...  

Context.—Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a heterogeneous group of antiphospholipid antibodies. Among others, diluted prothrombin time (dPT) is a sensitive screening test for LA; however, the interpretation of LA tests is difficult in patients treated with anticoagulants. The effect of different types of anticoagulants on the result of LA tests, particularly on dPT, has not been studied extensively. Objective.—To determine whether the direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and argatroban and the predominantly factor Xa inhibitors enoxaparin, danaparoid, and fondaparinux could interfere with LA screening based on dPT. Design.—Each drug was added to normal and LA-positive plasmas in clinically relevant concentrations. Each sample was tested for dPT. Samples with factor Xa inhibitors were investigated before and after addition of heparinase. Mixing and confirmatory tests for LA were not performed. Results.—In the presence of lepirudin or argatroban, dPT increased notably and the dPT ratio exceeded the cutoff value even at subtherapeutic concentrations resulting in false positivity. With increasing factor Xa inhibitor concentrations, a linear increase of dPT ratios and false-positive results were also demonstrated. Although heparinase could almost completely neutralize the anti-Xa effect of all investigated factor Xa inhibitors, dPT ratio returned to the basal level only in case of enoxaparin. Conclusions.—Here we provide evidence that both the direct thrombin and indirect factor Xa inhibitors influence dPT assay for LA, causing false positivity. This should be considered when interpreting LA results during anticoagulant therapy. However, dPT seems to be a reliable test for LA screening under enoxaparin therapy after neutralization by heparinase.


1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (02) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Hauptmann ◽  
B Kaiser ◽  
G Nowak ◽  
J Stürzebecher ◽  
F Markwardt

SummaryThe anticoagulant effect of selected synthetic inhibitors of thrombin and factor Xa was studied in vitro in commonly used clotting assays. The concentrations of the compounds doubling the clotting time in the various assays were mainly dependent on their thrombin inhibitory activity. Factor Xa inhibitors were somewhat more effective in prolonging the prothrombin time compared to the activated partial thromboplastin time, whereas the opposite was true of thrombin inhibitors.In vivo, in a venous stasis thrombosis model and a thromboplastin-induced microthrombosis model in rats the thrombin inhibitors were effective antithrombotically whereas factor Xa inhibitors of numerically similar IQ value for the respective enzyme were not effective at equimolar dosageThe results are discussed in the light of the different prelequisiles and conditions for inhibition of thrombin and factor Xa in the course of blood clotting.


1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 1296-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
R M Bertina ◽  
W van der Marel-van Nieuwkoop ◽  
E A Loeliger

SummaryTwo spectrophotometric assays for prothrombin have been developed and compared with a one stage coagulant and an immunological assay. One of these assays (called the XAPC assay) uses a combination of factor Xa, phospholipid, Ca2+ and factor V as activator of prothrombin, and measures only normal prothrombin. The second (the ECAR assay) uses Echis carinatus venom as activator. This assay measures both normal prothrombin and PIVKA II (protein induced by vitamin K antagonists/absence). Combination of the results obtained by the XAPC and ECAR assays provides rapid and reliable information on the degree of “subcarboxylation” of prothrombin (oral anticoagulation, vitamin K deficiency).For patients on long term anticoagulant treatment the prothrombin time (Thrombotest) shows better correlation with the ratio prothrombin/prothrombin plus PIVKA II (XAPC/ ECAR) than with the factor II concentration. For patients starting the anticoagulant treatment there is no correlation between the Thrombotest time and the XAPC/ECAR ratio.It seems doubtful that (a) spectrophotometric factor II assay(s) will be as useful as the prothrombin time in the control of oral anticoagulation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 46 (26) ◽  
pp. 5691-5699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Ostrovsky ◽  
Marina Udier-Blagović ◽  
William L. Jorgensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document